Youtube comments of (@imshulei).
-
235
-
65
-
54
-
50
-
10
-
7
-
@downundabrotha Why can't Northern Ireland become independent? Does this also mean that the majority of Hong Kong people don't support independence, you forget one thing, there are many silent people, just like the situation in Northern Ireland, except that the Northern Irish didn't start the violence, but do you know what the British government would have done to them if they had, and also during the British colonial period in Hong Kong, the leaders, the governors, all of them were British citizens, and the British gave a high degree of freedom to the people of Hong Kong. and fairness to the people of Hong Kong? The policies you mentioned were all formulated by Britain on an ad hoc basis before the reunification of Hong Kong. If uk really love the people of Hong Kong, why did you not give them the greatest fairness and freedom before that? Or is this just a hidden bomb planted before the handover to interfere with the ruling of the Chinese Government? We know it very well, Britain has done this kind of thing in India too
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Chowsingsing2006 Even your world-first passport is useless if you don't have the money to afford travelling, which could explain the fact that there are so many Europeans and Americans who have never travelled long distances,On the contrary, if you are a mainland Chinese with a good financial situation, you just need to provide the documents, it is now not a problem to go to any country, and this standard is not high, just need you have a stable job, income in the middle of the level, once you get the European Union visa, then the other countries are not a problem
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@behzodfozilov4963 Why are you avoiding the second half of my Native American conversation? Let me tell you, over 10 million is the number of Uyghurs in the entire territory of China, but a few decades ago, there were only 2-3 million people, if the Chinese government banned the development of the Uyghurs, the easiest thing would not be to ban their birth numbers and turn them into a smaller and smaller population, refer to the Native American population and culture disappearance route, have you ever seen a government persecute an ethnic group, but let them grow in population? Native Americans, Maori, Australian Aborigines, according to the population of the local countries, are there more than half a million people? But going back hundreds of years, there were literally hundreds of thousands of people.???
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Many people who received their basic education in China have benefited from China's fair college entrance examination system and have entered prestigious universities such as Peking University and Tsinghua University, where tuition is only $1,000 per year. I believe that these two groups of people were the beneficiaries of China's initial policies, but these two groups of people did not experience the benefits of China. The first group saw more culture and institutions and started to indiscriminately attack China, disliked China and thought everything in the West was better than China The second group, just because the Chinese government introduced policies to curb their capital expansion, also started to indiscriminately attack the Chinese system, and I would say that these two groups are selfish. In fact, this is very much in line with the mainstream values of Western countries, but Chinese people who harbor hatred, even if they live abroad, cannot leave China and keep watching China's development, the fact is that the better China develops, the more unhappy they are and cannot integrate into Western countries, even this part will cheat Chinese people overseas, I really cannot understand this kind of thinking, these people are the beneficiaries of China's system, why would they Why do they become like this? Is the Western system necessarily suitable for China? Do we have to follow the same path of development? It has been proven that under a multi-party system, China's infrastructure and economy could not have developed as fast and had no chance to stick to industrialization. In the early days, China was the world's factory, synonymous with cheap labor, and if large amounts of foreign capital had entered and controlled China's economy, China itself would not have produced high-tech companies that were truly its own. Because of the large amount of labor, foreign capital would not let China develop too fast, because that would lead to an excessive increase in labor costs, and the best result would be that China would be like Southeast Asia now. What really happens is that we Asians, in the position of the Wall Street consortium, are just labor machines, and they do not want the whole Asia to develop fast, just like Europeans and Americans colonized Africa for centuries, and what did that bring them development?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Из-за влияния России в Центральной Азии и на Кавказе энергоресурсы Казахстана не могут транспортироваться через другие страны, а Россия также обладает большим количеством энергоресурсов и является конкурентом Казахстана, поэтому Казахстану следует больше обмениваться и сотрудничать с другими странами Центральной Азии и Китаем, и если Казахстан будет сотрудничать со странами одного уровня силы, такими как Китай и Россия, Россия не будет представлять большой угрозы для Казахстана. Казахстану. Учитывая, что Китай и другие страны имеют большие инвестиции в Казахстане, Россия не будет делать ничего, что могло бы навредить Китаю. Проще говоря, сотрудничая с Китаем, другая сторона больше сосредотачивается на экономических интересах и не вмешивается во внутренние дела других стран
