Comments by "TheEVEInspiration" (@TheEVEInspiration) on "Is the Netherlands Now Europe’s Most Right-Wing Government?" video.

@9Q9M You mean where the food is made to feed everyone? Good luck turning much of that into cities. You have no right to just enter my home and change my priorities. The same is true for populations and countries!
69
You forgot the main group! "Pharmacists"
16
Not true, many places in the big cities are already over half non-Dutch and people feel like an alien in their own country due to that. In some places 90% is not Dutch, with a very large portion of those not even speaking Dutch. And shops in the streets have names written in non-west European languages, primarily super-markets. There is nowhere for young Dutch people to socialize, its a complete takeover. A stolen future. I am not sure where you live, but I do know where you do not live!
8
They are very pro-EU, meaning they are pretty left in that regard. This is countered by striving to more decentralization in the country itself.
4
Another big lie is that we need worker immigration. All it does is impoverish the working class and stagnate innovation. Why buy proper machinery when you can exploit and underpay? And the influx of people drives up prices, housing in particular. That is cost for unproductive assets, meaning an economic disaster mostly paid for by working class people. It also results in sky-high taxes and that again destroys the economy by making it less efficient. This also reduces freedom and innovation. So stop parroting the propaganda that got us in this mess please and learn some basic economic facts. And also keep in mind the AI development, many jobs will require far less people in the near future. And another thing you might bring up that is also propaganda (seems to be your thing) is about the low birthrate. Much of this is actually caused by the high taxes and immigration. People living till their 30s in their parents house. Not getting paid enough due to the abundance of foreign workers that via all sort of constructs will always be cheaper. And thus not being able to save and start a family. Immigration and everything connected to it, including the EU, is destroying us all. And that is the cold hard fact!
3
@IwillBwaiting Tell that do the generations that never get to build a normal life.
2
Name one thing that makes them earn the qualification "right wing"!
2
@user-df1ns1ob8y And how do you think that came to be exactly? Hint: demographics change.
2
What a nonsense and slander. There is nothing right wing about them...they are social-economically left. These days, representing those who elect you is called right wing.
2
Do not conflate the media with the people. Granted, many still will just parrot the media as they are being shielded from "politically undesired information". But those that do no know more are not pro-Ukraine in the sense you most likely think. And what does that even mean, pro-Ukraine...extending the war, destroying more of them? more immigration, so there is no Ukraine left even if the war ends? To be truly pro-Ukraine is to demand peace instead of sending weapons, money and everything else to worsen the chance on ending the war.
1
Meaning even the VVD voters already being fooled for a decade with a left-operating leadership did not accept a move that would result in an extension of that. The people do NOT want left government, but due to political betrayal and purges we did end up with left governments time and time again. Giving power to people and politicians the population absolutely did not want.
1
It's conditional and not going to happen for now! This is how politics works 1. Israel really wants it really badly. 2. Many Arab states do not want it. By making it conditional and not having a commitment to do it, we gain political leverage over both. It is really clever when you think about it.
1
A bit of realism has set in, but his ideals will not be different.
1
@marcelschellekens6386 None of those makes a party right wing. It just makes them sane and non-extremist. You do know the EU is a very extremist project, right? Administratively submitting and socially and economically destroying almost an entire continent. And you do know the public broadcasting has been totally one-sided and really, just like in the USA, acts like a propaganda institute for the left. I find it hilarious that all you indoctrinated lefties thing you are the center and normal. Whereas you only have to go back a few decades to see how things were radically different.
1
@user-df1ns1ob8y In the mid 60 Libanon was wealthy, it was just poorly distributed. Not unlike some other rich countries in the region today. And no I do not think we will go down as hard as they did. But I do think we will see a great war in Europe as the result of the EU, be it in its late states or after the breakup. And be fair, no-one expected misery in the neutral Netherlands as the result of a new world war. Let alone by the Germans. It was actually Belgium that has hate towards us for allowing Germany to pass through in WW1. So, think again. Outright expecting our extreme actions won't have consequences or that the outcome won't be bad and thus we do not have to think about the consequences is actual insanity. You just confirmed your own insanity!
1
@IwillBwaiting I smell the sarcasm! Immigration is all about short term private enrichment of the few, paid for by long term socializing of all the costs that result from it (which are astronomically higher).
