Comments by "" (@efghggdxlmfn33) on "Zelensky in USA, pitches Victory plan which is his SURVIVAL PLAN" video.

@mm8u9y7i why don't you play 'Vuhledar already taken' song?
7
@bekeneel The potential emergence of hypersonic—or even supersonic—missiles in the hands of the Yemeni Houthis is causing significant concern in Western countries for several reasons. The first, naturally, is military. Today, the Houthis are shooting down American drones over Yemen; tomorrow, with access to a more advanced arsenal, they could target and destroy an American aircraft carrier or its escorting destroyers with an anti-ship missile. The second concern is economic. Alongside fulfilling their military threats (and the Houthis have made no shortage of bold declarations), they could, for instance, impose tolls on passage through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, allowing free passage only to Russia, China, and their allies. Imagine: "Entrance, one ruble; exit, two." In short, an asymmetric response could be truly asymmetric—delivering a double blow to both military and economic interests
7
@mm8u9y7i spamming from 2 accounts? Damn6 you so stupid
5
@mm8u9y7i If the Americans were to now change their Minutemen-3 and develop a new missile, they would get exactly the same cascade of failures, remind you of the many failures of the American military in their pursuit of hypersonic weapons? Of literally dozens of failed launches and a handful of "partial successes."
4
@mm8u9y7i Russia's opponents are trying to play on those processes and those phenomena that are absolutely inevitable when developing any new weapon. "the dog barks, but the caravan moves on", a similar story happened with the Russian "Bulava" missile. It was also much laughed at in the West because of unsuccessful launches. But the missile was eventually improved, and now "Western partners" are no longer laughing. And don't use that word embarrassing if you can't tell a man from a woman, ahaha
4
@kidpoker537 Translated for nafo fanboys: Clowlensky and co are waiting for the organization of production using Western components, so that when his missiles fly at targets on Russian territory, the West can dismiss what is happening by saying that these are Ukraine's own missiles. Even if there will be only a nameplate and a name like "Neptun-M4" from "Ukroprom". It is possible to organize such donation, it is not possible to make a lot of missiles, but taking into account the existing (and prospective) aircraft fleet of AFU there is no need for a lot of missiles. It is necessary to spoil our lives and to jerk to peremoga (win in ukrainian), dozens of missiles will be enough for that. Will it be different in consequences from the strikes of "Storms" or "Scalps" on Russian territory? No, and the reaction to them must be exactly the same - otherwise NATO will finally become convinced of its own impunity.
4
@bekeneel you exposed your stupidity all your fake accounts
4
@kidpoker537 10 billion for the black hole Ukraine is nothing. Any "production" of missiles in Ukraine is hated by Mr. Iskander. And even if they do not steal the money, but let's say build something underground, this production will be visited by Mr. Zircon. Your croaking about NATO's alleged non-participation in this war is extremely ridiculous. NATO is cowardly hiding behind the backs of poor Ukrainians and openly calls Ukraine its proxy.
4
@kidpoker537 loss ratio 7 ukr to 1 rus
4
@bekeneel What is wrong with AI-censorship on youtube?
4
@kidpoker537 Ukraine becomes the poster child and archetype for the mismatch between NATO’s promises and its material basis of power. It has now been 16 years since Kiev was first enticed with the prospect of NATO membership. But what did they actually get? A wrecked power grid, the loss of 20% of their territory (so far), and hundreds of thousands dead, wounded, or missing. According to the latest published data, there were 2,700,000 disabled people in Ukraine. Up to a third of them have been injured while participating in the battles for Donbass since 2014. Now there are more than 3 million disabled people in the country – we are talking only about those who have lost limbs, disability due to high blood pressure or, for example, due to heart disease, there is no question. The 45 million strong Ukraine that received those lofty promises so long ago is now a shattered and battered husk with perhaps 25 million citizens left. From NATO, they receive too many words and far too few shells, vehicles, and air defense interceptors.
3
The potential emergence of hypersonic—or even supersonic—missiles in the hands of the Yemeni Houthis is causing significant concern in Western countries for several reasons. The first, naturally, is military. Today, the Houthis are shooting down American drones over Yemen; tomorrow, with access to a more advanced arsenal, they could target and destroy an American aircraft carrier or its escorting destroyers with an anti-ship missile. The second concern is economic. Alongside fulfilling their military threats (and the Houthis have made no shortage of bold declarations), they could, for instance, impose tolls on passage through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, allowing free passage only to Russia, China, and their allies. Imagine: "Entrance, one ruble; exit, two." In short, an asymmetric response could be truly asymmetric—delivering a double blow to both military and economic interests
2