Comments by "Gareth Hart" (@tgheretford) on "Asmongold TV " channel.

  1. The general rule is that unless it impacts women in any way, it will be ignored, dismissed and assumed to not exist. Society is gynocentric in nature.
    29
  2. The last time I checked, the cost of a matchmaking service is so much more than someone will likely ever pay for a Tinder subscription but for a good reason - they have a limited time to do their job once and only once.
    17
  3. They've successfully redefined hooking-up as dating.
    3
  4. Was he bald when they met? Even then, you have one data point and could easily be an exception within a margin of error. Otherwise it would be easy for 100% of people to have a partner and all Governments would need to do is mandate dating apps for everyone. Except that isn't reality.
    2
  5. I would argue that femcels can not exist. In terms of humans, women bear the most cost of reproduction and as stated by Briffault's Law, it is women who determine the conditions of mating and dating as a result. Femcels either reject all the men who show them interest or remain single for the rest of their lives. Both are choices. Men do not choose if women find them unattractive.
    2
  6.  @stoic521  What an odd thing to say.
    2
  7. Said men don't need to form relationships. They're the small percentile of high attractive, status men who always have options and therefore don't need to commit. Meanwhile the men who would commit and want a relationship are simply invisible. The only way to win a rigged game is to not play.
    1
  8. They're going on an app that has successfully convinced them that hooking-up is dating and then get mad when the top percentile of men they chase simply rail and bail on them while refusing to commit to a life long relationship with them because they have options unlike the majority of men.
    1
  9. May be different under US law but under UK law, there is no requirement for it to be done more than once. Harassment is simply "when they make the victim feel distressed, humiliated, threatened or fearful of further violence". There was a case of a teenager who approached a woman after following online flirting advice and he was prosecuted for harassment despite only doing it once.
    1
  10. They're unattractive men she does not want to share a society with.
    1
  11. If I beg in a public place, I'd be arrested and fined up to £1,000. If I beg on TikTok, I make £1,000's. Absolute joke.
    1
  12. And because the likes of Reddit refused to police their sites, now the state is getting involved with ID/age verification and digital ID. That'll be reality in the UK in one months time.
    1
  13. Only today the BBC published a story on virtual relationships with AI within a story about dating in China. When women have virtual boyfriends, it's seen as positive, empowering and better than the human counterpart. When men have virtual girlfriends, they're seen as sexists, losers and pathetic. Why the double standard?
    1
  14. Hard work is predominately genetic - about 60-70% of what makes someone hard working can be attributed to genetics if I recall a recent study. It's an uncomfortable truth for the blank slate, "you can achieve anything if you just grind, touch grass and gym bruh" crowd because they simply won't accept it. There's a reason why we have success, business ownership and dynasties run in families - in the same way, it's why you also see families stuck on welfare.
    1
  15.  @eudaemxnia2481  So I looked at the most popular podcasts on the Internet Radio I have. All but one in the top ten are the BBC. That exception happens to be a certain right wing commentator who keeps being cancelled. The last time I checked, the BBC is not alternative media. The next most popular is from LBC, another mainstream left wing broadcaster.
    1
  16. Being a Karen is predominantly learned behaviour and can be reversed. Being an incel is predominatly genetic and can't. Removing the latter from society will be akin to arresting people for skin colour or sexual orientation. In terms of young people being banned from the Internet, the UK ia going to mandate age/ID verification for all websites with anything not "safe for kids" by July 25th. Including all user generated content.
    1
  17. It should be fairly logical that if your dating app business model has the perverse incentive that requires people to remain single in order to remain profitable, then it should come as no surprise that people feel burned out by the apps. People finding love are classed as part of "churn" and are a bug, not a feature. Add into that the recent successful redefining of the concept of "hooking-up" as dating by the apps and turning the apps into the same model as mobile gaming. And that's before we get into the data around matches and dates.
    1
  18. Two things that destroy the usual narrative around AI girlfriends - the reality is that they're are not the exclusive realm of single male losers and dead bedroom relationships are more common than we would like to admit. As for him being bald, was he bald when they met? Even so, that's one data point and could easily be an exception. We know that baldness is a handicap when dating, not in established relationships.
    1
  19. A lot of just world fallacy in the chat.
    1
  20. So what did your apology achieve? Your critics and haters are still going to do those things. You cannot appease these people. Meanwhile you've cheesed off those who were not offended or angered. In an attempt to appease everyone, you've appeased no-one. Which is why I tell people, if you've done nothing wrong, do not apologise.
    1