Comments by "adamnesico" (@adamnesico) on "Good Times Bad Times" channel.

  1.  @idy1172  Dont start with victimism, anyone that kno s their history knows they need no west for make wars. That most of the countries with more young people and more civil wars are muslim is no councidence.
    14
  2.  @sentientflower7891  Yes. Do you believe north Africa was arab, or that Islam arrived peacefully to Iran ir India? You never blame them their colonialism, hypocrytes.
    8
  3.  @sentientflower7891  Araby too earmed it and doesn’t have. And you don’t blame them, hypocryte.
    7
  4.  @lif3andthings763  India was already very poor be4 colonialism, most of the peasants still are slaves today. English worsened the situation, certainly.
    7
  5. We don’t wanna become another Nigeria. Why don’t go to other african countries with less population density?
    3
  6. It’s already happening, no need to invade when their education and media is under control.
    3
  7. Don’t be a nazi.
    3
  8. His ideas arent russification, dont be fooled by the fact he speaks well of the enemy people, he isnt blinded by hate.
    2
  9. His 5th project is very diferent to Russia, he says he wants freedom, not the present russian neofeudalism.
    2
  10. Russia recovered from the mongol and nazi invasions, they are really tough.
    2
  11.  Indic Religions  True,and they had a lot of inequality. That wealth was above all for the rich.
    2
  12.  @learningtime8544  Europe has snt responsible of the wars between yoruba and fulani, or burmese and karen. Stop signaling people as Satan, not every country in the world is a french colony.
    2
  13.  @lhomha8245  From themselves? Basically what gringos did.
    2
  14. Why should? As a map shows, development is more related to moderate temperatures than to resources. Africa is too hot, that quits people the desire to work.
    1
  15. NO Im conservative and Im not christian. Im racist, but I support the rights of minorities, too think a moderate amount of inmigrants is a good thing. Peoples ay of think are far more eclectic than what ur limited vision of world wanna admit.
    1
  16. Your hate is dangerous. No good russians? Then neither good ukranians, you are Russia's Minime.
    1
  17. And? You wouldnt desire to be part of an empire wich respects ur autonomy and culture? No? Thn why are u desiring to bow to USA?
    1
  18. His ideas are really good. Other thing is tha u are too much in love with an ukranian ethnostate with no palce in it for russians.
    1
  19. His olitics arent bolshviks. One can admire Israel. Whoever hates Israel, should hate too the first caliphate, Israel gve the arabs the same choice arabs gave to jews: Dimma or ruin. They just returned the medicine to the arabs.
    1
  20. Well, compared with the post soviet anrachy he wasnt a bad leader.
    1
  21. Sadly many ukranians in the comments hate him for not hate the russians.
    1
  22. Russia will never enable Ukraine to be part of NATO the same way USA blocked Cuba after the missile crisis. Noboday wanna have nulear missiles pointing them from their backyard.
    1
  23. Why? His ideas are so utopian and against interests, i dont think people will follow, them, at least now.
    1
  24. Soviet ukrain? His ideas doesnt soun soviet.
    1
  25. Do you know who is a real clown? Your leader. So, that doesnt discualifies him, even clowns can lead. Wrong, many of his viewers are men too.
    1
  26. To be honet. She is asperger. And as asperger I say you: We are deviants.
    1
  27. Really? You wana be part of a union that dissolves the nations identity and an empire whic thrrives in divide its subjects in 2 sides who hate each other? You wanna be part of an empire wich hates you for be a man? If you are unkranian nationalsits, you wont like to be aprt of UE, in my country, they now say european culture instead of my nation.The only ideology of my vicepresient is to hate men. you want to have a vicepresident who retires the banner of ur country in the meetings? Joining UE Ukrain would be just another european province with fading identity and islamisation. Many people agree wesern civilization is now as the roman republic last days. Now will come devastating ivil wars, an american emperor will arise, and a new century of prosperity will arrive, but after that, terrible decandence. This guy wanna create something new, thats really ambitious and interesting.
