Comments by "adamnesico" (@adamnesico) on "Knowledgia"
channel.
-
22
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@duartecboc8028 i cant say you, catolicism in spain agonizes, my grandmas worked.
And sorry, but no catolic country has forbidden women to go to street, unlike muslim ones.
I wonder if you are the one who knows Iberia.
What did portugal did?
Massive maritime advances, end the turkish block in Europe, precursors of european expansion...
If Iberia would be still muslim it would ve as Magreb, poor, underdeveloped, colonized, exporting cheap workers and crime...
you are just an arab wannabe who despise his own countrymen.
Quit your usernane and put ur self the an arab one, you are ashamed of ur countrymen and u are a shame for them, traitor.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ShoXwavee Palestina tambien ha sido siempre invadida por otras civilizaciones. Donde está la diferencia?
Y los judíos han conquistado Tierra santa apra dominarla, como siempre.
No, los muslmanes no mataron a muchos en la peninsula, igual q los israelies tampoco han matado a muchos en palestina. A ninguno les interesaba acabar con los nativos rebeldes, odian usarlos como esclavos.
No, ellos los genocidios los hacen una vez su dominio esta avanzado pra acabar con los últimos restos de pueblos sometidos.
Y ciertas campañas turcas podrían calificarse de genocidio.
Si los odian, otros pueblos hacen lo mismo q los israelies y no os importa porq no son judíos.
Por eso se niegan a someterse a ellos pese a q les dan las mismas opciones q ellos les dieron a los judíos en su día.
Y si, la conversión está tabién disponible.
No es algo q los judios deseen en geneal, pero está permitido.
Los israelies si respetan religiones, hasta los palestinos tienen sus propios tribunaels y escuelas con su propia educacion, como un buen sistema de dimma.
Q odieis a quienes os imitan muestra bien claro el fracaso moral q sois.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nawaf761 No, thy are considered people of the book, not polytheists, most arabs think there is no place for polytheists in the Ummah and enslaved them.
Not a lot, they are quite less of 10 % of the population and everytime less and less due to the continuous bullying.
Christians and jews are fleeing from ur apartheid.
Just see Israel, you hate them because they treat you as you treat dimmis.
Liar, almohads, turks, talibans... kicked them out.
They can get along?Yes. But in the end the intention is to erase them, there are muslim states with basically no dimmis, Magreb was too and almost is today, others were too. The final intention in the end is convert
I provided you a highly clear evidence:
No genocide in Filipines, wich was too conquered by europeans but already knew their diseases.
Just see how even today th amazonian natives keep dying of the diseases.
But no, you wanna keep beleiveing europeans are demons who must be enslaved, xenophob.
If you wouldnt be a racist you would search info about the epidemics.
And what happend in north Africa is not much diferent of what happned in most Latinamerica.
Theyare too mixed people whose culture has been mostly erradicated by the arab colonizers.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Saad.Hattabou You are a liar because you call be treated as brothers to the same treatment that israelis give you.
"We have invaded your land despite you made us no harm, you wont decide anymore, you will be now second class people and accept colonialism. Or you can flee, die or convert"
Same modus operandi in both.
I cant stand narcissists who blame others for things they have done too and they dont care.
Brother? We are no brothers, for you unbelievers are scum.
Me dogmatic? You are the ones who pray yourselves for act like israelis.
Just? Compared with who? With the worse of the class? That makes you no good student.
Yes, they lived in peace, becasue if they revolted, muslims killed all them.
In Granada almost a thousand jews were killed only because one of them had become vizier.
For similar reason jews were wiped from Sahara and Sahel.
If isrealis would be as bloody as you, muslims would live in peace with them too.
Thats like say that someone that you are pointing with a gun doesnt blames u.
Liar, you are pointing only your good side and the worse side of others.
Your are an unfair narcissist.
I too can do the same and say poles welcomed jews and they made it a haven for them, while jews were expelled from at least 4 muslim lands.
If he said that, then why you make everyone to leave their names and customs and replace them with arab ones?
No, for you a muslim who commits crimes for benefit islam is better than any unbeliever, no matter how good he is.
Files? Yes, you do not want to open the files of the occupation of Morocco and Argelia by the arabs and almohads, the massacres of Temur, Aurangzeb, the massacres of the muslims for erase the jews from Sahara and Sahel, the unfair occupation of Egypt, Iran, how a general of the rashiduns rewarded their soldiers with rape the daugther of the man who defended his people...
You lie yourselves because your history is so bad that you cant stand it.
