Comments by "adamnesico" (@adamnesico) on "The Future of Ideology." video.

  1. No, thats just a femibolshevik fantasy. I see more pausible Europe turm like The Caliphate of Tom Kratman. Euro girls are already being enslaved, see the series The infamy.
    3
  2. In the future? What do you think they did in 1944?
    3
  3. Socialism is too a religion. Of course they deny it for evade the separation church-state.
    3
  4. Yes, and Islam is a very dangerous jok, just see th purdah and its consequence like the burka or the eunuch commerce.
    3
  5. @Al aqsa If that would be true, Turkey, Pakistan, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia... would be already banned and invaded.
    2
  6.  @ikengaspirit3063  All civs start as barbarians.
    2
  7.  @خلال-م8د  Because your medi alway represent you as he good guys and the heroes. But outside, we can really see your imperialism. We say, USA see themselves as he cop of the world. And I would say as the corrupt cop who killed Floyd, always destroying countries when they want. I must do a meme where Iraq is George Floyd and USA the cop. Protect us from Russia? We would be better with good commerce realtions with Russia and Iran than supporting the egoist interest of USA for block them. Russia doesnt have money for perform an occupation
    2
  8.  @darkfire916  You say he exagerates? What he says is clearly the image that left is giving to the right. I see more hate to whites in leftist media than hate to jews in nazi movies. If you believe is uncorrect, then your media is doing a horrible work representing you. Gender is a social construct? If that were true, women and men wouldnt act around world basically the same.
    2
  9.  @howardli7129  Well ,antionalism still has certain popular support, but certainly the rulers are agains it, and people mostly votes what rulers order them to. See the last french elections, nationalism was gonna win, and rulers simply created fast a new candidate and asked eveyone to vote him.
    2
  10. Why do you always call them mughals an not gurkhanis? Ah of course, english still rule you and they are grumpy that they didnt conquered the gurkhas.
    2
  11.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  Not only that, genetics show the dominance of the R1a haplogroup in both russian steppes and north India.
    2
  12.  @alirezabhmanabadi4235  Mutazilism is proscience. Not Islam in general. Unitarism has been the dominanat tread in Islam the last millenia, it rejects science. Muhammad valued scientists? I dont see that. Islamic scientist didnt started to pop until 2 centuries after Muhammad.
    1
  13.  @alirezabhmanabadi4235  What is lie? He has reason. Yes, alGazali was a good scientist. But he buried science for Islam. He said that falasifa cant proof the existance of Allah, then is lesser to kalam. Too that everything is done by Allah, nothing happens by itself, Allah can cahnge what happens as he wants, so its useless to try to find laws of nature, if they exist, they can just change anytime at ITS will. Maybe for reconcile the fact that world isnt as Quran says? After alGazalis works, science fell until disapear in the Ummah.
    1
  14.  @alirezabhmanabadi4235  Sorry, Ive never read it, it isnt translated where I live. Im just repeating you what Ive read fom others. Still, people see both alGazali and Nizam al Mulk as the enders of muslim falasifa and science. Nizam created modern integrist education. alGazali with that observation of falasifa cant find Allah destroyed science prestige for the muslims I guess. Certainly the part of world can change at any point was said by a christian youtuber. Has nice videos, but its too ambitious in his efort of understan mankind and often makes mistakes portraying other cultures. If you have read, illuminate us. I had the honor of read the Muqqadimah and ibn Battutas Rihla. They are geat works.
    1
  15.  @alirezabhmanabadi4235  Neither you have read it but you are speaking about it. At least is true that you do it from people that have read it. I know that Ibn Ruschd made a book for refute the arguments of alGazali. I read that that book was mostly rejected in the Ummah that prefered the arguments of alGazali, but was welcomed in Europe, so, while Ummah forgot falasifa, Europe welcomed it and its rise in science started. Its true that lots of arguments f aGazali against philosophic theories of his day were true, but in the end now we see how useful is the scientific method.
    1
  16.  @alirezabhmanabadi4235  For certain, according to you, what ended the muslim golden age of science and culture?
    1
  17.  @alecnorton5490  Islams influence will grow with their population, Euro rulers wanna repace breeding with islamic inmigration. What are you saying? Euronationalists hate Russia. Europeans vote what their lords order them, I dont see nationalism winning.
