Comments by "chimneysway" (@chinmeysway) on "" video.

  1. logical fallacy here i feel like. is it left or how is that really expressed. is that kind of your inference, it’s automatically left if not right? while there are a few ways to read into things that are pretty loaded and cryptic, his rational is still that: loaded and cryptic. it’s not exempt of political maneuvering and alignment. his endorsement of 1M to the presidential looser / winner whatever ya call that guy seems to suggest something like more than a tax write off wouldn’t ya say? there’s key factors like this and from over the years to consider surrounding the stance of why this is benefits meta / rich political figures too - not voters not the working class not ppl who want non biased news and info. he doesn’t care about hate speech or not hate speech - i mean gotta consider that he was straight threatened by Donny (utilizing harassment via free speech mind you) to be imprisoned in his book, so maybe that has something to do w it. if harris won there’s no way he’d be doing this! all the rich dummies gotta placate / play politics. they worked w biden to tame hate speech. why is that. meta is gonna freedumb down the political and corporate layers and interests. or you think billionaire really just want to align with how passionate they are to the constitution. why did he mention gender? ppl might not realize that politics and billionaires aren’t really separable it seems like. or that hate speech is violence and a form of disinformation basically.
    9
  2. “dealing with it” is more complex than you’re accounting for perhaps. Hatefulness and expression of hate is not so separable from harassment in many many cases. Federal laws prohibit harassment based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age (40 or older), disability, genetic information, status as a protected veteran, or protected activity (such as filing a discrimination complaint or participating in a discrimination investigation or lawsuit). See any overlap?
    8
  3. if confused still: billionaires and government are the same thing now. they both want a thing now that’s different from the thing during last presidency that was agreed on. meta and Biden agreed on curbing hate speech; meta and trump now agree on unleashing said curb. i think curbing disinformation is best personally regardless of who designs it bc ppl lack critical thinking skills and become askew from logic and facts. then you end up w support for a really unamerican disaster for a hero / president. it’s a shame so many ppl engage constantly w social media to begin. it gets too real like part of our nervous systems and it’s all merely sound bite quality info and debate meanwhile zuch gets uber rich as do all metas share holders. think of hatefulness in text format coming at you or attacking others as disinformation. really oppressive hateful disinformation. we gotta move further away from the dark ages. yea? not closer to it. the 70s are closer to it. it’s 2025 tho now so, to me less oppression by way of hatefulness being simply demoted seems more light than dark. the best thing would of course be if less ppl used it at all like the best thing is if meta went bankrupt honestly esp if it sides now with bias toward oppression via unfiltering hate. filters are not infringement on freedumb of speech ps. letting reins go of filters coinciding with enforcement of a promoter of oppression and hate is of thee essence in concern. it’s like invitation to be shitty to trans ppl and migrants. like can you guess who hates them? if you guessed current corporate elect donald zuk then you win a prize. 🎉
    6
  4. holy cow you’re good at this ! well done / impressive
    5
  5. billionaires and government are the same thing now. they both want a thing now that’s different from the thing during last presidency that was agreed on. meta and Biden agreed on curbing hate speech; meta and trump now agree on unleashing said curb. i think curbing disinformation is best personally regardless of who designs it bc ppl lack critical thinking skills and become askew to logic and facts. then you end up w support for a really unamerican disaster for a hero / president. it’s a shame so many ppl engage constantly w social media to begin. it gets too real like part of our nervous systems and it’s all merely sound bite quality info and debate meanwhile zuch gets uber rich as do all metas share holders. think of hatefulness in text format coming at you or attacking others as disinformation. really oppressive hateful disinformation. we gotta move further away from the dark ages. yea? not closer to it. the 70s are closer to it. it’s 2025 tho now so, to me less oppression by way of hatefulness being simply demoted seems more light than dark. the best thing would of course be if less ppl used it at all like the best thing is if meta went bankrupt honestly esp if it sides now with bias toward oppression via unfiltering hate. filters are not infringement on freedumb of speech ps. letting reins go of filters coinciding with enforcement of a promoter of oppression and hate is of thee essence in concern. it’s like invitation to be shitty to trans ppl and migrants. like can you guess who hates them? if you guessed current corporate elect donald zuk then you win a prize. 🎉
    4
  6. just one aye. nope there’s literally millions of ppl that share similar perspectives as this basic ration take. not identical bc there’s plenty of nuance of course. this dude totally flip flopped contingent upon who’s in office. hell. he’ll do it again in a few years probably. speaking of flocks and helplessness, to borrow your language.
    2
  7. is a soundbite quality bipartisan statement supposed to go anywhere here? take out the politics. seems likely meta bends to whatever it’s user base trends toward in a soundbite oversimplified kind of fashion and right now more ppl are worried about freedom than not worried. it’s just a business ploy i mean you really think he cares about freedom or speech of ppl get harassed or disinformation? he cares about being in competition with Xtwit, it appears. is this fact? there no access to that. is it liberal to distrust billionaires motives? it’s not a brand of politics and like what even is liberal anymore. you think that it’s very different than you but hmm it’s not likely!
    2
  8. i feel like there’s plenty of it actually and from the us. sometimes it’s annoying actually the amount of the A version or the B version in at least mainstream and well indy media as well. one is more sane of course, but the slander from moderate left has fuct us i feel like.
    2
  9. loosing? you mean gaining giving pres trauma 1M is gaining extremists
    2
  10.  @rachelk4805 not the case on IG though i’d assume? his other twin baby
    2
  11. or just read books or draw and skip it? it’s not that healthy and it’s not food lol
    1
  12. and IG?
    1
  13. fact is if harassment has federal protection then why not protection against hate given there’s much overlap: Federal laws prohibit harassment based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age (40 or older), disability, genetic information, status as a protected veteran, or protected activity (such as filing a discrimination complaint or participating in a discrimination investigation or lawsuit).
    1
  14. lol uh… can you elaborate? depends on the ppl talking together. notice i said together and not at each other. social m just makes it useless talking at each other soundbite quality so. no real reason to partake
    1
  15. alphabet? never heard of. probably better that way
    1
  16. in what world will it’s users check themselves with extreme constant usage of it giving it so much power tho ?
    1
  17.  @SimonBellaMondo cute. you’ve either been waiting 20 yrs to ask this or you use this soundbite quality wanna be analogy like every three comments to help fight “erratic gender chaos” that you’re morally troubled by for some groupthink ignorant immature reason.
    1
  18.  @justmechilling... instagram is same thing / mark is ceo of meta who owns it (sorry if i misunderstood tho)
    1
  19. he’s out of college? yeah… ppl are waaaaaay way tooaddicted to it though like at monumental usage unhealthy levels for all ages basically and they aren’t gonna care to stop that either of course. so if it were just banned—oh wait billionaires are the government now never mind
    1