Comments by "adamnesico" (@adamnesico) on "How Envy Drives Society, History and the Left." video.

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 1
  7.  @randomloserdontthinkaboutit  Yes just one doesnt define, but is a representative sample. You didnt see how people are in China, India, Africa, the Ummah... Basically all lands not conquered by USA hates the wokes, and they are most of mankind. That you are an iman for woke inmigrants doesnt mean that in their countries all think like them. So dont be so entitled, most people dont support you. Really? Because they hate anyone who refuses to integrate in what they think is their PC set of enabled things. Youre rich? We hate u. You are no POC? We hate you. You are a hetero male? We hate you. You are no socialist? We hate you. And you dont see the bad things of preach equality? First, 4 scify distopias aboout equality: -The things to come: English destroy all world langauges, and all religions, except socialism, in the name of equality. -We: The individuality of people is smashed to make them just homogenised tools for the state. -Ringworld: Equality laws have made Earth completely homogeneous. No races, no languages, no architectures, no countries, no cultures, all the same. Such a lame boring world. In fact it says that if spacefaring is so prominent is because many people see it as the only way to scape suicide by boredom. -The forever war: The premise even more extreme. Modern mankind is now an individual clone with a hive mind. Equality carried to the ultimate extreme. So, you cant defend both diversity and equaity, they are opposites. As ecologist I defend diversity. Too, it makes people to lie and reject the diferences that exist in reality and drives to unfair things, like males turned "women" expelling real women from sports, or to promote mediocrity, like how army is becoming more mediocre for integrate women. Or to lie rewriting history to their own like. Or use it to justify genocides or culture destruction, like evryone must be equal inside the state, so no other ethnic or culture will be allowed. Or to justify injustice in the main of equaity, like proclaiming that priviliged sectors deserve to be treated with unfair laws. Well, that is certainly the tolerance paradox. As soon as you dont tolerate something you are untolerant. As Spegler said tolerance is a virtue of slaves. Anorexic no shamed for something beyond their control, they are still beautiful? Why dont you say the same about nambla?
    1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1