    1
  18.  @MuhammadRaiyan135  And still al Ghazli doctrine has dominated Islam for most of its existence. So I dont see Islam as supporting science, above all when science is built in doubt and criticism, things banned in Islam.
    1
  19. Really? Most exmuslims say how desolate and alone feel ater their selffostracism.
    1
  20.  artez 1  Hes making very ambitious videos about terribly complex matters, its natural if he often is mistaken. Do a better work than him, I bet you cant.
    1
  21. What are you saying? Swed martial? They cant even control their inmigrants, their cops are resigning. French yes, they are the colonial power of Europe. Europe armies are highly disfunctional, I totally see them conqured by more adept enemies.
    1
  22.  @opinion4755  You know what is a total disaster in Europe? The birthrates. Europe is behind too in weapons, prestigious universities, innovation, self steem. I totally see Europe being islamised.
    1
  23.  @opinion4755  you dont dee the islamic influenxe? Brits dont stop making movies about relations with muslims, while in the Tolkien movie they censored his christianisms. I say UK is now an de facto islamic country.
    1
  24. I dont see future for Visegrad group, together they are less than France, Italy or UK, it can be easily economically blocked, so it depends of good realtions with his neighbours, both hate their ideology. I dont see hope for them.
    1
  25. Wich things is he mistaken?
    1
  26. China now dress like westerners, have a westerner state religion, pruposefully tried to destroy its culture for replace is with west, copied the low birthrate... I see China more westernized than India.
    1
  27. If you cant see their culture, you are blind.
    1
  28. The ambition of this channel does it impressive, not pathetic. Can you do better than him? Do it.
    1
  29. @Al aqsa Wrong.
    1
  30. Another religious guy showing his xenophoby. Wars have lots of explanations, religions usually dont creates wars, just the sides, and often not even that.
    1
  31. And they have no support from the system.
    1
  32. I see one continent with many countries.
    1
  33. Dont wory, we already are giving our lives for it. USE will be done like USA, replacing the natives.
    1
  34. Of course is more european, Canada is still a british subject.
    1
  35. You will be, as turks ;)
    1
  36.  @jindrichdolejs623  For me he nailed it. Europeans now preach self hate.
    1
  37. @The505Guys That never condoned killing? XDXD See sengoku japan. Cut heads was everyones wet dream.
    1
  38. @The505Guys Are you kidding? There is no comparison, cut heads wasnt more common betwen christians than any other people, but japanese were passionate head hunters, for them it was the easisest way of social promote in sengoku time, so it was the national dream.
    1
  39. I think myself quite cultured, but with no formal title. What are you gonna do? Ive enver seen a prophet asking for help for spread his message.
    1
  40.  @demigodtherapper483  Uf, give you a insuffiient answer to all the things that comes to my mind wold be so long, im quite busy now. Can I answer u by parts? Im no wise person, Im a complete fool, but something I have is enciclopedic knowledge, if that serve you of something...
    1
  41. India has been continously invaded trough history from Afganistan. You are denying it happened too in the prehistory?
    1
  42.  @Moo0Na  Wrong, you are forgetting the persian, alexandrian, grecobatrian, saka, kusahana, heftalit, arab... Invasions. Its an historic constant. Refugees? The rigvedas dont speak of be refugees, it speak of invasion and genocide. Refugees dont become the majority of the male Y haplogroups.
    1
  43.  @Moo0Na  we conqered the 10000 cities of the dasyus. We killed the impure dasyus. If thats not invasion...
    1
  44. You are the only westerner that see the great potentail of Islam? All right wingers see it, thats why they are so afraid.
    1
  45.  @ikengaspirit3063  By magic, you mean civil wars and invade Europe?
    1
  46. Will be solid until the bubble crashes. Then we will to who is more similar, Japan or URSS.
    1
  47.  @largeegothegreat3645  Really? And who is leftist in USA? California is the leftist state, and is too the most unequal, middle calss is fleeing from it. Yes, in California richs pays good taxes. And that means the income is quite unstable, rich income is more unstable than the one of the middle class.
    1
  48. I disagree. There is lot of acceptance to those, and most of them are fairskinned.
    1
  49. Iberoamerica politicians just imitate whatamericna ones do. Nothing new is going there.
    1
  50.  @NeepsHD212  If you think there is something diferent or important there, say it. I only see a bad imitation of USA.
    1
  51.  @NeepsHD212  I have many ways of educate myself, dont think everyone is in ur same perspective and say me what im not seeing.
    1
  52.  @NeepsHD212  what ive done for be confused with the ilustrious whatifalthist.
    1
  53.  @NeepsHD212  so many? Not im just an obsessive compulsive guy with no friends How can you count the number of comments?
    1
  54. The ones who say that are often marxist beleivers. Hypocrites desiring to impose thei religion. No, cancer kills. if it would b cancer, societys would swiftly die after have a religion. They dont. I see more like societys die after urbanize, become rich, peaceful, and atheist. Mayb those things are the true cancer.
    1
  55.  @millgiass  That view can be easily prooved false. According to your theory, a deeply religious scoiety should disapear after not much time. See the arabs, 1400 years being really religious. Or the jews, 3000 years. So, no, religion doesnt kill societys. Lets see the opposite, wich societys had science and big cities in the past. Sumerians: Gone. Abasids: Gone Ptolemaics: Gone Tenochtitlan: Gone Science too has created the nuclear weapons that could wipe us. I see more proof of big cities and science are cancer. See the exeriments with mice. High population density reduces fecundity, there is a strong correlation between urbanisation and fall of fecundity. Too exists a strong correlation between atheism and low fecundity. I guess women need to think in a superior cause for breed, atheists tend to think the best cause is $, and kids are an obstacle for make $ Too see history. Romans be4 their decadence lost their faith in their gods and values. India be be invaded by muslims lost faith in buddhism. Now Europe los faith in christainism and is being "invaded" by other cultures. I see too a correlation there. You are just a Marx worshiper showing the hate to other faiths that your religion has. Your religion has just replaced god with the state, and has the same amounts of stupid dogmas and hate. Most religions arent as untolerant as the ones founded by bearded semytes. You are the same type of person you are denouncing. You know the Bylve parable of the mote in the eye? See yourself. Stop projecting in others your own hate. And seeing ur videos, just a small teen that beleives he knows far more than he actually knows.
    1
  56.  @millgiass  I dont obey noone that commands me to stop talking here, and less a Peter Pan. Not all are. The abasids, al-Andalus, the papacy... were theocracies with good life quality. But certainly, most are shithole, just see the cuban, korean, venezuelan, east berlin... marxist theocracies. Typical marxist deforming the language to make it fit to his deformed vision of the world. Death is cease of existance, those shithole are still life. Religion its far more, is too common purpose, virtue, ethics, organization... I you are unable to see it, you are blinded by your religious fanaticism. Of course its a religion, I could write you lots of things in wich is equal to abrahamic religions. You of course denie it for avoid the separation of state and religion. You are wrong, your hate to (others) religion is a dogma you believe. Your videos list of games and anime is typical of a teenager. See Dragon Ball, the shonen by excellence. You adult? Well, a good example of how consumism infatilizes people.
    1
  57. Dialectal realism you call to the pile of religious dogma they spit? He has reason, leftist are alienating all the hetero guys, they show more hate to them than nazi movies ever showed to jews.
    1
  58.  @elaikehler6030  if you dont see the huge amount of hate to hetero guys of left media, you are blind. Im european, i agree with public health.
    1
  59.  @elaikehler6030  Are you blind? SJW, yhe stablishnent. Firsts are the puppets of the seconds, why you believe that stablishment give them so much voice, for lose their power? Dont be naive and see the strings behind you.
    1
  60.  @leepdroon  wich far better ways?
    1
  61.  @leepdroon  I partially disagree with 1. It comes with merit, just with no ethic merit. $, beauty, simpathy and social position too are merits. I dont see women uncomprehensible, their motivations for me seem quite comprehensible. The problem is that everyone says that they use unbelievably complex ways for test men, and I simply cant pass those tests. Too that they have minimum rrequirements that I cant fulfill. Sorry, but according to my experience, socialization is -With men: To participate together in a bunch of boring activities. -With women: A check of achievements, for me thats not enjoyable, I always feel ashamed of have no achievements. Im 33, I fear im too old for make friends. Well, probably should try charity activities. I tried to do, but pandemy started. Maybe should try now? Or when it passes? What if never pass?
    1
  62. Well, that supports what he says. Once China bubble bursts, people will rebel.
    1
  63. Thats why world is afraid of Islam, by their xenophobia.
    1
  64. What do you see wrong in it?
    1
  65. 1 When did the cholas and vijayanagar united it? 2 Aryans werent hindus, see the Arkhaim site in Russia. 3 Irrelevant? Still has many kinds of conrol over its colonies. Tell me wich language do you learn in high school?