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Star&shine But doesn't the U.S. often impose economic sanctions? In terms of maturity, this is indeed a confrontation between the two countries, just like the Soviet Union during the Cold War, because China does threaten the United States in some areas, such as some high-tech industries, and the military. Take the high-tech industry, Japan's Toshiba and France's Alstom, both former ah, followed by Huawei, except that the former is competing in an operating environment that is completely suppressed by the U.S. government. By definition, isn't this also the case with Tiktok? But on second thought, if the Chinese government, like the Japanese and South Korean governments, were willing to lower its posture and lead the United States as a cooperative ally, would the United States really not sanction China? Probably the final result is that China is reduced to the world's factory, because there is a lot of population, as the world's cheap labor, but also can not develop their own high-tech industries, to improve their national strength and international status, just like Russia several times want to join NATO, but NATO EU does not want it to join, because Europe wants to have imaginary enemies, so that NATO will not disintegrate, Russia's several concessions have not been respected by the other side. Of course, there are many friendly people in Europe and the US, but look at those governments, isn't it because of the rapid development of China that makes them do this? Why wasn't there a lot of international opposition to China and sanctions against it 15 or 20 years ago? And the news about China was not at all as intensive then as it is now. Let me ask a question, are Europe and the US also concerned about countries that are not competitive? There are so many countries in Africa and South America with large territories and populations that are seen as competitors by Europe and the United States? And many of these countries are also democratically elected, so why is it that the European and American systems have not helped the economic and social stability of these countries to develop at all either? Would the European and American systems really be suitable for China? If you are from Hong Kong, I can understand that you do not have the background of living in mainland China for a long time. It is true that many Hong Kong people do not consider themselves Asian citizens and think in a Western stance, but realistically, have you ever paid attention to Hong Kong people who have immigrated to the UK and whether most of them have become better off? Of course the UK welcomes rich immigrants, many Hong Kong people have high paying jobs in Hong Kong and when they arrive in the UK they can only work at the grassroots level, do the British really respect the newly arrived Hong Kong immigrants? Then why can't they become British citizens after going there for almost two years? Obviously, the British government is also selective and does not want too much low-end labor to stay in the UK. This group of Hong Kong people are competing with refugees from other countries for jobs, even most Hong Kong people have never been to mainland China and get their information entirely from the media to perfect their knowledge, so I would like to ask, do you have any experience of living in mainland China for a long time? I can understand that the sense of superiority that Hong Kong people used to have because of their economic development is now gone, we are often jealous of students who are poorer than us but do better than us in their studies because one constant is that people never pay attention to a non-existent, completely non-threatening student who is not above a class
1
-
@Star&shine Japan and South Korea, in essence, have a U.S. military presence, and the country's diplomacy, regarding the military, has been unable to be independent, just like publishing some news internationally requires following the U.S. point of view, doesn't it? And the U.S. military presence in Asia, but also to have a voice in Asia, in the beginning is to contain the development of China and Russia, ask you a question, which country in the world has the most troops stationed overseas? If it is the desire for world peace, why should a country from another state come and meddle in Asian affairs? Can't Asian countries decide their own internal affairs? As you supposedly pretend to be neutral, while the war in Ukraine was going on, did you previously administer justice to those who died because of the war in Afghanistan and Syria, and even as early as Iraq? Our minds are extremely susceptible to the media and we don't think independently, so why are you so convinced when you see the English news that you no longer seek the truth?
