Comments by "1IbramGaunt" (@1IbramGaunt) on "Classified Challenger 2 Documents Posted by Gamer" video.

  1.  @papalegba6759  yeah suuuuuure, think we can all see where your allegiances lie now lol
    4
  2. Ever heard the expression "quality over quantity"
    4
  3.  @siko9799  literally the only one they have that can definitely take out a fully-equipped fully-armed Challenger 2 (and I mean DEFINITELY take it out, not just maybe stand a fighting chance if it gets lucky, like all the others with their paper armour and ancient guns) is the T-14 Armata- IF the T-14 Armata is actually the badass Abrams-killer the Russians make it out to be and it's not in fact a T-55 with a fancy body-shell (see North Korea's latest tanks). And how many of those does Russia have? OH YEAH ONLY THE SAME AMOUNT WE DO OF CHALLY'S
    2
  4.  @alganhar1  couldn't agree more but you and I are talking to a brick wall there I suspect (a crumbling broken ex-Soviet brick wall covered in German graffiti to be exact lol)
    2
  5.  @siko9799  not if it's 2 or 3 hundred Challengers backed up by thousands of other tanks of our ALLIES they won't, all the Abrams, Leopard 2's, Ariete's & Leclerc's that NATO can muster in the area, along with all the older Russian tanks of the former Warsaw Pact countries to boot, and that's not even including all the infantry, artillery, aircraft and lighter vehicles with their assorted anti-tank weaponry. Pretty difficult to overwhelm one particular tank-force if they've got plenty of friends all around them ready & willing to back them up, and there's a LOOOOTT of those friends in between Russia and Great Britain. Also there's the minor matter that each Challenger's frontal Dorchester depleted-uranium composite armour (which is now fitted on not just the turret but the lower plate and sides too when going into battle) is virtually impenetrable to any known battlefield weapon, and is widely regarded as the single strongest tank-armour in the world. As for Russian armour, by comparison? On older models like the T-72? See every tank-battle of either Gulf War for the proven effectiveness of that lol
    2
  6.  @siko9799  as for you being American well I'm sorry for assuming you were a Russian troll if so, but if you ARE American you should know as well as I do the truth of what I said before there, hell your own Abrams tanks use British-designed Chobham DU composite armour themselves, which Dorchester is just a more advanced version of, and you should DEFINITELY know the sheer power that a combined NATO force can bring to bear against anything the Russians try
    2
  7.  @siko9799  oh yeah and I never claimed that just because a tank's Russian that makes it automatically bad, I simply don't think they're any match for the most powerful & advanced Western designs, the only possible exceptions being the latest T-90 and T-14 models, but even THEY are just that, a near-peer match for Western armour, doesn't mean they can actually defeat NATO does it
    2
  8. They're destroyers not frigates
    1
  9.  @XxermandxX  tell that to the Iraqi army
    1