1
@SarastistheSerpent An interesting observation. My stance has always been to look at the economic and politics side of things. You know, the things that matter a lot and have impact. Do they strive for centralization and dictating what the masses should get/can keep and what they are allowed to think? Then they are left, historically accurate and the most extreme examples of course are USSR, NSDAP, Mao...and a few others. I will add the EU in that same category and every party that is very pro-EU. I found them all to be very anti-democratic in every way imaginable. These are also the parties that clearly want the destruction of the culture and societies. You can see that in LGBTQ+ policies and immigration. Again, you can make the references to history very accurately along these lines. So for me the most left wing is certainly VOLT, D66, GL/PvdA. Not far followed by VVD, CDA, CU. The SP i have a love/hate view on. Mostly because their solutions are always to grow government, dictate top-down, instead of making things easier for people to do it themselves how they want things done. So SP might be more classical socialist these days, but they had their more radical incidents in the past as well. I would not like to see them ever getting a majority, pretty scary in that sense. But they could be worked with in a coalition I think, it is a matter of trust. It is not like with the other mentioned parties that they are outright evil!
1
@maasro "I see you have a very peculiar definition for left. You seem to confuse it with authoritarian, which is in no way exclusively left-wing" Franco was fascism, which is a form of socialism, which is universally recognized as left. Again, centralization of power, totalitarian control. Also fascism and communism differ very little, especially from the position of a regular citizen. The former is also somewhat derived from the latter. Both are extreme forms of socialism. So it is no wonder the left gets associated with authoritarian politics. Even the softer forms, will always want to grow government and arrange society based on a simplistic narrative ("workers", specifically, teachers, nursers, police, firemen). They barely mention regular jobs when they talk, its like talking to a 6 year old about what they want to be when they grow up. "Parties that are censoring personal freedom of gender expression are by definition authoritarian (they are forbidding individuals freedoms of expression and dictating what the masses should keep and think)..." You are inverting the actual meaning of LGBTQ+ laws. These are NOT meant to protect fragile groups and shield them from "hate". They are meant to cause chaos and attack/frame enemies, and deny them normalcy. 20 years ago, there was no such thing as pronounce policing, I never seen any gay or lesbian demand I call them in any special way. They got all the rights and protections they needed, namely the same as everyone else. Sure it took them some protesting to be able to be able to marry by law, but they got that too and with broad support I might add! The vast majority of people just don't care if others are a little different and want to live the same. What people however do not like is not being left alone by obnoxious behaving people. This LGBTQ+ thing is also a recent phenomenon, maybe late 90s I saw the first glimpse in an article and that was just about not having to choose between male and female. Then nothing for at least a decade! Never met anyone that was "special" in that they were not having the same social norms as the rest. And all of a sudden there needs to be special protection and politicians push one draconian law after the other about it. People can be thrown in jail, their lives destroyed with brute force just by some feeling different in the afternoon. The "shield" acts like a social/economic wrecking ball. And that is exactly its intention by the extremists in power! And these laws take freedoms, assets and means of living away from ordinary well socialized people. It hands opportunists and activists the tools to just pretend and get their opponents destroyed by claiming hate crimes and all that. So you are very wrong on this issue, don't get fooled by any "friendly well meaning names" of these laws. They typically do or even explicitly intent the exact opposite! We live in Orwellian times! When extremism and totalitarianism are the trend such as is now, normal people are called extreme / "far opposite political direction".
1
@xway2 What they say they want and what they do are two different things. We are in a cycle of ever more debt and ever less responsibility of those in leadership positions. We opened out borders, actively bringing people in and financing that. That is NOT remotely economically conservative or promoting trade. Only a totalitarian system with lots of misery. Only the very big companies like such a system as it crushes the smaller competition. Especially the one huge market! This reduces innovation too. No, they are not pro economic development. They are more like fascist in the sense that they want corporations to rule us.
1
@xway2 Buddy, my position is more like how it was in the EEG a few decades in the past. Politically smaller, economic co-operation instead of a "Third reich" or a "EUSSR". That used to be the center, this major shift to the left was enforced top-down. It is NOT the will of people. See what the hot issues are among the population, and then watch how they are ignored and the opposite is done! I am not religiously right and I am only mildly economic right. But most parties do as if they are left of Mao and are implementing a forced cultural revolution in Europe. You cannot say, that because the traitors to the people are acting left, the center shifted to the left. That is just always letting such extremism win. That is not democratic, nor co-operation, but downright occupation.
1
Never needed an EU for that, so your whole point is nonsense.
1
Yeah "right-wing" is just a slur the left uses to shame their political opponents for things they themselves did in the past. Their usual behavior, zero self-reflection and always very aggressive and unfair.
1
@mormacil A lot of it is pretty grounded and not hard to accomplish. Keeping the existing nuclear reactors open to help keep an reliable energy grid and keep energy costs in check...easy...its done! Building more reactors...can be done in 4 years, the last one was I think build even quicker. Changing the rules for work immigrants, stroke of a pen and its reality. And the list goes on and on. There are a few harder things to accomplish for sure, but its good to have a few of those as well. If no-one starts anything because it ain't easy, then nothing will ever move!
1
@mormacil You act like the owner does not want to exploit, nor expand the reactor site and that a government has to force it to. And you act like there have been no expansion plans at all by the owner. Typically its governments impeding/closing such plants, not the other way around! Or private parties delaying because they are unsure if the government will abort the project half-way after many costs have been made. You are thinking like a totalitarian here, detached from reality. You also forget that depending on the reactor type, one can install them way quicker than even 4 years. Making the whole deal more of an administrative one. And as long as the exiting location is used that already has all the permits and waste storage covered, there is very little in the way! It is just a matter of will! You also act like any change requires complete withdrawal from treaties. Implying there are no bounds and bounds are forbidden. As in the whole world population can set up shop here. Clearly you are talking BS for the purpose of demoralizing any opposing position. Again, you are thinking and acting like an extremist. So instead of telling me to do research, I would advice you to actually think in reality instead of generalizing in fantasies and thinking you are cool that way.
1
@mormacil People do things for money indeed, money talks. That is easily solvable for a government in the Netherlands, there is a lot of spending, this will be just a drip (if even that). Wilders never collapsed a government, it was actually another party, but they framed it on him. Politically expedient that was and with a press that does as it is told, few will get any wiser! You argued that the government would have to force the existing reactor to stay open. And talked about nationalization. How is that not thinking like an authoritarian? "I never said we couldn't physically install one in four years, I said we couldn't in practice because of red tape. Did you even read my comment? And it's not a matter of will because current paperwork doesn't extend to new reactors. Just because I have a permit to build a guest house in my backyard doesn't grand me the right to build several more. Permits tend to have very strictly defined limits. Like the maximum power production, number of reactors, allowance of cooling water, etc" And permits are handed out by governments! Using the existing site will avoid a lot of red-tape. The infrastructure is there, the grid is tuned for it too. Changes will be minor compared to building one somewhere else! Do not forget there were already plans for expansion in the past, and even a schedule for actually expanding. Meaning there was and is room for expansion, that is a hard fact. "Again you're showing quite an ignorance on how the world actually works. So I reiterate, do some research into the actual facts and stop creating wishful thinking that ignores all the genuine obstacles. Not because it makes me cool but because it would benefit you to have realistic goals when you vote. " Advice for yourself. I clearly put forward sensible argument, hard to dispute them as they are factual. All you can do is throw up sand at this point.
1
Your feelings are more than that! "right-wing" is a modern slur the left uses to shame their political opponents for things they themselves did in the past. Their usual behavior, zero self-reflection and always very aggressive and unfair. The left has been in power for a long time, but blame all problems on them not having sufficient power and shaming their opponents. Did you notice it is always the upcoming opposition parties that are framed?
1
@mormacil Just calling them right-wing is an affront to the truth. As the OP wrote, they are actually moderately left in many things and it's just their sensible stance on immigration that gets all the attention. Good for him, because that is what the people want to see addressed! And it might be a shocker to you, but a LOT of immigrants that have naturalized (e.g. are Dutch by law) also voted for him. It is not as if they are immune to the problems caused by mass immigration. In fact, they are economically more hurt by it on average. And they were fully aware their personal religion is protected, so it played little to no role!
1
Except he was rabbit left. His coalitions where with left parties as well and the agenda was even extremely left. Many of the EU hellhole policies were put forward by him. More centralization, less democracy, extreme spending, violating of human rights. Exact what you can expect from someone extremely left leaning. And Wilders party is also not right wing, he has more in common with the socialists party (SP). Now you can't call socialists right wing, now can you. O wait, as soon as they really wend of the rails, they relabel it right wing at every opportunity. Left is always lying! The big distinction is that Wilders party is actually democratic in the sense that they want to govern for the people, instead of outside interests. This is also what makes him popular.
1
@sperzieb00n Mass immigration is de facto dehumanization of the existing population that needs to carry the burden. So it already is close to us and exactly why it needs to stop.
1
@9Q9M There is no nitrogen crisis, it is just a pretext to seize land. Stop parroting propaganda. Even the governments own survey documents say it is all looking well. But prior governments did not use that data they used fantasy data, based on a computer model. Not true measurements. Making you the one that is talking BS here.
1
@Khalkara You are on drugs, clearly.
1
@literallyjustgrass You clearly do not understand markets. