Comments by "" (@imshulei) on "South China Morning Post" channel.

  1. 5
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. If you come from Europe and America, maybe you are not British or Spanish French, these countries used to colonize everywhere in all continents of the world, but do not develop the local grassroots construction, they only ask for endless local resources, regardless of the development of the local people, maybe they do not regard the locals as their own people, but slaves, and this situation has lasted for at least a hundred years, and the local residents to the present time, many of the country's Aboriginal population has been less than half a million, which is forgotten in history, and even those who live now have not received any apology or compensation from the colonizers, since Europe and the United States are so developed, why is there no one to help build Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia? Is it because there is no profit to be made, or because they only want to receive short term gains, and that's what's getting in the way? Isn't it most common that European and American companies never take 10 years as the benchmark for doing things, and that they are greedy for short-term benefits such as one or two years? So this can explain why the European and American companies in Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia, South America, these countries will never help them to do infrastructure, because they are the first to worry about is not able to make money, not able to recover the investment, and they also do not trust the local government, then I ask you a question, that Africa and South America and South Asia, the country's society and livelihood should be stagnant? If China doesn't participate in these programs, what other countries will? Shouldn't the people in developing countries enjoy the convenience of life? @Peter-be5lo 
    1
  25. India simply does not seem to have the capacity to help other countries with infrastructure development in a world where the only people who can help some countries with infrastructure development are China, the United States and some of the P5 countries, isn't it? Come to think of it, most of the countries in the world are still lagging behind in terms of infrastructure and do not have high speed railroads. So, can you tell me how much investment by India or similar countries has improved the overall society in other countries? Regarding your comment on Sri Lanka's bankruptcy, I have already said that Chinese investment in Sri Lanka lags behind Europe, USA and Japan, so what makes you think that it must be China that caused Sri Lanka's bankruptcy? What is your basis for this? Why should China, which is lagging behind in investment, be held responsible? This is like blaming China for everything, does it make sense? Regarding your comment about leasing ports and land, you are only talking about China, why not the US? The US has hundreds of bases all over the world, leases land in other countries, and some countries even pay for US military expenses, why don't you mention that? And China doesn't have troops in those countries, the US actually has troops in those countries, Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Australia, Germany, and that makes it reasonable and legal for the US to do so? China is only doing it for economic purposes and has no military presence, so that makes it unreasonable? @Peter-be5lo 
    1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1