    1
  28. @Mark Loginov  no, I dislike absolute monarchs. I prefer small parlamentary countries. Really, that is the only option that comes to ur mind? Asterovich seems already busy in the war. So, u wannabe just another puppet of USA? At least Aristovich proposes something for be independent. Although certainly seems unlikely.
    1
  29. @Mark Loginov  those countries you said are monarchies, in fact quite like the roman empire, a powerful monarch and a weak parlament.
    1
  30. A populists would say peope what they wanna hear. A populist would pamper the xenophoby. He looks very fair remembering people russians are still brother and deserving respect.
    1
  31. He doesnt want the strong central government and the strong antidiversity politics of the french.
    1
  32. ANd I doubt he wants to imitate french colonialism.
    1
  33. As a foreigner, I would love to be part of the society he proposes. For ukrain nationalsits, what I have to say is: I prefer to enable the Rus to conquer u, we arent gonna risk for a nation we will never visit.
    1
  34. Only because he respects russians and reject ukranian nationalism its antural, as russian, he feels discriminated by it), i dont see why that makes hm ukrainfobic, if he were, he would be with putin.
    1
  35. If russian collapses, with the current demographic trends, i will be replaced by a bunch or turkic republics. They cant have future if they have no kids. Ey, great point of the farming.
    1
  36. Then u will have to end ukrain. Ukrain and Russia share too much for being brothers. He has reason, u are consumed by hate.
    1
  37. You would had enable the dixies to become an independent strong ally of Britain? I guess not. You didnt even enabled Cuba to be a russian ally. Russia wont enable it either.
    1
  38. No, greatest threat humanity ever faed are nuclear weapons. Mankind could survive even a permian heating, we are very adaptable. Maybe he rejects ecologism because crtain ecologists claim to stop having kids, and that is one of biggest problems for Ukrains future.
    1
  39. So, once the amchines can supply the emands better than us, they will replace us, rigth?
    1
  40. It too sounds strange to me. MAybe what he means is that ecologism is tied to globalism ,and globalists desires to end al lcountries, wich would end too all cultures. I undertand he dislikes a idea wich wanna destroy its culture.
    1
  41. Put Ukraine in E would mean it to lose its independence. I understand he refuses the idea.
    1
  42. His ideas sound interesting. No knowledge? He has showed many things I didnt knew he has knowledge. Sad to see u are being devoured by hate.
    1
  43. @Yura Pawluk  then you will have to break ur country in half. If I don’t remember bad half of ukranian population is russian.
    1
  44.  @yuriyco_  if they speak russian, they are russian, ukrain isn’t an ethnostate, ukrainian is a citizenship, not an ethnic. Isn’t sad a country who rejects its diversity? What do you wanna be, french? Then start replacing ur people with muslims and africans.
    1
  45. From the colonists not, the americans were colonists. From the motheland. And thats a frightening comparison: Quoting Heileins novel about moon revolution: -Revolutions usually lose. -Americans won theirs. -Because England was in war with many nations. They would have never won alone. In fact a smithsonian article describes it as a world war. Being fair the world wars would be: First: 7 years war. Second: The one in wich revolution happened. Third: The Great War. Fourth: The called Second Worl War. Ukraine is not completely alone, recevies supplies, but are fighting alone.
    1
  46.  @zuzudernegger9721  well that doesn’t help, europeans come from central Asia.
    1
  47.  @lif3andthings763  of course it made, they were a lot, they would ve asimilar % of world population
    1
  48.  @lif3andthings763  Because the average wealth yas decreased, expoliated by the english. Still, things are like the past, a minority or rich nobles, a middle class, and a vast amount of poor slaves.
    1
  49.  @lif3andthings763  Well, I forgot to add that the outside world Wealth is too far bigger now than was 400 years ago. Then India was a developed region, now it isn’t.
    1
  50.  @lif3andthings763  India underdeveloped itself, Britain developed it while making it more poor.
    1