1
-
@Star&shine A large country, with growing economic and military development, but this country is not subject to the constraints and leadership of the United States, but also able to communicate with the United States on an equal footing, which is the most important reason why China is subject to the developed countries of the world ........ Even the EU, can they talk to the US on an equal footing? Look at what is happening in the international arena now, the EU had to accept the US leading their affairs for the war in Ukraine, and the result was a rise in energy and rising prices throughout Europe, if China keeps developing steadily, what is the state of affairs for the next 30 years? It is very scary, which countries are the least happy to see the rapid development of China? Do you really think that Asians have equal access to the world's resources in the eyes of European and American governments?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@niccoarcadia4179 India's business market is not favourable to foreign capitalists, many manufacturing companies that enter the Indian market are gradually withdrawing because when you make a large profit, the Indian government needs you to come up with more profit, and if you don't, you will rebel against the illegality, and this time has already happened to the Japanese companies, the European companies, and the Chinese companies, and to the manufacturing industry in India, which is clearly of a lower quality than that of China, or else why did Apple plan to move some of its factories back to China? I don't think you want to receive an iPhone made in India either, India only has a large population as of now
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nguyenhoanganh4586 Modern Vietnam uses Latin, but Chinese characters have been used for thousands of years, so why doesn't Vietnam create its own script? Thousands of years is enough, also the ancient Chinese emperors only asked Vietnam to pay tribute every year, they didn't force Vietnam to use Chinese characters, also Vietnam's imperial examination system was learned from ancient China, or is your point that Vietnam invented the imperial examination system first? When it comes to gender equality, Vietnamese women nowadays have a much lower status, right?... There are so many more incidents of domestic violence than in China, that's why I asked Vietnamese girls, and most of them admitted it, and many of the men are violent and controlling
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nguyenhoanganh4586 Can you not take this out of context? He was not the architect of the entire Forbidden City, he presided over the reconstruction of some of the buildings, of course he was a participant and partially accomplished, and the entire Forbidden City has been there since the Yuan Dynasty, and was rebuilt during the Ming Dynasty, There are still a large number of purely Chinese characters on the ancient buildings of Vietnam, you can go to Hue to check it out, which boasts a large number of buildings in Chinese characters, and the emperor's chambers are entirely in Chinese characters Hanoi has a large number of buildings in Chinese characters as well, Văn Miếu Hà Nội, Đ Văn Miếu Hà Nội, Đ ền Ngọc Sơn, wherever it is related to history, Chinese characters can be found everywhere. In the past, the rich families and aristocrats of Vietnam prioritized the learning and use of Chinese characters, and Chinese characters were used in the imperial exams as well
1
-
@nguyenhoanganh4586 In the past, Chinese culture influenced all of East Asia, Japan invented its own script based on Chinese characters, Korea and Vietnam used Chinese characters exclusively in the early days, and most of the commoners did not know how to write, in the later days, the rulers invented their own country's scripts for use among the commoners, but the aristocrats and the rulers still gave preference to the use of Chinese characters as a written script, China's influence faded away with the entry of the European invaders into East Asia, Korea was occupied by Japan Vietnam was occupied by France, and China was invaded en masse by more European colonizers in modern times, by this time China had no time to care about the neighboring countries that paid tribute, and all aspects of its influence disappeared, but the influence that it had had on the neighboring countries for thousands of years of its history could not be lost, and this is reflected in some of the festivals, costumes, and ancient architecture, and in modern times these countries, some of which are not fully independent, like Japan and South Korea which were stationed by the U.S. But the culture has preserved its traditions, while being influenced by Western culture, as is the case with Vietnam, but with a more independent diplomacy
1
-
