Comments by "Gareth Hart" (@tgheretford) on "The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters"
channel.
-
637
-
487
-
423
-
376
-
338
-
316
-
253
-
191
-
183
-
181
-
172
-
161
-
146
-
137
-
123
-
121
-
119
-
75
-
67
-
64
-
61
-
60
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
52
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
47
-
46
-
45
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The uncomfortable truth is that men are also invisible, and not just when they're 18-24. If you lack high social status, live with your parents or rent (an apartment or small house), do not have independence through your own transport, lack a well paid job, under six foot, have average to below physical and facial attractiveness, good health and in particular the one thing that damns the advice telling men to wait until their thirties and the appliance of SMV universally, lack dating, relationship and pre-selection experience, you will always be invisible. Women have a biological clock, men have an experience clock.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
@RoganGunn The issue is going to be when people argue that Lineker was treated differently to others, leading to employers and service providers being given a solution - a Universal Code of Conduct that all employees (and employers as they lead by example) and service users have to agree to as part of their legally binding contract. It will ensure anyone who has a job, a bank account or an Internet connection agrees to behave and speak in a way that doesn't offend, is abusive, causes harassment, is discriminatory and so forth. All sounds like good intentions, no-one would disagree, right?
Until you realise that it can be used for political or ideological ends. Anyone who believes a woman is an adult human female would be in trouble because that would be considered transphobic, a violation and therefore actionable as one example.
If this seems far fetched, such a policy has already been implemented. If you contribute to Free and Open Source software, chances are, you already agreed to abide by a Code of Conduct. The Contributor Covenant is the one that is used in FOSS.
That will likely be the outcome of what happens post Lineker.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Already talk of 55p per kWh when I was paying just over 10p per kWh for electric a year ago. And for gas, 25p per kWh when it's currently 4p per kWh. Never mind a £3,000 cap, it could easily be £5,000 by October or earlier if Ofgem enacts exceptional circumstance clause to increase the cap earlier. 20-50p on many food and drink items before this spike which adds up to tens of pounds on a weekly food bill. Rent up, bus fares up, petrol up, broadband considerably up, mobile phone contracts up, council tax up and this is before the NI increase. Meanwhile you can bet your wages will be frozen, hours cut, jobs lost, automation and outsourcing takes over. This is going to be grim. Meanwhile we're told this is the price of freedom by those who can easily afford these increases.
The Government needs to take emergency measures now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We have politicians and commentators saying we are at war. With who? If it were Putin, that would be seen as a declaration of war and a massive escalation. So if not him, who? The general public who dare use energy for heat and light? Small and medium size enterprises employing people and contributing to the economy?
I've heard of predictions of over £7,000 bills for consumers for April 2023, a figure that was considered hyperbolic and unrealistic only a few weeks ago - and the predictions just keep rising - above £1 per kWh. It won't be long before we see the first £10,000 price cap prediction. The price cap is delaying the inevitable that is reality now for businesses. We're not at inflation busting water bills after the drought and sewage scandals, high interest rates, escalating rents, above inflation broadband and telecom bills, soaring public transport fares, massive food price rises, three or four day weeks, closure of national infrastructure such as the terrestrial broadcasting and communication networks and other consequences yet. And if we have a cold winter, all bets are off. Meanwhile Putin burns gas near the Finnish border to mock and belittle us while his citizens see inflation in Russia peak and decline.
When Richard Tice who supports free market capitalism is suggesting force majeure and capping prices, it's serious. This is a cost of lockdown, cost of green and cost of Ukraine. Lack of backbone against authoritarians, lack of investment in vital infrastructure and a desire to virtue signal even if means destroying the living standards of their citizens. It makes me sick.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You are correct in raising the point of how a robot, machine or computer can work twenty four hours a day. No human can. We can't compete. And that's before we get to wages, pensions, sick pay, holiday, health insurance, toilet breaks, rest periods, sleep, maternity/paternity leave, strikes, workers rights and I could go on. Automation is inevitable. Ban or restrict it and other countries will take the investment, business and revenue. The question will be how do we deal with all the unemployable individuals?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
All the free-to-air broadcasters will close their outlets when the BBC goes online only and the commercial sector will follow them, unable to pay the transmitter running fees. GB News and TalkTV/TalkRadio included. Without the free-to-air broadcasters, the paywalled streaming services, all run by American outlets bar Spotify, even Sky is now owned by an American conglomerate, will introduce paywalls, increase existing prices and continue to push woke ideology. While YouTube's opposition will be blocked by UK ISPs along with the VPNs that allow access to "harm" and "misinformation" under the forthcoming Online Safety Bill.
From the rhetoric of the Culture Secretary and the Government, it's not just the BBC and Channel 4 they have an issue with, its the fact that people are consuming media for free at the point of use. But I don't see what is British about abolishing our media industry and handing it over to woke American conglomerates to monopolise? Don't get me wrong, there are many issues with the BBC, Channel 4. ITV, Channel 5, LBC et al but I don't see how nuking everything and allowing the Americans to take over with woke ideology will accomplish?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And by doing this, the shy, reserved, damaged, sheltered, anti-social, nerds, cowards, bookworms, musanthropes, fringe people and if could add introverts, eccentrics and recluse, now get labelled as extremist, dangerous and on a level of unpopularity and hatred usually only reserved for people who get ten years to life in prison. Is this how we want to treat men who have broken no laws (yet) and their only fault is to not have a partner?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1