Youtube comments of David Farrington (@davidfarrington4308).
-
154
-
121
-
115
-
107
-
96
-
90
-
89
-
87
-
69
-
67
-
66
-
54
-
48
-
47
-
44
-
34
-
34
-
26
-
21
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Dominic_Amoe Sir, I left the Sheriff's Office to work as a federal agent. I sacrificed my career to testify against US government contractors who murdered Iraqis, including two little boy victims. We must oppose government oppression. That's not what happened here. Based on our information, an aggressive inmate created a chaotic situation with a superior opponent. The jailer had to be decisive in response to the inmate's actions. We are accustomed to law enforcement accepting abuse for fear of second-guessing by civilian analysts. I don't know this jailer's training, but he looks like a fighter. Notice how he evades a right hook. He probably knows that a man can only absorb so many traumatic brain injuries in a lifetime, and he wasn't waiting to get one. An inmate must adapt to his environment. Having already allegedly spoken aggressively, raising his hand was an unacceptable escalation. We don't have audio, which could change our analysis, but with the information we have, the inmate created a chaotic situation, and the jailer reacted decisively to protect himself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1