@nguyenhoanganh4586 In the past, Chinese culture influenced all of East Asia, such as Confucianism and Confucius, Japan invented its own writing based on Chinese characters, Korea and Vietnam only used Chinese characters in the early days, most civilians could not write, As European invaders entered East Asia, Chinese influence faded away, Korea was occupied by Japan and Vietnam was occupied by France. In modern times, more European colonizers invaded China in a big way. At this time, China had no time to care about the neighboring countries that paid tribute to it, and all aspects of its influence disappeared, but China's influence on the neighboring countries over thousands of years of history could not disappear, which was reflected in some festivals, costumes, and ancient architecture. In recent times, the culture of these countries has retained its own traditions while being influenced by Western culture, as is the case with Vietnam
1
-
1
-
@nguyenhoanganh4586 European culture has really influenced Asia for only a hundred years or so, before that most Asian countries knew nothing about Latin alphabet and European culture, that was the feudal dynasty era, so what script was used in Vietnam at that time? We are discussing history, not the present, you always change the topic to the present, I never denied that Vietnam is using Latin alphabet now, that was invented by the French, it also made it easy for people to learn and lowered the illiteracy rate, also you always say that China was invaded by the Yuan dynasty and Europe, I never denied that either, but did the Mongols come to China and change the native culture? Even Mongol emperors and nobles started to learn Chinese culture, Chinese language and Confucius doctrine and did not require all commoners to learn Mongolian. It was because the Mongols were not good at ruling that the Yuan dynasty only existed for a hundred years or so, and after the Ming dynasty the Qing dynasty once again became the masters, and the leadership still took the initiative to learn the Chinese language and culture, and half of the officials within the government were Han Chinese, which is what I am discussing with you! You never answered my question, Vietnam has been using Chinese characters for thousands of years? It also took the initiative to learn the teachings of Confucius and increase the imperial examination system. Did China force Vietnam to learn it? Why are you avoiding the question?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nguyenhoanganh4586 Chinese tourists can read the Chinese characters on temples and pagodas and other ancient buildings, who told you Chinese can't? Chinese people who graduated from high school know what the characters on ancient buildings in Vietnam mean, provided they are in Chinese characters, part of the ancient buildings in Vietnam are entirely in Chinese characters, and part of them are Chữ Nôm as you said, all my Vietnamese friends who studied Chinese know this fact, so why don't you recognize it? The use of Chinese characters is also part of Vietnam's history, if you don't recognize it, it means you don't recognize your own country's history, it's too low self-esteem. I repeat, all my Vietnamese friends who study Chinese know this history, and although they sometimes don't like China's behavior very much, they are completely objective and honest about this history
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nguyenhoanganh4586 Many folk literature works use Chữ Nôm characters, but official documents and historians use classical Chinese when recording history. This is the same situation in ancient China and Korea. The written language is the same, but the spoken language is different. I am Chinese, and I know the difference between Chinese characters and Chữ Nôm, but you don't know because you don't understand Chinese characters or Chữ Nôm, so you can't tell the difference between them. Many ancient buildings in Vietnam use pure Chinese characters, which are in the form of classical Chinese, and sometimes some Chinese poems and some classic Chinese idioms. You can also search this book, <Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư> It completely uses Chinese characters to record Vietnamese history. This book comes from the official Vietnamese, so the result is obvious. The answer is obvious. Stop saying this is Chữ Nôm... Japanese, Koreans, and Europeans all know clearly that this is completely traditional Chinese characters. Even Japanese people understand the meaning of some words. Do Japanese also learn Chữ Nôm?
1
-
@nguyenhoanganh4586 Many folk literature works use Chữ Nôm characters, but official documents and historians use classical Chinese when recording history. This is the same situation in ancient China and Korea. The written language is the same, but the spoken language is different. I am Chinese, and I know the difference between Chinese characters and Chữ Nôm, but you don't know because you don't understand Chinese characters or Chữ Nôm, so you can't tell the difference between them. Many ancient buildings in Vietnam use pure Chinese characters, which are in the form of classical Chinese, and sometimes some Chinese poems and some classic Chinese idioms. You can also search this book, <Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư> It completely uses Chinese characters to record Vietnamese history. This book comes from the official Vietnamese, so the result is obvious. The answer is obvious. Stop saying this is Chữ Nôm... Japanese, Koreans, and Europeans all know clearly that this is completely traditional Chinese characters. Even Japanese people understand the meaning of some words. Do Japanese also learn Chữ Nôm?
