Comments by "Kurt" (@kurt7833) on "'Are You Implying That The Transcript Was Doctored?': Guy Reschenthaler Clashes With Jamie Raskin" video.

  1. Wow he did it again, he is like a router that Mr. Raskin just switches the topic. They submitted modifications. Um Um Um Um Um mum. And well-acted Raskin for the setup for the plausible deniability act for Biden. I Truly don't trust his intentions. Regardless of the characters words being sarcastic the actions are what merits anything.
    4
  2. Thats a silly question rabbit there is no need to Imply what has been submitted into record that already had been modified to a degree. Thus, it is not to imply, when it is to state a fact.
    2
  3. Raskin diverted the reason for the audio release by his sarcastic stated, irrelevant comparison question. what was it again? just because the media ask for it should they get it. They asked for Trumps, irrelevant 1st of all but didn't he- they destroy their Trumps J6 meetings and minutes records? Let's have the tapes!!
    1