Comments by "" (@efghggdxlmfn33) on "Harvest Time🔥Another Massive Attack With Kinzhals💥Toretsk Is Collapsing⚔️Military Summary 2024.09.27" video.

@Thetequilashooter1 US achieved its primary goal in Afghanistan? Change Taliban to Taliban for 2 trillion $ and 20 years? Russia did not fight in Afghanistan, USSR - 40 years ago including Baltic and Ukraine by the way
2
@Thetequilashooter1 Russia did not invade Ukraine, Ukraine stopped existing as a sovereign state after 2014 American backed and sponsored coup d'état. Russia invaded American proxy on its border, the US would do much worse to Mexico or Canada in a similar situation.
2
@Thetequilashooter1 Same logic here - Russia attacked Ukro nato proxy because it was committing atrocities against the Donbass
2
@Thetequilashooter1 Why US can not give 200 Abrams and 100 Patriot and billion artillery shells? They empty
2
@Thetequilashooter1 Even delusional CNN has published an article which finally admits that the Russians currently are producing at least three times more shells than the entire Collective West is doing
2
@Thetequilashooter1 The US illegally invaded Syria.
2
@Thetequilashooter1 "Russian soldiers were also told" :face-purple-crying: Are you sure that Russia bombed the government quarter in Kyiv or the bridges across the Dnieper or all the dry cargo ships in the Black Sea? As would have happened in the case of a full-fledged war? Or declared a general mobilization and called up 20 million people? Or used tactical nuclear weapons that would have ended the war in 1 day?
2
@Thetequilashooter1 it accomplished its primary goal. WHAT Primary goal? Change Taliban to Taliban for 2 trillion and 20 years??
2
@chickenlover657 real dictator - cancels elections, closes borders and hunts for fresh meat in every town and city
1
@chickenlover657 one does not exclude the other
1
@Thetequilashooter1 A memorandum is not a treaty, it is something to be remembered, especially since this memorandum has not been ratified by any of the parties, so it has no legal force, that's first of all, secondly, Ukraine has violated its own declaration of independence, the 9th paragraph of which states that it has no right to join Nato, thirdly, Russia has the right to deploy troops where Nazism originates, This is stipulated in the UN charter, and it does not require anyone's permission, I would even say that this is not a right but an obligation, and fourthly, many international documents stipulate that countries cannot strengthen their security at the expense of the security of others, study the documents and not propaganda,
1
@Thetequilashooter1 Over 300 billion in frozen Western assets frozen in Russia. So?
1
@Thetequilashooter1 how in 10 years in "Holy Democratic" Ukraine has NO ONE been sent to prison for burning more than 40 people alive in the center of Odessa 2 of May 2014???
1
@Thetequilashooter1 better print your delusional rules based order and go lecture to Donetsk, on tank
1
@Thetequilashooter1 " to help Afghanistan become a democratic country" AHAHA show me 1 happy country after democratization by US??
1
@Thetequilashooter1 So much happy democratic countries now: The total death toll of people killed by American troops in all major wars and conflicts since World War II is estimated to be over 12 million. This includes direct war violence in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and Pakistan, as well as casualties and fatalities in other conflicts.
1
@Thetequilashooter1 LIE - it was not about " join the EU "
1
@Thetequilashooter1 it was about an economic agreement with the EU that contradicted economic agreements with Russia. Purely bureaucratic contradictions and Yanukovych postponed the signing for 6 months. Your primitive lie has been refuted many times over 10 years - including by the participants of the "Maidan" themselves
1
@Thetequilashooter1 Well, what if Russia financed Mexican cartels, pumped them with weapons and planned to deploy weapons capable of being equipped with nuclear warheads - NATO wanted the same thing in Ukraine. To change the balance of nuclear deterrence. Well, as for the oppression of the Russian-speaking population, I can write you volumes of books - I've been to Donetsk many times. Do you want me to give you a tour?
1
Reality: In terms of PPP, Germany and Russia very close. By 2025, Russia will overtake Germany. A recent study has shown that about 1.7 million Britons do not intend to turn on the heating this winter due to a lack of money for it. This is twice as many as last year, since Starmer's Labor government has cancelled pensioner benefits for the coming winter. The number of potential deaths from hypothermia is predicted to be in the thousands. At the same time, London proudly announces that it is allocating a new multi-million tranche for weapons for Ukraine. That is, Boris Johnson's slogan "To the last Ukrainian" can now be extended: "... and to the last British pensioner"!
1
@Thetequilashooter1 Did you know that Bin Laden was associated with American elites? Do you know who nurtured all Islamic terrorism since the proxy war against the USSR in Afghanistan? Well, look at Clinton's confessions - she's just proud of it. Stuff your nonsense about democracy into some hole
1
@Thetequilashooter1 buy glasses - they invaded Afghanistan after September 11. Bought glasses? Read how Bin Laden was connected to the American elites? Second - what difference does it make under what pretext they invaded there and imposed "democracy" for 20 years. What do you remember of a single country that was blessed by American military interventions in the name of democracy?
1
@Thetequilashooter1 so? why they not in EU or NATO? 10 years passed already
1
@Thetequilashooter1 it was not about 'joining EU' stop croaking and go to Donbass and ask ANY LOCAL
1
@Thetequilashooter1 What kind of friendship with the EU can we talk about if the EU continues to trade with Russia, and Poland blocked the transportation of Ukrainian grain through its territory during the war, preventing them from earning money? What kind of EU membership can we talk about if cheap Ukrainian agricultural products instantly destroy farming in Europe?
