Comments by "r baxter" (@rbaxter286) on "Drachinifel" channel.

  1. German, Italian, & Japanese Designs: MORE COUNTER-FLOODING VOIDS!
    98
  2. Sorry, sewer pipes don't get to air just their clean laundry in public.
    20
  3. You have to add the iron workers et al cutting the actual plates and welding if you say the Uncertainty Budget for the physical construction was "0.0000"! You do know the design ALMOST went out with Ordnance designed turrets and barbettes that wouldn't fit the Construction & Repair hull, cuz bureaucracy? That's why there's a knuckle in the hull at turret 1 that throws off an unintended second bow wave where the hull was redesigned to fit the redesigned, but still 'too large' barbette. Hardly an indicator of 'fit perfectly'.
    14
  4. They miss before that first hit, so why not after?! The Uncertainty Budget on the process must be horrendous at range, any idea if anyone ever quantified it for any 'classic' system (with validation by experiment)?
    5
  5. He kinda fit in all over, as far as possible experimentation with Grand Ideas. The problem is, only a few of the Grand Ideas worked out, and even fewer of the 'prophets' did. The context of the Japanese atrocious Bushido culture, this kind of weasel would have fit in ..., but the US was a CIVIL Government and up to now did not allow military interference except in very special circumstances and with changing times rendering the single-minded 'warriors' involved a pariah (e.g., Rickover) when 'mistakes were made' and hubris got out of control ...
    4
  6. Now, now, don't be so hard on yourself.
    4
  7. Wha??? If you can't make sense of his narrations, the problem is not on his side as he is almost as bland as any technocrat I've ever listened to. Heaven help you listen to Lazerpig!
    4
  8. I think your talking about USSR anti-carrier guided missiles?
    3
  9. So he was not right, he was a Stochastic Genius. You know, like the Army's LTA strategic defense catastrophe, as opposed to the alleged success of tactical ASW blimps.
    2
  10. ISTR: 105mm mounts were known for electrical/reliability problems The AA fire control was not up to task The 3 shaft layout and non-wheel conning caused a lot of yawing/control issues causing cruising efficiency issues (e.g., getting to Brest and Mablehead was a VERY small beam and one rudder) The hull aft design was notoriously weak also affecting rudder spacing issues and backup control) and finally, as you note The armor scheme was outdated along with services like fire control communications running outside. Those are especially from Dulin/Garzke reviews. Seems like a lot of those issues could affect your details (i.e., I agree with the DP secondary and over-the-side with the 37mm) or might change the choices. BTW, if you're only dealing with 40mm Bofors on the ship just how 'mass-produced' do you need? BTW, the huge number of ordnance, engineering, and habitability issues with the Marblehead design REALLY shocked me that you didn't list it as one of the inter-war Mistakes.
    2
  11. Nice to hear the word was 'engaged' and not 'fought' for the Mass. Bart was hardly a fight. You might as well ask what was the last one to engage a quay, warehouse, and a truck or two while not actually get sunk by an unfinished floating battery moored near that location. I've read the stories and have not been impressed by that engagement, just like the book by a USS Washington officer who recounted his visit and review of the data behind the action report the day after the SDAK claimed it shot down all those planes (but really didn't).
    2
  12. Social media is entertainment in too many cases as opposed to scholarship/education. The most apparent in the US right now are the channels following the Trump Clown Car/pirate band where there are TREMENDOUS differences between content of channels hosted by bar-admitted lawyers with experience in the actual court systems being used, compared to the semi-partisan channels hosted by people not with such actual professional experience.
    2
  13. Well, give old "The World Wonders", political-PR-treasure Halsey a break. He did learn from his first typhoon, and only did it ONCE again.
    2
  14. Survives, she'd have still been a complete waste of resources that could have FAR BETTER spent on RN escort carriers AND THE AIR ARM for them!! Sorry, the aftermath pretty much showed what would have happened to the Bismark REGARDLESS, with comparative minor loss of shipping. The U-boat menace was the REAL war loser. Thank former Newspaper Sensationalist Churchill for this and the Tirpitz waste of effort. (What demand for fast battleships?! In the minds of the battleship admirals and Churchill, but not in SANE strategists).