    1
  66.  @thavashgovender4345  1 half of the country is not unify the country. 2 Lets see what Im understanding. Yu are saying me that India existed be4 the aryan invasion? Of course existed. 3) The trains, the tanks, the planes, this modern artifact you are using for communicate, many social changes like see bad widow burning, see better the dalits, weaken the chase system, the elections, the indian govern... Hate clearly blinds you.
    1
  67. Islam was all those things at first, but with time evolved to a modern society. Yes, and when oil depeltes, theyll end in civil war, and will conquer Europe as refugees.
    1
  68.  @wartrix6046  Modern feminism clearly despises reproduction.
    1
  69.  @wartrix6046  Certainly the responsibles are the capitalists that rule them. But not sone hundreds. Dozens of millions of femiSS despise reproduction, for them inly produce money for capitalists is a noble life purpose.
    1
  70.  @wartrix6046  Capitalism is destruing it. Feminists are just their puppets.
    1
  71.  @wartrix6046  It isnt, old communists didnt supported feminist supremacy, thats capitalist stuff.
    1
  72. ​ @wartrix6046  You cant deny that the capitalists of America are the ones promoting the femiSS.
    1
  73. Protecting? You dominate us in colonial style. We would prefer to be commercing free with Russia and Iran.
    1
  74. Your idea of Islam is your own fairytale. You are like a communist.
    1
  75.  @bevbevan6189  Not so zero, would have mobilised the submarine could have enabled naval superiority.
    1
  76. An invasion for me seems a very normal migration. Do you ant any proof? Just India history: Continous invasions from Afganistan. More like: Wich proof have you that aryan invasion was peaceful and not violent as all the ones we know though history?
    1
  77.  Chandan Matho  That article in fact supports the invasion theory. I guess the politicians forced them to put something that the data that mentions dont support. Are you unable of see the fail in the article? The ony thing proven is how ashamed are the indians, that they lie about the interpretation of the discovery.
    1
  78.  Chandan Matho  Its yge clear conclusion of the work of the linguists. See an example, god father: Latin; Deus Pater Sanscrit: Diaus Pitar. Genetics too show thar russian plains and north india share same main Y DNA. That they got propagandistic advantage of that doesnt mean its wrong.
    1
  79.  Chandan Matho  linguists dont support sanscrit as basal language. Lituanian seems the more near to the basal. You didnt explained neither the DNA.
    1
  80.  Chandan Matho  And there’s no proof of ancient indian emigration, in 5500 years or recorded history the only time indians left india for their own volunty were the cholas. Ehy would indians want to leave their land by the hellish afgan monts?
    1
  81.  Chandan Matho  Where is the problem? Is a pre-invasion site, like the one of the link.
    1
  82.  Chandan Matho  Why not? Because there are no remains neither archeologic nor genetic or linguistic of that happening. Because indians in history has always hated to go outside India and I dont see why then would be diferent. British theory? I have the impresion that in fact its a german one. The hypotethical place of origin of the europan speakers is called Urheimat. Your theory is obviously indian, only indians beleive it. Wich questions I didnt answered? And where says that there is no R1a DNA in Sinauli? The wikipedia article doesnt mention DNA, an the people doesnt agre if its harappan or aryan. I guess is probably both, from a time of mix and transition.
    1
  83.  Chandan Matho  Indians hate to travel is talked by everyone, even by indians. Only with british domination they started to go over world. Well, except the cholas and gypsies. Not. Aryans werent neither european or indian, were asian steppe nomads that invaded India, as has happened so many times through history. Maybe they started the trend. So, according to you, you cant accept science or technology, because comes from foreigners. Then what are you doing using this foreign invention for comunicate? Euro supremacyst of course beleived that egyptian theory, but has no proofs in favour and is rejected. Recorded history is often false, genetics, archeology, linguistics can give more reliable data. Aryan theory comes from them, no history remembers it. Vikramarditya is as historical as Arthur and no foreign chronicle mentions him.
    1
  84.  @dhireshyadav1783  and you have no cultute, the article cites s sitt dated be4 the invasion, so of course doesnt have aryan dna. Proofs: The harappan eritings are in a language come letely diferent to sanscrit. India has the same main haplog
    1
  85.  @dhireshyadav1783  group than russian plains, and it diesnt happen in harappan remains. -Harappan carts are diferent to war chariots, those cane with aryans. - I already mentioned the similarity of sanscrit to european languages, thats the thing that originared the theory.