So go, cath all ur hipocrisy, narcissism, egolatry, xenophoby, selfrighteousness, selfdeceiving, double standars, lies... And use them as enema.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@youwhat491 Liar.
Jesus didnt made violece beyond masochism. He could had preeached revolt against romans, many expected it and got disapointed he didnt.
Except Judas, all his disciples practiced peace. Simon made that? Interesting. Wich part of he Bible says thhat?
Unlike Muhammad. He and the rashiduns were warlords.
As soon as Muhammad got power, he did what christians did and throwed the peace and embraced violence.
Diference.
Muhammad made it in 15 years, christians in 280
And dont say me he had no choice. he and his disciples could have returned to peace after take Makka, but no, then went full colonial expansion. They despised peace.
First 3 centuries of christianity: Radical pacifism.
First 3 centuries of Islam: Colonial violence.
Heheheh, if I would write all the lines in Quran wich preach violence, It would take me far more than 3 lines.
Only by that and the behavior fo the prophets and disciples, you can get wich is the most violent.
Hehehehe. How hypocryte. One act of violence by a disciple counts more for you than thousands of deaths ordered by a prophet, some performed in person.
I get it, selfcriticism is totally forbidden in ur faith.
If not, how coud people stand the corruption and tyranny?
1
-
1
-
@youwhat491 Of course you dont beleive it, that would mean Jesus was a better prophet because he became a martyr for his mission.
Muhammad sacrificed nothing.
To heaven to live another day? Then he would have lived many more years.
Jesus died on the cross.
He could had easily commanded an army there were people fighting romans, Barrabas and Judas could had fought for him, 33 years after him there was a great war against the romans. He refused to do, he knew romans were too strong.
Palestines beleived in monofisism, wich beleives in the unique nature of God, not the trinity, so they agreed more with muslims in that matter, so they chose them.
Justice?
Maybe they were just with Umar, but no longer with Utman, the first umayad, Utman was killed by soldiers that came to protest about the injustice of the arab colonial administration.
1
-
@youwhat491 O_O
:O
Just 500 years after the fall of Jerusalem.
Thats so awesome!!!
Why no other muslim has ever taught me that? I have muslim relatives from 17 years ago ,and I have ben troling muslim for years.
Mmmmm if you say that Jesus preached Islam ,why you say that his preach was agressive and of Muhammad, wich became VERY agressive, wasnt? Shouldnt had they preached more or less the same?
Im thinking you are the true trol here.
Both were certainly quite similar, both preached peacefully for years. Jesus said his preach would bring the sword, but he didnt in his life, not his disciples in 3 centuries. Muhammad directly brought the sword.
Both started very similar but ended opposites.
Elephatns in the desert? No birds needed, they woul have died of thirst, and ethiopians knew that, so that seems to be just a kids tale.
You say he sacrificed everything, but you dont say nothing really shocking he lost, simply temptations he refused for faith, so technically he didnt lost things.
Everibody loses relatives, until his death he had a big community of people that loved him and treated him almost as a living god, he ended far more power, prestige and with more wives than he would had had surrendering to temptation.
Nothing? You call nothing to an harem?
Dont lie, guy.
Muhammad didnt sacrificed his sexual desires, he didnt followed the law he preached, and became an example of lust an sex slavery for mankind.
Jesus lost so much in a very short time you dont wana beleive Allah would enable a good prophet to fall so low.
So here is a very important point.
Many people follow not ieas per se, but people.
Good muslims follow Muhammad.
Good christians follow Jesus.
How are u gonna replace in their hearth the love for a man who sacrificed everything for them ( Is a very powerful myth), with the love for a man wich became a powerful warlord with an harem, (wich looks egoist) and his followers became colonial warlords and ended killing each other?
Muhammad is success personified, but other identify more with sacrifice and generosity.
Ey, even arabs say victory is more sweet when u had to make a sacrifice for it.
And for certain, wich one do yo think is more likely to have pacted with the devil?
The one who enjoyed total success and a life of pleasure in this world, or the one who didnt?
For certain, I think that Muhammad was probably the wisest man ever lived.
And that he ended overcamed by his own power, and in the end he surrendered to certain temptations.
Not even the wisest man is safe from arrogance and lust.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hassansaeed6242 yeah, sfter Hitler, all christians welcomed them, and remember, Hitler was friend of the mufti if Jerusalem who preached to kill the jews.
Your racist arrogance blinds u.
Just see, the countries with more jews:
USA, Israel, France, Canada, Russia, UK, Argentina, Germany.
Not a single muslim.