1
-
@nguyenhoanganh4586 Many folk literature works use Chữ Nôm characters, but official documents and historians use classical Chinese when recording history. This is the same situation in ancient China and Korea. The written language is the same, but the spoken language is different. I am Chinese, and I know the difference between Chinese characters and Chữ Nôm, but you don't know because you don't understand Chinese characters or Chữ Nôm, so you can't tell the difference between them. Many ancient buildings in Vietnam use pure Chinese characters, which are in the form of classical Chinese, and sometimes some Chinese poems and some classic Chinese idioms. You can also search this book, <Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư> It completely uses Chinese characters to record Vietnamese history. This book comes from the official Vietnamese, so the result is obvious. The answer is obvious. Stop saying this is Chữ Nôm... Japanese, Koreans, and Europeans all know clearly that this is completely traditional Chinese characters. Even Japanese people understand the meaning of some words. Do Japanese also learn Chữ Nôm?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bro, didn't you always say the Communist Party would fall? How come it hasn't collapsed after so many years of conflict between China and the US? And the infrastructure and income is getting higher and higher, of course, compared with the developed countries are still far from it, then I take China's first, second and third tier compared with Japan and South Korea, okay? In these cities, college students just graduated about 4,000 yuan, Japan and South Korea is less than 10,000 yuan, Japan and South Korea how many years of development, how many people, China how many years of development, how many people? Of course, China's population is so large that it is not comparable on a per capita basis, but the population of the first, second and third tiers is also larger than the total population of Japan and South Korea, right? According to you, there should be hundreds of millions of unemployed people in China, and the wage drop is a few thousand, I think you are pretending to be blind, right? Take the recent years to represent the past and future development? Brother, the 60s famine, so bitter have not collapsed, now as long as the economy is a little close to the gradual collapse? Basic logic does not make sense ah ......
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You guys have done a lot more bad things than China, colonizing the local areas, stealing the local resources without building up the local areas, most places don't even have a wide road, let alone a railroad, and this went on for at least a hundred years, and this is one of the reasons why Africa and certain other continents are so slow to develop now, do you admit it? Do you dare to say that this behavior is more positive than China's business practices? How dare you talk about land? Didn't you use cannons and guns to force others to surrender their land? And it's an entire continent's worth of land, if you don't obey I'll slaughter you all, if you comply I won't allow you to learn your own language, slowly make your culture disappear, slowly reduce your population, and finally gradually integrate into this new country (which it doesn't really integrate)🙃 @Peter-be5lo
1
-
1
-
If you come from Europe and America, maybe you are not British or Spanish French, these countries used to colonize everywhere in all continents of the world, but do not develop the local grassroots construction, they only ask for endless local resources, regardless of the development of the local people, maybe they do not regard the locals as their own people, but slaves, and this situation has lasted for at least a hundred years, and the local residents to the present time, many of the country's Aboriginal population has been less than half a million, which is forgotten in history, and even those who live now have not received any apology or compensation from the colonizers, since Europe and the United States are so developed, why is there no one to help build Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia? Is it because there is no profit to be made, or because they only want to receive short term gains, and that's what's getting in the way? Isn't it most common that European and American companies never take 10 years as the benchmark for doing things, and that they are greedy for short-term benefits such as one or two years? So this can explain why the European and American companies in Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia, South America, these countries will never help them to do infrastructure, because they are the first to worry about is not able to make money, not able to recover the investment, and they also do not trust the local government, then I ask you a question, that Africa and South America and South Asia, the country's society and livelihood should be stagnant? If China doesn't participate in these programs, what other countries will? Shouldn't the people in developing countries enjoy the convenience of life? @Peter-be5lo
1
-
