Comments by "adamnesico" (@adamnesico) on "How Disgust Drives Society, History and the Right" video.

I totally disagree with that cypher, it blames the christians for nazism or communism or american genocide, while not blaming muslims for black death. Don’t trust islamists, they lack self criticism and has strong xenophobia. Or are you another christianophobe?
2
Do a better channel than him be4 say crap.
2
Aryan invasion theory has lot of proofs supporting it, you are just putting hindu supremacy agenda.
2
Because feminism= female supremacy, wich doesn’t happen in conservative societys.
2
Wrong. Muslims love sex slavery, harems and to buy chastrated kids. Those can be seen as degeneracy. And many of them in secret do homosexuality and pederasty.
2
@aryan3272 not The strongest, 42 times invaded. Neither most advanced the last 400. Be invaded from West is part of ur nature. Aryans were westerners. Dravidians are the true indians, northerners are a mix.
1
@aryan3272 migrations of violent people end becoming invasions. Migrations have both sexes, invasions just males. European mtDNA is far lesser in India than Y DNA. Looks a lot like LatinAmerica.
1
@aryan3272 if aryans would came from india, their european relatives would have in big amounts the H indian y haplogroup, and others. They don’t. Neither is found steppe dna in indus valley civ. Today such dna is present in all indians. Too the indian branch would be basal. It isn’t. Coming from sanscrit? Convince the linguists of that. According to them oldest indoeuropean language is lituan.
1
@aryan3272 doesn’t matter how they died, those people had no aryan genes, aryans were from outside. Archaeology has already showed that those cities were abandoned be4 the invasion. The fall of indus civ caused the aryan invasion, not the opposite as was thought. As mel gibson said, great civs aren’t defeated be4 they defeat themselves. To think that a group of violent warriors didn’t made any violence for become the most succesful group in the new land is denial. East of India most common y haplogroup is O, they don’t come from India.
1
@aryan3272 dravidians are a completely independent griup of language, non european, and indus civ remains are genically closer to dravidians than to modern inhabitants of the place. Dravidians are the true heirsof indus civ, indosryans are the mix of dravidians with aryans. Sanscrit being the first european language is remotely possible. Dravidian to be derived from sanscrit is impossible, too much mutations in too few time needed and for no reason. Liar, there is evident dna change and vedic luterature shows the war. Tell me, do you know remains of the yamnaya invasions in Europe? Of course not, but it happened. Or are you gonna deny it and say that extremely violent people behaved well for no reason? You lie yourself for your supremacist pride.
1
@aryan3272 You need to lie yourselves to be proud? Then you arent truly proud of your history. I understan, your country is poor and really dirty and that makes you racist who can’t bear you come from a big mix, like everyone else in world.
1
@aryan3272 i can agree with mist of that post. I don’t project, european culture currently dominates world, we know we are mixed.
1
@aryan3272 its happening. Good luck competing with China, Africa and USA.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 Indi nazionalists? German nazionalists said they were a fact and gernans were most aryans. Nazionalists cant be trusted, in West the theory keeps being sipported by archaeology and archaeogenetics.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 not fact, just delusions of people who think lie is better than acknowledge truth. German certainly lied. Although is true Germans are distant relatives if aryans, they aren’t aryans.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 iranians too called themselves aryan. Its not just hindu. Your people even say the stupid thing that dravidian languages and aryans are related, that is something only a liar would say, no linguist would say that. We know about linguistics genetics and archaeology, and all support the thoery. Of course you are too racist for acknowledge you aren’t a pure race.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 Indoarian languages are related to europeans and iranians, dravidians not. the remains of the burials in indus civ doesn’t have steppe genes. All indians today have. Too rigvedas speak of war with people similar to indians. Indoaryans have exogamous clan family, like in the steppe. Dravidians have their own cousin marriage system. Arkhaim sites resemble things said in the rig veda. Indus civ not.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 Ive given you a lot of proofs, that you are too dumb and fanaticd to underrstand or accept them is your problem. There is no proof of iranians following vedas or hinduism, and that certain words who design divine beings good and bad have reversed moral between iranians and hindus seems to suggest aryans separated between iranians and indoaryans due to a religious schism. Rigveda too says that the aryans conquered the 10000 cities of the dasa and defeated the lingam worshipers. How apears the river? Why not? The final version of the rigveda was undoubtly composed in India. There was no Sparta in the troyan war, but the Iliad mention Sparta because it existed in Homers time. Thats self-delusion, a migration performed by violent people always end becoming a invasion, and more when the invaders are far more men than women, as genetics show. Yes, 2 can form. But think as an explosion. The aryan expansion would have eaten the dravidians if they would have formed in India. Kurgan origin is more plausible, it occupies a central position in the yamnaya expansion and archaeology and genetics support the palce as the beginning. Sorry, but ur linguistic theory can be easily unproven. North India is a land of farmers, the true comercial zone is the dravidian, and they haven't changed their language due to their stronge commerce. Indus valley remains show more similarity to the dravidians, so, the dravidians are the original indians, the northern ones are the mixed with the europeans, as ther anguage and culture shows.