1
@Thetequilashooter1 Ukraine has been negotiating NATO membership for 16 years and what have they achieved? A few obsolete f-16s and a destroyed country? Putin has clearly spoken about NATO's unacceptability on Ukrainian territory
1
@Thetequilashooter1 Well, Moldova and the Baltics have only become poorer from joining the EU. And Ukraine was the richest republic in the Soviet Union with the production of aircraft, ships and astronautics. They could even have kept Crimea as part of them if they had not pursued an aggressive anti-Russian policy imposed on them by Soros since the 90s.
1
@Thetequilashooter1 let's keep quiet about the 20% below the poverty line in the UK (they're not in the EU) but In terms of PPP, Germany and Russia very close. By 2025, Russia will overtake Germany.
1
@Thetequilashooter1 you're lying again - NATO in Ukraine is the main reason. Donbass has been waiting for a Russian invasion since 2014. But Biden and Zelensky began actively discussing joining NATO in 2021
1
@Thetequilashooter1 Russia had no problem with either Sweden or Finland joining the alliance because Russia had not any territorial conflict as with Ukraine
1
@Thetequilashooter1 in late 2021, Russia proposed a draft treaty on security guarantees aimed at reducing tensions in Europe. This proposal included calls for a new security architecture that would prohibit NATO's further eastward expansion and restrict the deployment of certain types of weapons near Russia's borders. Russia made this offer against the backdrop of a growing crisis surrounding Ukraine, arguing that NATO's expansion posed a threat to its security. However, the United States and its NATO allies rejected these proposals
1
@Thetequilashooter1 The deployment of NATO weapons on Ukrainian territory significantly changes the strategic balance in the region. This is due to the fact that some types of missiles that could be deployed near Russian borders could potentially be equipped with nuclear warheads and used as offensive weapons. The proximity of such weapons systems to Russian territory reduces the missiles’ flight time, which complicates defense and response measures. For Russia, such steps are perceived as a serious threat to national security. The possibility of a quick strike on important strategic facilities is a concern, as it could weaken the country’s ability to effectively respond to a potential threat. This is one of the reasons why Moscow has been so persistent in opposing NATO’s expansion to the east and the deployment of the alliance’s military infrastructure near its borders.
1
Let us imagine a hypothetical situation in which Russia begins to actively arm the Mexican government and discusses the possibility of deploying offensive weapons on Mexican territory, including missiles that could be equipped with nuclear warheads. This would dramatically change the strategic balance in the Western Hemisphere and would cause serious concern for the United States. In response, the United States would most likely perceive such a development as a direct threat to its national security. The proximity of Russian offensive weapons to the US borders would create a situation in which the flight time of missiles to key American cities and military installations would be reduced to a minimum, which would significantly complicate the defense of the country and preparation for a possible retaliatory strike. This would be reminiscent of the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, when the deployment of Soviet missiles to Cuba brought the world to the brink of nuclear war.
1
the thesis about an independent decision to join NATO is untenable, firstly because the countries on whose territory American weapons are deployed cannot control them (Germany), secondly, if such decisions change the balance of power and create a threat to Russia, Russia has every right to respond to potential threats. Putin has spoken about this since 2008 and in 2021 many times
1
@Thetequilashooter1 Well, now Finland and Sweden, having made a stupid decision to lose their neutrality, are suffering economic losses from the loss of the Russian market and cheap raw materials (hello IKEA and hundreds of other companies). Despite the fact that the residents of these countries did not participate in the referendums on this issue - no one asked them. despite the fact that they had no territorial disputes with Russia, Russia never laid claim to the territories of these countries but conducted normal business
1
@Thetequilashooter1 Ukrainian officials fear protests from citizens left without electricity this winter The morale of Ukrainians has already been undermined by failures at the front, writes WP . In addition, Russian attacks on the country's energy sector are also hitting the psyche of citizens. The share of those who are ready to make difficult compromises with Russia for the sake of peace is constantly growing. Zelensky said that Putin is trying to torment ordinary Ukrainians with attacks on the energy sector. But it is not their fate that really worries Ukrainian officials. The fatigue of the population has direct military consequences. The Ukrainian Armed Forces fight on the back of civilian donations and purchases, and this support will certainly decrease in the winter. “We could be in big trouble this winter,” said an anonymous Ukrainian official. People could become completely embittered. “What I fear most is that after such a winter there will be no way to find consensus among the population .”
1
@Thetequilashooter1 ask Blinken
1
@Thetequilashooter1 about YouTube?
1
@Thetequilashooter1 In June 2024, Secretary of State Antony Blinken highlighted the U.S. collaboration with YouTube as part of a broader music diplomacy initiative. Critics argue that by labeling certain views as "disinformation," the U.S. government is effectively stifling legitimate debate, particularly around contentious issues like the war in Ukraine or U.S. foreign policy. They emphasize concerns about state-backed programs and initiatives targeting media outlets and social media platforms, potentially blacklisting conservative or alternative media sources. Such actions, critics claim, blur the line between combating misinformation and infringing on free speech, turning legitimate political discourse into a battleground for government control. The involvement of state-funded entities like the National Endowment for Democracy with groups that monitor or censor media content further fuels fears of government overreach into free speech.
1