Comments by "adamnesico" (@adamnesico) on "Explaining South-East Asian Civilizations" video.

  1. Yes, like Cambodia, Burma, India, Afganistan, Mongolia, Japan...
    1
  2. iberoamerican civ, he already covered it.
    1
  3.  @krystalccameron7689  and thats totally compatible with what i said.
    1
  4.  @krystalccameron7689  search understanding latinamerica
    1
  5. Guys, download it be its taken down again.
    1
  6. Its fans care about it. You dont care about censorship?
    1
  7. CApitalism dictatorial? I hope you arnet comunist. Aniways, capitalism is turning more dictatotial due to the economic influecne of a comunist dictatorship. Good sample of the dictatorial nature of comunism.
    1
  8. They gave you railways, other modern tech, and certain amount of unification. Yes, they stole a lot for those things,
    1
  9.  @dynamitebsb4520  1 im not english 2 you know how partitioned was the indian subcontinent be4 the english? They left it more united than when they arrived.
    1
  10.  @dynamitebsb4520  no, to the africans i can say they were bringed civilisation. And the railways too. To the afroamericans, they exist thanks to that tragedy. If they think it should had never happened, then they should all return to Africa and stop blaming. If you hate so much the english, destroy everything they gave you, destroy those railways you say are only for english, and return to the XVIII century, dividing ur country too to the previous frontiers.
    1
  11.  @dynamitebsb4520  i dont try to protect it, i agree the english were greedy and evil. I just ask you to be fair and recognize you owe them what you are now. If you hate it so much, destroy it and return to the past. You se? You even say mughals. Stop using that english word and call them gurkhanis, their original name.
    1
  12.  @dynamitebsb4520  no, when the english conqered the continet ariund plassey battle, gurkhanis were rotting after the wars with the marathis and iranians. English just took advantage of their receding power. Marsthis, sikhs, and many other kingdoms had declared independence. That was your situation be4 the english.
    1
  13.  @dynamitebsb4520  fool, im not english, and if they were able to conquer india from such a long distance was because they were already relevant. Always my balls, delhi was the center of india only while the turk supremacy. Be4 Delhi was kannauj. That supremacy was ended, thats why the english were able to triumph. You can’t return to sonething wich was aniways almost dead. Then why you do not destroy everything the english gave you, including your political administration, and return to a more divided india, as it has been for most of its history?
    1
  14.  @dynamitebsb4520  no, im spanish, english are too our enemies. But at least you should acknowledge the good things they gave you along with the bad ones. You can’t suddenly return to that. When you are in the top wealth, its likely the one you commerce most will quit you your wealth. You did it to the romans, then the english did it to you. You want it back? Then quit it to the Americans or chinese commercing with them. Neither you can go back to the tines the hindus were the slaves of the turks. Hindus have awoken.
    1
  15. ​ @dynamitebsb4520  Modern democracy? Yes. By USa, wich are other kind of english. Your modern administration comes from the english. You left out Sri Lanka, nepal and bhutan. Why those dont count for you? Ah of course, because 2 of those werent cpnquered by the english and he other is an island. Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka are as indian states as those other 3. You see how even your modern national conception comes from the english? You can be far more divided, India is now quite united compard with its historical average. When english conquered you you were more divided. A world map shows 18 tates in 1750 and 15 states in hindostan in 1780 And you spoke fo Sha jahan? In that time of "union" the map shows 13 states in 1600 and 14 in 1666. You were never more united than under the english. Well, maybe under the mauryas. Secularism and socialism are western ideas, India its completely religious in its core. You must too renounce those to return to the past. You are a liar, turks conquered you in a genocidal bloodbath that destroyed hindu culture. There wasnt true prosperity until the gurkanis, 500 years after the beginning of the massacres. You should have given the english another 250 years for be able to say they were worse than the turks. You are probaly jut a muslim who miss the days of turk supremacy when you used the hindus as ur doormat.
    1
  16.  @dynamitebsb4520  there was no diference of brutality between the turks and spanish, as the long story of massacres, slavery and scheming they had proof. The diference was in the weakness of the conquered. I guess u can agree bantu or malays were far less brutal than turks, and still they exterminated their natives. And fir certain, spanish didn’t exterminated the malays, because they already knew the diseases, the main reason of depopulation. Thats why Filipines is more populated than almost any spanish colony. So, that genocide would had happened too if turks would had invaded them. Do i remember you the 80 millions of deads by black death the turks brought? And peopke cant agree in how many they killed in inia, undoubtedly dozens of millions. Thanks fir show you have the prejudices that the english have inculcated you. You can’t reject them while totally embracing their inheritance. If you are so eager to become again the turks doormat, deckare yourselves colony of 🇹🇷 .
    1
  17. People f the culture describe liked the video. Cultures are precisely geenralizations about human masses.
    1
  18.  @jayzee4097  wich fails have the book?
    1