You are a liar.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gzless6226 School doesnt mention such things I said.
Jews went along the other discriminated faith.
Liar, be4 telling lies of acceptance, search: extra credits, samuel hanagid
that totally proofs then you hated jews as much as now.
Islam is the arab religion, its based in arab mentality, the prohpet is arab, the holy book is in arab, the arabs were the coloial empire wich extended it, even today arabs are seen as source of religious authority.
They are the most important ethnicity in islam.
My pious uncle wants me to become a muslim, he is destroying his health for the greater glory of Allah, my best female friend has been 10 years trying to convert me to christianity.
I like none of, I prefer to be bahai, maybe ill convert to that one.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@karimmodewna2457 The kings imposed christianity because many people supported them in doing so.
It wasnt an inmediate thing, it took 3 centuries for christianity to arrive to power in roman empire, and another two for end the pagans.
Then, you cant say that Indonesia chose Islam, what happened is what a minority converted, then such minority killed the ruler and imposed Islam over society.
2 O course there is such thing, you can always forgive the enemy after it has surrender, merciless psycho.
"the ruling class must fall for a new ruler to instaure Islam"
Thanks for proof you are enemies and colonizers of the rest of the world.
Not comparable?
XDXDXDXD
How proud of ur ignorance u are.
What happened in Jerusalem, was the same that happened:
-649: Muslims reconquer Istakhr, massacring its inhabitans and destroying its holy sites.
-1064: Muslims capture Ani in a great bloodbath. In many streets muslims coulndt pass due to the number of corpses. Lots of slaves were taken, and part of them were later killed for fun. The armenians became a shadow of what they previously were in the first armenian holocaust.
-1244: Muslims retake Jerusalem in a bloodbath and destroyed the city to a point that no more crusades to Jerusalem were done because only a ruin of it remained.
-And all the previous things are nothing compared to the reign of Temur, city after city taken, the civilians slaughtered, muslims dropping from the towers women and children, and beheading thosadns for make skull columns outside.
You blame others for the same things you did and dont have any remorse for them, hypocryte.
By the way, add Poland to the list, after its conversion to christianity Poland didnt imposed it, pagans remained in the country for centuries. When the crusaders asked Poland to choose between impose christianity on the remaining pagans or war, poles chose war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Mariothemuslim "We are foreigners, w have arrived here because our religion says we are superior. you will no longer rule your homeland. Choose: Sumbit, or ruin"
That was the attititude of both muslim conquerors and israelis.
People who refused dhimma had to flee for avoid to be killed or enslaved.
Like palestinians.
Diference is most iberians either submitted or fled. Palestinin mostly either fled o fought. Palestines chose ruin because their religion taught them to do.
Each got what they chose.
Oh,and that was just the beginning.
The arabs soon instaured an apartheid state where natives couldnt be part of the govern, even if converting to Islam.
In the crisis of the 9th century, natives rebelled against he aparheid, and arabs killed them.
10 centruy, the one of caliphate, was one of prosperity. Still, 1/3 of christian dimmis fled because they were tired of discrimination. And that was a prosperous time.
11 century, the almoravids deport christians to Magreb because they are suspected to help christian kingdoms.
12 century: Almohads force all dimmis to flee or convert. They too kill the muslims who ressist them in clear terror tactics.
So, you can see that the evil christian did, muslims had already done. And you dont care.
Hypocryte.
Proofs? Read historic chronicles.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@messersmidthleo7562 Why so much hate and lies?
Thats what Muhammad desired, that you hate others and say lies?
I can diferentiate about them.
And I know about the aculturation campaigns.
Most egytians identify as arab, not as the native copts.
An arab rulers ordered to kill any person who knw to read kwarazmian for destroy their culture.
In Magreb there were done campaigns for quit the bebers their culture and become arab.
The sanhaja were once the greatest berber nation. Their language is almost extinct due to nforced aculturation.
Most people in Magreb today are arab, not berber.
In Turkey, the anatolians and greeks were forced to become turk.
In Spain the islamised posh guys said that latin langues should be forbidden.
Andalusis didnt saw themselves as latin or iberian, that for them was a lesser identity.
Swahilis claimed to be iranaian for feel better than their neighbours.
So, enable me to doubt that you would have respected the identity of the colonized natives.
Not the spanish, the goths.
Both were german invaders
Liar, Islam didnt preserved the vandals, no trace of their culture remain.
In fact,according to byzantyne sources, vandals had been ended by eastern romans.
Vandals ended in Tunes. You didnt knew that? Learn history.
