Comments by "Peter \x26 Pete" (@PeterPete) on "" video.

But the vote didn't say HOW the UK would leave the EU. Remember also there are many people settled and living in NI who identify themselves as Irish not British therefore people in NI have access to the single market and they can freely travel throughout ROI, which is a member state of the EU. Because of this the UK could NEVER fully withdraw from the EU. People should have known that in 2016 and you should certainly know that by now!!!
3
That's it, just sit at your computer and post comments!! That'll get you nowhere!!
2
One man's crap is another man's treasure 👍
1
@SaltimusMaximus but there was no treasure whatsoever. Just be thankful the mainly English people helping migrants/asylum seekers get money out of it 👍
1
@billsmith3771 I just like to think Brexiteers are literally insane, deluded and as one person described Ann Widdecombe to be, evil.
1
@stephenbarlow3617 Oh look, someone with a brain!!! Yes the only way the UK can fully leave the EU is by withdrawing British people from NI. Still, at least the Unionists in NI can always have a place to live in GB, like the Hong Kongers, Afghans, Iraqis and others 👍
1
Don't be so silly David, the country has and will always be governed by the ruling Monarch!!
1
@davidraddings8211 You clearly were asleep when Charles took his oath to govern the people of the UK on 6th May!!
1
@davidraddings8211 hahaha,your comments get funnier as they go along, yesI am aware the pm must have regular meetings with Charles and the conversation is kept private. So as Charles has taken the oath to govern the people, rishi, as a good subject has to visit Charles and talk about how his work is going in parliament and other business relating to governing the people. Rishi is just Charles 'yes man'. Remember even rishi has taken an oath to bear true allegiance to Charles. If you think Charles does not govern the people of the UK, imo you really are demented.
1
@davidraddings8211 oh and why does rishi have to get Charles to sign things off and get his approval on matters? Why was the Windsor framework done and dusted before MP's could vote on it? It's because the Windsor framework was approved by Charles because he holds sovereignty over the people of NI, Gb etc.
1
@davidraddings8211 what constitution?? the UK doesn't have a formal constitution so I don't know where you get your info from! btw if you refer to the Magna Carta that was agreed in 1215 and only applied to the relationship between King john and barons who were under him. The Magna Carta does not apply to the people. Many of the 'rights' have been repealed since then! The Crown has sovereignty over the people and you and I are subjected to Crown rule.
1
@davidraddings8211 Well if you disliked how your boss was managing you, you could raise a grievance and perhaps expect your boss not to be so hard on you. You could even formulate an agreement with your boss to prevent your boss from 'bossing' you around in a particualr way that made you feel persecuted or threatened. It would give you some protection. That's more or less why the Magna Carta was brought about, to stop the tyrannical King John persecuting the very Barons under him. So the agreement was not between King John and the people. People can't get along with each other. One only has to look at Brexit to see that people don't get on which is why the Monarch has the sovereignty of the people. So the MP's cannot work for the people because they can't please everyone but they can all please the Monarch. The UK does not have a codified constitution, it's constitution lies in its traditions and customs. For example, the MP's cannot carry out their duties in parliament's chamber without the Royal Mace present. The Mace is there to symbolise the presence of the Monarch and remind the MP's of their oaths of allegiance. All the information is there staring at people but imo many people think Charles is only ceremonial which is complete and utter BS!!
1
@davidraddings8211 Charles is boss. Have you not ever worked and experienced what it's like to be under someone else?
1
@davidraddings8211 Under who? What's that in reference to? And what has this got to do with EU ? Charles is sovereign over the people of the UK so the EU can never rule the people. Oh and people like you would complain the EU is undemocratic, well Charles' form of governance is undemocratic because you never got a vote on whether you wanted him to govern you!!!
1
@davidraddings8211 Quote - Democracy is only for Germany & France. The EU is made up of 27 member states not just Germany and France. There are people from EVERY member state who sits on the European Commission. The European Parliament is made up of (s)elected representatives from EVERY member state. Whilst Britain was in the EU, the country had an opportunity to exert its place in Europe but with the likes of Farage who was only there to criticise it instead of working with it, Britain didn't get anywhere. Most member states within the EU have proportional representation which means every vote counts. Under the FPTP system here in the UK, if a Tory or Reform voter voted in a heavily Labour dominated area their votes are wasted. I guess you have a fear of Germans and the French. Guess you have hang ups from the World Wars. I also guess you're one of those Royal lovelies who thinks Charles is just ceremonial and doesn't govern the people of the UK? Complete madman imo!!
1
@davidraddings8211 The EU's democracy exists within it's Parliament as all MEP's are (s)elected by members of the poublic in each member state. Members of the EU commission are elected and only in place for a specific number of years and they can put forward policies to the European Parliament for them to accept or reject. The Commission steers the direction of the European Union,, so they could be likened to the role Charles plays in the UK. Charles can easily steer Parliament as he is lawfully the only person in place to govern but when he dies he'll be replaced by another unelected and unaccountable heir. The EU is more democratically representative than the UK. I hear Charles wants to get more involved in UK politics - that'll make people think twice that he's just ceremonial hahaha!!
1
Reform what? Hahaha, they won't reform anything, they're no different to all the rest. Oh and remember all MP's and Lords swear oaths of allegiance to the Monarch, not to you!!!
1
Hey lots of blacks and Asians working in care homes wiping the backsides of white English people who have worked hard all their lives, paid their taxes only to end up in a care home because society doesn't care about them anymore!!! Btw, the white english people aren't having many kids these days and many young people are avoding doctors.
1
Quote - get our sovereignty back..................that's so funny. You've never had sovereignty. It was stolen from you by the Monarch. Charles is sovereign not the people. Hahahaha!!
1
@billmccarthy9689 How on earth can people self-govern?? If everyone wanted the same things in society then they could self-govern but people want different things out of their society. It's just laughable of you to think people can self govern when they can't even get on with one another. Charles swore an oath to govern the people of the UK because the people cannot get on with each other. The people therefore cannot self-govern so your idea of sovereignty goes out of the window. Were you asleep when Charles' coronation took place?
1
@billmccarthy9689 you can say what you like you still can't change the fact Charles took an oath on 6th may to govern the people, nobody else in the UK takes that oath, not Boris Johnson, rishi sunak, keir starmer won't, in fact no politician will ever take that oath. All Lords and MP's swear an oath of allegiance to Charles, not to the people. Monarch first, money second, people third. Charles rules absolutely over the people of the UK. You've been reading too much fantasy from Simon de montford.
1
@sharonwashington8150 I don't vote because all the while Charles governs the people not much will change 👍
1