Comments by "adamnesico" (@adamnesico) on "Dan Davis History"
channel.
-
9
-
8
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@petrapetrakoliou8979 Cavilla Sforza analysis shpws how much correlation exists between languages and genes.
Less people is speaking french nowadays in francafrique, the most modern movies of that place ive seen were in a native language.
How? Romans did not had public sholls, but they imposed their tongue in half of their lands.
I guess its simply colonial dominance: People imitates the colonizers.
Europe is full of basque toponims, and Euskadi has many topnims identical to others in Caucasus.
And guess what? Mot common Y haplogroup in Georgia, the bigget Caucasus speaker country, is G2a, guess wich was the dominant group in neolithic Europe?
Yeah, G2a.
So for me those are enough proofs that neolitic europe was mostly basque speaker.
Aniways, wich language they spoke didnt mattered. Roman and many other examples show i was possible.
Or see in BRazil. Tupi languag was conserved thanks to jesuit schools, once they were closed, the portugese imposed their language be4 even have public schools.
And no, genetics totally show that modern Europeans are nearly half neolitic basque, half yamnaya.
The yamnaya were able of impose their language over the natives.
And you are thinkinglike they amted only with conqured women.
You can think that the too imported some of their women, wich would force the conquered women to speak their language.
1
-
@petrapetrakoliou8979 All those nomads examples you mentioned conquered writing peoples, I see normal their languages didnt replaced the written tradition.
Or see the aryans.
They werent a bureaucratic state, but they imposed their language in most of India.
Or see the magyars, they too imposed their language over the people they conquered.
There are many real exceptions to ur theory.
For any reason .the yamnaya peoples loved to impose their language.
Have you seen the whatifalthist video about family?
Maybe the patriarcal clanic organisation of the yamnaya was effecive in impose language.
No, french in Africa is what english is for you and me, a language we were taught in school as secondary language for comunicate with foreigners, not as basic language, I personally never speak it in my personal life.
If french would be so needed, Mali wouldnt make its modern movies in bambara, that is their national lingua franca, they dont need the french, if they still speak french is due to colonialism.
Yo are wrong, search The basque-georgian connection.
Remember, historically has been 2 Iberias, one in Caucsus, other in the West. and that is justthe beginning, as I said, there are many identical toponims in both Caucasus and EuskalHerria.
English elite stopped speaking french due to the 100 years war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1