India simply does not seem to have the capacity to help other countries with infrastructure development in a world where the only people who can help some countries with infrastructure development are China, the United States and some of the P5 countries, isn't it? Come to think of it, most of the countries in the world are still lagging behind in terms of infrastructure and do not have high speed railroads. So, can you tell me how much investment by India or similar countries has improved the overall society in other countries? Regarding your comment on Sri Lanka's bankruptcy, I have already said that Chinese investment in Sri Lanka lags behind Europe, USA and Japan, so what makes you think that it must be China that caused Sri Lanka's bankruptcy? What is your basis for this? Why should China, which is lagging behind in investment, be held responsible? This is like blaming China for everything, does it make sense? Regarding your comment about leasing ports and land, you are only talking about China, why not the US? The US has hundreds of bases all over the world, leases land in other countries, and some countries even pay for US military expenses, why don't you mention that? And China doesn't have troops in those countries, the US actually has troops in those countries, Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Australia, Germany, and that makes it reasonable and legal for the US to do so? China is only doing it for economic purposes and has no military presence, so that makes it unreasonable? @Peter-be5lo
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bro, didn't you always say the Communist Party would fall? How come it hasn't collapsed after so many years of conflict between China and the US? And the infrastructure and income is getting higher and higher, of course, compared with the developed countries are still far from it, then I take China's first, second and third tier compared with Japan and South Korea, okay? In these cities, college students just graduated about 4,000 yuan, Japan and South Korea is less than 10,000 yuan, Japan and South Korea how many years of development, how many people, China how many years of development, how many people? Of course, China's population is so large that it is not comparable on a per capita basis, but the population of the first, second and third tiers is also larger than the total population of Japan and South Korea, right? According to you, there should be hundreds of millions of unemployed people in China, and the wage drop is a few thousand, I think you are pretending to be blind, right? Take the recent years to represent the past and future development? Brother, the 60s famine, so bitter have not collapsed, now as long as the economy is a little close to the gradual collapse? Basic logic does not make sense ah ......
1
-
1
-
@zlbgk84 Our social credit refers to those who owe huge sums of money for borrowing and not paying back, when the amount owed reaches a certain amount, it will be published on the government website, usually hundreds of thousands dollars, millions of yuan, which will have an impact on their lives, for example, they can not use the plane to travel, they can only take the slow car, but there is no other major impact, If they are found to have property in their names and refuse to pay back the money, there is a risk of going to jail, and there are also some Those who have committed offences can also be checked after their release from prison to see if they have a record of having been in prison.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bro, didn't you always say the Communist Party would fall? How come it hasn't collapsed after so many years of conflict between China and the US? And the infrastructure and income is getting higher and higher, of course, compared with the developed countries are still far from it, then I take China's first, second and third tier compared with Japan and South Korea, okay? In these cities, college students just graduated about 4,000 yuan, Japan and South Korea is less than 10,000 yuan, Japan and South Korea how many years of development, how many people, China how many years of development, how many people? Of course, China's population is so large that it is not comparable on a per capita basis, but the population of the first, second and third tiers is also larger than the total population of Japan and South Korea, right? According to you, there should be hundreds of millions of unemployed people in China, and the wage drop is a few thousand, I think you are pretending to be blind, right? Take the recent years to represent the past and future development? Brother, the 60s famine, so bitter have not collapsed, now as long as the economy is a little close to the gradual collapse? Basic logic does not make sense ah ......
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bro, didn't you always say the Communist Party would fall? How come it hasn't collapsed after so many years of conflict between China and the US? And the infrastructure and income is getting higher and higher, of course, compared with the developed countries are still far from it, then I take China's first, second and third tier compared with Japan and South Korea, okay? In these cities, college students just graduated about 4,000 yuan, Japan and South Korea is less than 10,000 yuan, Japan and South Korea how many years of development, how many people, China how many years of development, how many people? Of course, China's population is so large that it is not comparable on a per capita basis, but the population of the first, second and third tiers is also larger than the total population of Japan and South Korea, right? According to you, there should be hundreds of millions of unemployed people in China, and the wage drop is a few thousand, I think you are pretending to be blind, right? Take the recent years to represent the past and future development? Brother, the 60s famine, so bitter have not collapsed, now as long as the economy is a little close to the gradual collapse? Basic logic does not make sense ah ......
1