And maybe intelectual revolution, but no ethical revolution, muslims enlslaved and conquered the tunisians without any provocation, the muslim leader motivated their soldiers offering them to rape the daughter of the leader.
1
-
1
-
@messersmidthleo7562 Dont put in my fingers words that Ive never written.
I havent said that christian rule would had been better.
I cant see how spanish colonisation could had been betterr than the muslim one.
Although the europeans learned the plantation slavery from the musims, with muslims was never as horrible. Although the zanj rebels of iraq probably had a idea about how horrible that was.
Too, no hogs no cocolitzin, millions of deads could had been avoid, but the ones of smallpox or malaria would had happened aniways.
But muslim didnt happened. They didnt went far away for conquest in ship.
Im no so optimistic with religions.
I know they teach wisdom, but they too teach to despise others.
In fact is a personality trait.
Pesons with strong volunty too tend to despise others, their strong volunty comes from the strong beleif that things must be done in certain way and no other.
Just today I read about the man who caused the end of the jews of Sahara.
He was admired as a wise man, he wrote treaty of wisdom, good rule, became such an important authority in Sahel in nth next centuries...
And he always encouraged war to the jews, to always despise the unbelievers, to make jhad over bad muslims...
Under his taching, sahel muslims became extremely xenophobic.
That man was probably the intelectual founder of Boko Haram.
I dont doubt here was many wisdom in that man. But too a lot of hate.
Those peoples who used religion for harm are as representative as the ones who used it for good. Religions are like weapons. We choose if we use them for good or bad.
Yes, is true that ottomans were tolerant with their european vassals.
Its sad they changed such tolerance for the genocidal european nationalism.
Slavic? I heard that albanians are the last tracians.
Linguists say the most similar language to albanian was the dacian.
Greeks said that if tracians would joined, they woud had conquered the world.
Thats what would had happned f Grigj Kastriot would had borned between them.
Or maybe not?
Maybe the problem of the tracians was they never had a dream for join people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fahadfahad5153 Those people of the golden arab age mostly werent arabs, but arabized people.
Bagdad was built near Ctesifon. Abasids=Arabized iranians.
Again, ibn Khaldun said true arabs werent part of the golden age of culture.
So, according to you, Abana al Gouthi was a goth living in 18 century Mali after 3 or 6 centurys of lineage arrival.
Of course he wasnt, he identified himself as songhay, what he was due to the female linages. But according to your mysongin law, he wasnt, so he was forced to divorce his wife for lack an honourable lineage.
Then you can see how a nonsense is your misoginistic view that only the direct male lineage matters.
Abdel Rahman 3 dyed of black his hair for look something he wasnt: Arab.
Abdelrahman Sanchuelo was called that for look like his christian grandpa.
So dont say mom doesnt matter.
Ibn Khaldun ancestors had mixed with amazigh women, and probably iberian. Such mix cant be called yemeni. He said that only bedouins have purity of lineage, anyone else is mixed.
Is that rejection of the mix part of arab culture? Ibn Khaldoun said arab just to the bedouins. And he hated them.
Banu Qasi (Sons of Casio)of Zaragoza are tought to had been muladis, not ancient arabs. In fact they never liked Cordoba govern.
You are wrong, almoravids and almohads werent arabs and ruled Andalusia.
Say that arabs are scholars is like say that vikings founded USA.
Ibn Khaldun was the greatest mocker of arabs Ive ever seen.
If he did, why not me?
1
-
1
-
@fahadfahad5153 Yes, that thing of fake the ascendacy because arab racism was very common. Its very possible that Ibn Khaldun faked his ascendancy.
Conquered people that had never been ocnquered? For example?
Not, the most powerful state of the world was China, arabs didnt conquered it.
Neither they conquered the gokturks khanates, neither were able of conquer the core byzantyne lands.
Bedouins dont have. Other peoples that were conquered by them and forced to become arab in a typical act of colonialism had good culture.
Not half, arabs didnt ruled neither China, India or Europe, those are more than half.
Mongolians ruled half or more of the known world, and they are honest and didnt went claiming they had a great culture.
Diference? Wait to the end of petroleum demand, see how arabs will have to leave their luxuries and return to the camels an goats.
See Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lybia, Yemen... Those are true arabs without petroleum
1
-
1
-
@fahadfahad5153 Nasrids ruled Granada, not Iberia, and they lasted 250 years bribing the christians with tributes for not be expelled.
Arabs never ruled any part of China.
China, India, and Europe together are far more than the umayad caliphate.
Yes, you live in luxury thanks to petroleum, whose demand is lowing, your savings fade year after year.