    1
  15. Amazing how the only way Jellicoe can be second-guessed is directly due to the UTTER INCOMPETENCE OF BEATTY IN FUNCTIONING AS AN ACTUAL SCOUTING FORMATION!! And yet, the Beatty Sycophants jump on those second-guesses, CAUSED BY BEATTY, to knife Jellicoe in the back for the sake of their own HORRIBLY LIMITED SOCIAL BUTTERFLY WITH AN ADMIRAL COSTUME.
    1
  16. Imagine what would have happened if the IJN hadn't treated the Japanese Army like "foes" ..., in their need to prove THEY were The Favorite Son!
    1
  17. Always amazed how people read what they want to into Mahan, as in what will justify their budgets, personal and governmental. Just a bunch of people who wouldn't or won't think for themselves, without applying the need to PROVE he was or is still relevant to a situation. Mitchell was right in the emerging power of aviation, but grotesquely wrong about the actual technical aspects that only really sorta came to fruition in WW2, although I doubt carriers would have ever overcome a surface action group by themselves especially early in WW2 (HMS Glorious and Leyte sorta shine here). Question is, were there any other actually effective leaders who did not really need Mitchell's acts of bravado to make things happen. After all, Mitchell was very much USN vs. USA in the US defense pig sty for funding and preeminence, especially when the 'Once and Future Lamestream Media' to a hold of that 'huge' story ..., a story meant to prod the ever-present Local Barbershop/YouTube Experts ..., you know like FLERFs and other History Channel Amateur Historians ... MItchell seems to have been a 'Prophetic' Guderian for airpower instead of a post facto 'Genius' Guderian for his (self-asserted) prowess in armor warfare ..., and why Allies should not jail him and NATO should hire him ...
    1
  18. I think there are several books I've read in probably 20 years of interest that highlighted Beatty's scorn for Thomas, and his isolation of Thomas' ships AFTER HE WHINED ABOUT HAVING THEM ASSIGNED TO HIM FOR SO LONG! Massie's Castles of Steel springs to mind as a possible example.
    1
  19. Stopped going to the New Jersey site after I visited the North Carolina and found the normal access areas included all the areas I was actually interested in, which included machinery spaces, fire control spaces, AND barbettes along with much higher areas. Those were all off the NJ tour, even though I EASILY got up to Spot 1 on my own with no real physical limitations. Why waste time on a ship which SHOULD have a lot more resources because of the larger audience they have, but which are shamed by a much more off-the-beaten-trail exhibit site. Similarly, the Charleston site has far more area open for access for SEVERAL ships.
    1
  20. That's actually 4 things, as in that "and" conjunction, and THAT makes 5 things, as in "5. You don't know how to count."
    1
  21. I'd have said Artificial Reefs based on current usage?
    1
  22. Sorry, but even the real Dawn starts out as Civil, Nautical, and Astronomical, and experiments really can't be classified as a 'dawn', anyway. Or, was the Hahn, Strassmann, and Meitner the 'False Dawn" of the nuclear age?! Was the Turbiina the 'False Dawn' of the nuclear propulsion age?!
    1
  23. While social media is entertaining, it is the professional academia offerings on YouTube that I find the most valuable. I don't see social media taking the places of things like Graduate Level institutions and research organizations ..., whose work the better social media will take on board to fashion their product from. However, some people (the Great Unwashed) will prefer Bill Nye Science Guy/Time Team Baldrick as entertainment, but others (including academia) will prefer real academia like the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures for actual hard core research results. You take your choice of Lies We Tell to Children vs. Lies We Tell to Adults vs. Lies We Tell to People Who Can't Do Calculus vs. ... . I really pity the students who only have access to the library reading room, anymore, as compared to the essentially open access to the stacks I had, especially as an engineering student doing their multiple Shakespeare critical papers in Speech & Drama school senior level classes taken as liberal electives.
    1
  24. Seeing as each side had different design criteria and doctrines, how is "Anglo-German Dreadnought Arms Race - Anything you can build I can buidl better!" an accurate title of any professional production?
    1
  25. Previous comment didn't make it. Nagumo wasn't 'dancing', he was a cat playing with a skink until it got bored and then heard it's food bowl being set out.