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 1 Original name of Iran= Iranshar> Aryan kingdom. Yes, word isnt exactly aryan, but as it means too noble and pure and its similar, clearly point to a same origin. 2 I havent read rigveda, but in internet you can search those words I said. I know that. Misterious, still, its possible that an aryan traveler saw the sarawasti be4 the invasion. Indus civ had colonies over aryan lands. 3 Because those sites were abandoned due to the decadence of the indus civ, that same decadence produced the invasion, as the civ wasnt strong anymore for content the barbarians in the frontiers. Thats like say that find no remains of destruction by the spanish in the classic mayan cities proofs that there was no spanish invasion of mesoamerica. The sites described in the rigveda dont resemble indus civ cities, those were already empty. I dont know any archaeologic remain who proofs the celt invasions, but we know they happened because its impossible that such a warlike people traveled without invade. All yamnaya peoples were highly warlike. 4 Ye, there are sanskrit words due to be under same culture, but those languages are so diferent that linguists classify them as diferent. That now you use english words for new thigns doesnt mean now your langauge is english. Learn linguistics. I dont know exactly where they originated, but its evident that the dravidian is the indian native linguistic group, and looks obvius that the indus civ too spoke dravidian.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 Tell me, you know archaeologic evidence of all the historic invasions of India? And you gonna say me then than none of those happened? Assumptions? You are the one assuming that steppe people were peaceul and then suddenly became extremely aggressive for no reason. Dont blame others of do the same as u. You use migration because you refuse to accept your essence is mixed and comes from an european coquiest. As I said migration done by violent peoples= Invasion. Aryans existed at the same time as saravasti and we know indic civ had colonies over them, so why do you think aryans had never seen the saravasti be4 conquer India? They needed an invasion for conquer the people who existed there. You think only civiliced people resist invaders? Do you think when a civ colapses its inhabitatns disapear? You are the one making extremely fool assumptions. I dont know. As I told you, how many signs of the persian, macedonian, scythian, kushan, arab, turk, afgan, english.... Or of the roman, assyrian, spanish, celtic, hun... invasions you know? Are you gonna say me none of those were invasions? I simply assume aryans behaved like any other else did after them. You are assuming they behaved diferent for no reason.You must give a reason. Yes, I know that there is aryan dna in both but less in the south. Iranshar= Noble kingdom Aryavarta= Noble land. Pakistan= Pure land Arent the concepts of nobility and purity related? You dont see the relation because you dont want to. So if the religion is what really matters, wich problem do you have in accepting just another invasion more in your long history of invasions? Your religion is national, see how the aryan gods soon stopped being worshipped, in the end the indians assimilated religiously the aryans, as they did with all invaders, except with muslims and english.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 according to your reasoning, that no trace of spanish destruction on mayan classic cities proof that spanish never invaded mesoamerica. :p I already said you the indus civ cities had been left, the settlement described in rigveda doest fit with indus cities. The only historians who said that are hindu nazionalists. You are apporting 0 reasons of why they didn’t behaved as any invader after them. Are you gonna deny too all the historical invasions of the world due to lack of arcaeoligic proofs? Are you gonna say me you peacefully submitted to the english because there are no archaeological proofs of conquest? Why you have such inferiority complex? I see many hindus accepting the invasion.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 They got attacked? What do you mean? War is never in just one direction, there is always mutual violence. When a people arrive to a new place and conquer it, thats an invasion. Again, you aare the worst type of blind, the one who refuses to see. Who are the main gods in hinduism? Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva, the creator, the conservator and the destroyer, right? Wich is the main god in rigveda? Indra, the sky father. Wich is the equivalent of greek Zeus or turkic Tengri. Hes a steppe god. And you know the best one? Aryan>Diaus Pitar Rome>Deus Pater They bringed new gods, its proved. But in the end, the local gods prevailed.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 Liar, you beieve in the fake theory that aryans arrived as good boys who made no harm and then suddenly they made the kshatriya, both for no reason. A migration done by violent people is an invasion.
1
@sonofuniverse6355 German burden? Im not german. Aryan invasion is a way to describe what happened, a group of violent men imposing over a new land. And deny the aryan invasion is a thing of hindu supremacism who refuse to think tha their origin is in their defeat by invaders. As if they havent been defeated enough in history, one would think most should be used to. Inferiority complex? Why? My nation was one of the most powerful for 4 centuries, my language is more spoken than yours and than all dravidian languages. And Im not saying my people has never been invaded, I acknowledge it happened many times. Is you who refuse to acknowledge defeat due to your inferiority complex. Its not debunked. You havent provided any justification for your posture, jut keep repeating people behaved against their nature for no reason.
1