Comments by "adamnesico" (@adamnesico) on "The Genetics of Prehistory." video.

If it would be just a social construct, forensic antropologists couldn’t determine race seeing the bones. Say ut clear, political cal integrism is censoring science again.
4
@lif3andthings763 then why dont bantus pay reparations to the huntergatherers?
4
@lif3andthings763 really? Then why forensic anthopologists can see the race in the bones?
2
@tannr A category that has efects in bones, average height, skin, facial structure, inmunity, behavior... isn’t arbitrary. What do you wanna say that breeds are social constructs? The diference between breeds are very tangible. And species is a social construct and you don’t deny it because it doesn’t affect the capitalist dogma of inmigrant supremacy.
2
@tannr Its not stupid, soviets said that the inheritance of characters was just a capitalist conspiracy. People likes to deny concepts that go against their political and economic structure. Chinese like the race c ncept because they are isolationists and nationalists, gringos hate it because goes against their inmigrant supremacy and delocalization of births.
2
@tannr And you are the ones who have the prejudice that all africans are black, I don’t have it.
2
@kensmith405 Aryans were from Europe, their linguistic and cultural descent is on India and Iran.
2
@lif3andthings763 What doesn’t fit? Dors anthropologists mistakes the identification? Neither fits perfectly the concept of specie and you don’t claim that is a social construct and want to abolish it. You just have a problem with it due to political dogmas linked to economic structure. Soviets too said that the inheritance of genes was a capitalist construct.
2
@kensmith405 aryans are no longer in Europe, they were a branch of the yamnaya.
2
@ponternal Environmental adaptation. A big dong freezes with a blizzard.
2
14:55 Another example of megaplayboy, if gene data didn’t changed, could be the kings of carthage, like one third of magrebis has EM72 haplogroup, the most recent ancestor seems from the iron age.
2
@belstar1128 In religion we are in fact very similar, is one of the main reasons that join us.
2
If it would be a social construct forensic antropologists couldn’t determine race with bones. Stop ur capitalist dogma.
1
@090giver090 that human races are very similar to each other doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
1
Sky father is far older, Tengri is the mongol version, chinese have too their own.
1
Liar, if that would be true forensic anthopologists couldn’t determine race by the bones.
1
What a stupid saying.
1
3:46 Science confirm the popular belief that sinids look all the same.
1
@lif3andthings763 Subspecie? Your religious phobia to pronounce the blasphemous term is so irrational that you just suggest euphemisms.
1
Migration? Doesn’t matter how you wanna call it, even refugees can conquer yhe people that received them. For me any migration that drastically changes the society and puts the natives as inferior is an invasion.
1
@kensmith405 Arrived to India, nazi fool.
1
Yeah, then why forensic antropologists can determine race by the bones. Stop ur capitalist dogma.
1
Debunked? Any hindu that says that just end giving proofs supporting it. Most they can do is to say it started as a peaceful migration and ended in the submission of the dravidians.
1
Then why forensic antropologists can know race by the bones?
1
@lif3andthings763 Facts are shit for you? Then you must hate reality.
1
There is no geofrafic diferemce between those.
1
Asians isn’t a race.
1
Race like? Say race guy, less phobia. Not just Toba, others point too to drastic african droughts be4 humans went out of Africa. Some says Toba eruption is overstimated.
1
Not false, that Q haplogroup probably came with the mogol wave of 7:10
1
@Miki-fl9ez modern mongols are C, xiongnu haplogroups were diferent, and other peoples contemporary of xiongnu were Q.
1
Sure? Between the most ancient races are the bushmen and pigmys, wich are soft brown.
1
Not, the etruscans came from Troy. Romans were culturally and racially close to celts and illirians.
1
Yes, for me is Eastern West.
1
@belstar1128 no, japan is very diferent from West. And see how USA has continually declared wars and financing uprising for its religions of liberty, masonry and free market?
1
@aidan883 japanese are xenophobic, nationalists, have buddhism and shinto as base religions, are prodly elitist and submissive to their leaders, if they have a democracy is because conquerors firced them, and it fact it isn’t a true democracy, votes are supposed to be used to punish the rulers if do it bad, and japanese always vote the sane party, they think vote other would be to treason the emperor. Japanese have a hive mind of sacrifice for the group, they frown individualism, and too frown feminism. They inmolate themselves for war or protest. Where are the similarities with west apart of economy and secularism?
1
k. yes, still i see arabs having more in common with West than with the Monsoon zone, so they arent East.
1
k. How are they more westernised apart of the economy?
1
k. About no importance of religion you are wrong. China, north Korea, Vietnam, are countries ruled by a religion: Marxism. Indonesia, Tailand, Myanmar, India... still see religion as an important part of life. You are generalising Taiwan, Singapur, Japan and south Korea, th most colonized and submitted to capitalism countries. The rest arent like those. More personal liberty? You call personal liberty to the insane amount of work and submission to the authorities in China, Korea, Japan...
1