    1
  26. If the Iowas hadn't been modernized, they'd be razor blades in a city dump, with miscellaneous 'parts-is-parts' laying on some museum's side lawn. Do you think the 'maritime states' like Iowa, Missouri, or Wisconsin would have cared enough to step up to the plate?
    1
  27. Or, the US late war BBs were porkbarrel projects named after states because, as Rickover sorta observed, states vote.
    1
  28. At some point it is NOT COURAGE, but instead HELPLESSNESS in the face of HARSH NAVAL DISCIPLINE and the general systemic ineptitude of naval commanders wholly out of their depth in a kind of warfare NONE had imagined, much like the trench warfare completely overwhelmed any army's ability to function in a truly competent, professional fashion. The industrialization of DEATH was something I'm sure none of these kinds of almost galley slaves deserved to be faced with.
    1
  29. I'd say it did create terminal damage in both cases, just not the terminal damage anyone wanted to deal with. A lot like most risk assessments dismiss out-of-hand, multiple casualties, because it makes analysis 'too hard' ..., of course, Reality doesn't care. as TMI and other Events demonstrate ... At that point, all you have is Barbie & Ken Risk Assessment -> "Risk Assessment is Hard [tee-hee]" What did the ships' systematic risk assessments demonstrate?
    1
  30. Aleutian Campaign was the US military's equivalent of the similarly mediocre Wellington Peninsular Campaign. Both won because the real 2nd and 3rd Team was sent there by the IJN/Napoleon because it really didn't make any difference ..., except to the US and British. Sorta like the English obsession with the ONLY World Cup they have EVER WON! BTW, even at the point this was released, I think the scholarship has pretty much demonstrated there was no "Distracting Campaign" aspect in the IJN plans.
    1
  31. Just dust in dust form is a hazard, and even sugar. The US Chemical Safety Board has an entire video on the Dixie Crystal sugar plant explosion in Georgia, US and resulting destruction of a large factory from 'renegade' sugar in a belt transfer system AND in heaps about the plant. The CSB ALSO has a bunch of similar dust explosions, too! Now, add in the 'out-of-safety-container' charges haphazardly stored in the battlecruiser turrets and barbettes just to satisfy the "SHOOT FAST TO HIT!" 'wives tale' in the RN before Jutland. Also, deflagration is a low order conflagration, as opposed to detonation. I'm assuming everyone here has watched the differences between Russian tanks burning out vs. turret tosses.
    1
  32.  @IronWarhorsesFun  What drivel. You just didn't bother listening to the discussion of the perils of the entire situation, BUT especially, YOU HAVE NOT BOTHERED READING even more important discussions of ALL THE INTENTIONS JELLICOE PUT IN WRITING BEFORE THE BATTLE AND WHICH CHURCHILL AND THE OTHER GRANDSTANDERS ALL AGREED WITH!! I'd say YOU have never been in such a situation of incomplete intelligence to make important decisions on, nor have you done any research on the doctrine Jellicoe CLEARLY ISSUED, and which, in the case of Beatty incompetent mishandling of his scouting duties, many of Jellicoe's detractors clearly DISOBEYED. I may not have had battle pressures on me, but USN nuclear propulsion drills as a watch officer have apparently given me a FAR more balanced view of the perils of leadership, which you so cavalierly ignore.
    1
  33. She went pop right away when you consider how long she was SUPPOSED to last. The Hood lasted decades.
    1
  34. Bigger is better ..., unless like the RN and the KGVs you don't have the determination to make larger because you can't afford the arms race ... Warspite is just a statistically expected result of the fact the RN fired more shells from battleships than any other navy over the lifetime of its entire battleship fleet.
    1
  35. If she had survived ..., she'd have been sunk like Barham in the Med or sent on the B Team Pacific Late War RN Sandbox Force ..., she was never going not to be in service during the war until she plain wore out like Warspite ...
    1
  36. How? You do realize Warspite did NOT sink all those destroyers in Norway by itself, regardless of what the propaganda swill says? Warspite would have been the stock footage 'bookend' to Barham exploding in the Med.