See Yemen or Jordan, or Egypt that is what you would live without petroleum.
And you would be shia because Iran would conquer you. Either that or flee. What would u choose?
Only 3 centuries. Well, in my case is 5, im from Granada.
The chinese army was defeated for venture far from their lands.
Arabs too did that, and the city of Kashgar soon passed form arabs to the chinese.
Its unknown what happened to the arab garrison of Kashgar.
Both countries remained at their own side of the Tien Shan monts, at least chinese ventured much farther in the the otherr side, so that shows that they were the strongest.
For be the same arabs should have conquered Tarim and part of Mongolia.
I can acknowledge many things arabs did, but I wont acknowldge lies like the 500 centuries rule of Iberia.
1
-
1
-
@fahadfahad5153 Why would those real arabs go to another arab country to work if they dont in reality? And why would that make any diference? It would be still a poor country.
Of previous post that I forgot to answer...
Well, if we talk about monuments, christian Spain is the best monuments builder ever.
Spain is second country in architectonic world heritage site. And if we add all the monuments built in America in the spanish empire. Spain is by far the first.
Mmmmm if impose tribute isnt equl to rule, then Muslims didnt ruled Spain not even for a century.
An arab amy reached Paris? Sources?
Where is your source of China paying tribute to the Caliphate?
I cant beleive that part, chinese emperors were too much arrogant, they would have prefered to declare war.
My belief? This isnt a christian country anymore.
And Ishmael didnt built the Kaaba, noone in Judea would have ventured in the barren Araby.
You just wanted to be as cool as the jews, so you forced yourselves in the myth jews, like khazars did.
So, you recognise the jews are more cool.
Historians knows how much muslims like to fake ascendancies for be cool.
Are you of low IQ due to inbreeding? Noone can survive naked in Spain mountains.
If all the turks woul have entered Islam after Talas, they wouldnt had been the biggest source of slaves in Iran.
My people defeated the arabs, the vikings, the amazigh, the inglish, the italian, the french, the hindu, the bantu, the swahili, the tupi, the caribes, the mexica, the mayans, the quechua, the mapuche, the somalians, the malays, the japanese, the ottomans, the sweds...
And when your people were just serving the turks, my people were conquering 2 world empires bigger the arab califate. And that lasted a similar time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
abis9 alpha9 Better armor? How?
A bit more advanced isnt far more advanced.
Better bows? Composite? Those rot with europe humidity, making them useless.
Greek fire? That didnt mattered in France, land fight.
Reinforcemetns from Bagdad? Epic fail XDXDXDXD
Bagdad was done by he abasids, abasids werent expansionists, and the umayad dinasty of alAndalus was an independent enemy state.
Damascus reinforcements were send for take down revolts, not for new conquests.
I seem to know better than you this history.
Huge armies in alAndalus? Examples?
alAndalus was far away from vikings, and with far less big rivers, if they would had been as near and wet as the franks and saxons would have taken far more raids.
Why would they have adapted if the ottomans never did? Precipitations is no small thing, in fact is half of the reason that make Russia so dificult to invade.
A big amry requires big logistics carts, and they get trapped in mud.
Do you believe muslims would like to making a campaign having to pray stained with mud, against their hygiene rituals?
No, alAndalus alone wouldnt have achieved it. With the support of the caliphate could had been possible, but that support didnt existed.
Learn better ur own story, both were called to Damascus for fire them, Musa was killed for corruption, Tariq did nothing bad and was made a beggar and forbidden to return.
Al Thaqafi, the conqueror of Pakistan, too was killed.
The 3 men that conquered the farthest lands were punished. The argument is strong.
Khalid was fired for be the best conqueror and personal enemy of Umar, and gods knows if he was poisoned. Who knows how many more conquests he would have done if wouldnt had been fired.
Sad Waqqas was a companion of Muhammad, Amr was a relative of the caliph Utman, both were trusted, rashiduns werent as paranoid as the umayads after the fitna, and aniways the lands they conquered were near.
You are being blinded by your own prejudices. I know how strong were rashidun armies.
But as usual, the quality of the founders faded with time.
And Iberia was too easy of conquer because it was full of arrians and jews that welcomed the muslims, tired of catholic represion. France was full of catholics that would have resisted and revolted against muslim domination.
Too, another campaign could have taken place after Tours if not for the fall of the Umayads due to their inhability of maintain unity.
You are suposing a cohesion that simply didnt existed.
Aniway, how do u wanna be taken seriously after the Bagdad phrase?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1