    1
  86.  @dhireshyadav1783  search the bibliography in wikipedia articles, im not a database. Ah fir certain, you believe that the persian, saka, and parthians are an invention? Those invaders were aryan too.
    1
  87.  @dhireshyadav1783  Im making a Biology work, I have no time for lose serching biography for a neonazi too ashamed of have foreign ascendancy. About the genetic haplogroups and their asiation wity populations and history my favourite site is eupedia. Search cocretely R1a. And too J2, the one of the first civiliced people. That oneprobably comes from Anatoly.
    1
  88.  @dhireshyadav1783  You didnt even knew that the article showed wasnt a proof against the theory. Even if i eould give you data, you wouldnt undertand it. Im busy with a science work, make ur own investigation, both wikipedia and eupedia cite a lot of sources.
    1
  89. PD the one who refuses a theory because it gors against his racist prejudices against foreigners is you. I have no problem in accept that most of my dna come from mid east and the russian plains.
    1
  90.  @dhireshyadav1783  There is many evidence. Sau yhat am article about lack of aryan evidence 4500 years ago is evidence of yhe invasion didnt exist, is like say that the lack of dinosaurs in a permian excavation shows that dinosaurs dont exist. You csnt even understand that simple logic.
    1
  91.  @dhireshyadav1783  tell me then why the hindus share with the russians the main Y dna, the aryan word and religious similarities with iranians, the finding of russian ruins that resemble the rigveda, and why the linguistic similarity with europeans. The linguistic similarity created the theory, archaeology and dna are supporting it. Explain all that. And there exist historic aryan invasions. The persians, saka and parthians were aryan.
    1
  92.  Chandan Matho  Vikrmaditya possibly existed. His conquests out of India are myth. No people outside India mentions it. mmmm wait, where were those conquests? Almost never, cholas and gypsies did, but you said a myth just for troling. You keep repeating the same lie, I still didnt see any argument that demostrate is wrong, I ve given arguments that support it. Are you gonna keep reepating like a parrot the same argumetns done by people with obvious inferiority complex?
    1
  93.  @dhireshyadav1783  i have too much papers to search for lose my time for you, ive already said you sites with bibliography, im not gonna lose my time doing what a lazy dont wanna do himself.
    1
  94.  @dhireshyadav1783  this isnt a tesis, i have one to do. Dont you have something more valyable that getting a small dopamina input losing time here?and uou clearly wanna make me lose time, you dont want to learn. The eupedia site is a wonderful window to prehistory.
    1
  95.  Chandan Matho  Are you unable of reason? The link that you gave saying prooving it didnt happened, in fact proof that it did happen. There was no steppe dna in that site, so, if now India has it, its because it comes from out of India. Harappa was no genically similar to Russia, so no, simialry isnt because you invaded it, is the opposite. Thanks for give the proof ;). And thanks for show you are unable of identify the proof. Dont be a detective, you would be a terrible one. And thanks for the Sayar thing. Im not afraid of learn new things. Any link to that painting?
    1
  96.  Chandan Matho  Ive already given you a proof about that the theory is german and not british. You dont even know how to intepret proofs, Dhiresh at least seem to know, so I wont write much 4 u. Search: sintashta andronovo arkhaim <this is evidence of aryans in russia. daeva in iranian. that seems to mean a religious split R1a eupedia
    1
  97.  Chandan Matho  Has ever been any group in India that arrived though the Khyber pass and massivley settled without a lot of bloodshed? Afganistan makes people crazy violent maniacs. All the historic invasions were violent. Were is your proof that time wasnt?
    1
  98.  Chandan Matho  According to your logic, if there are whites in USA that means there are no whites in Europe anymore, I cant believe u are so fool, you are just troling, so i dont want to answer u anymore.
    1
  99. Maybe, problem is, they beleive they will convert the muslim inmigrants. Right dont beleive that will be done. And history shows right has reason. So I see the ultimate direction of leftists will end be islamisation.
    1
  100. Of course Europe is pathetic, they are claiming their own conservatives are evil while pursuing to be replaced by worse foreign conservatives. They are the only culture that is pursuing self annihilation. Not even Russia scapes from the muslim takeoever.
    1
  101. How?
    1