    1
  37. The key is "How were they used?" I don't know the treaty, war planning, or logistics/administrative repercussions of changing them to Fast Battleships, but employment show them not being considered as valuable for their throw-weight as for their speed in employment, and were not 'revered' for their place in the 'final showdown' as were the 'proper battleships'. Was it a question of 'prestige' and maskirovka 'blue smoke and mirrors'? Consider how the Zuikaku and Shokaku were looked down upon because they were not "The Good Ole Boys" of the Kido Butai and then apply that kind of quaint, 'warrior culture' self-delusion to the Kongos, too. Your analysis documents the hard quantitative reasons along with the actual employment qualitative realities, so battlecruiser masquerading as a battleship is good for me, too!
    1
  38. And, the FAR more useful purposes the IJA could serve just about ANYWERE ELSE, as well as the FAR more useful purposes the IJN logistics train to support these bases could serve just about ANYWHERE ELSE!
    1
  39. See Bacon's essay "Of Boldness". Beatty is the POSTER CHILD for that essay, and the harm such poltroons cause.
    1
  40. Great video filling in so much of the stuff you can see but have no tour booklet for! Turret access is nice, but nothing telling you what you're seeing used to be really disappointing. Remember ducking the ropes and climbing to Spot 1 on the NJ. Not as majestic or large as it appears! Guess the Yamato had it beat in the "If looks could kill" category! Figured they owed me something on my 5th visit and no new areas, like the engineering spaces and actual fire control spaces with computers, like on the USS Carolina's self-guided tours. Would love a Friedman-guided tour with all the hatches and access panels opened on both engineering AND fire control (or, a Friedman-graduate-assistant-who-specializes-in-it). I'd also pay for a Brilliant course or the like in the undiluted math and mechanical mechanism design of all the fire control systems, from the ballistics calculus, through the uncertainty evaluations, through the mechanisms against fleet gunnery test salvo sheets and acceptance testing (maybe including the stabilization mechanisms).
    1
  41. Explosion was also allegedly a testament to the dangers of black powder in the AZ's black powder magazine, forward.
    1
  42. “War is progressive because all instruments of war are progressive.” US Grant I remember getting involved with this when first finding Sumida's book on RN pioneering fire control and the Pollen myth of superiority (funny, it was a pre-'clickbait' scholarly book that started and fueled a controversy suitably answered in return salvos like similar controversies surrounding things I remember like variable geometry fighter, fighter bomber, and bomber airfoils, the Phoenix missile system, the F-100 engine that 'doomed' the F-15 and later F-16 (allegedly), the the new-release turbine power unit for the Abrams tank, cruise missiles in strategic and then tactical roles, the M-16 gun, etc). Went back to WWI era USN gunnery manuals and inter-war enlisted 'ratings' manuals as well as the various reference works on interior and exterior ballistics; hoovered up followup books to Sumida along with Jutland histories (from both sides of the battle line), and into the various sensationalist tripe on the Iowa turret blast and the rebuttals by actual technical experts. Also, found the INRO/Warship International volumes and back issues crammed full of things like actual salvo spread diagrams for US and 'other' ships along with the subsequent Fighting Instructions to US captains (boy, were they gonna be surprised when they closed into the EXTREMELY vulnerable zone for the IJN 20" gun instead of moving to a much-more invulnerable zone based on the wrong assumptions, like 16" guns on the Yamato series). Really wish I'd paid more attention to the appropriate calculus physics in my 1st semester Mechanics classes. In the end, it was GLARINGLY obvious to me why big guns got the bums rush they did once military tech emerged from the Dark Ages of mechanical tech and into the electrical and electronics ages. Fortunately, things like the US government investing in aviation in general helped spur the development of tech that made the big gun battle line obsolete for both sides at about the same time, without the USN ending up a generation behind. That need to never be behind has fueled so much USN research, and outright theft of ideas like angel-deck carriers, since that day; some wasted money, some tacitly wasted but still supported (e.g., early Aegis house of cards), and some well invested. The passing of the big gun was a paradigm shift for the navies as big as relativity and 'billions and billions of galaxies!!' was to astrophysics. It just never has had a Thomas Kuhn treatment of it, as far as I remember reading (but, that's not much of a reach, nowadays).
    1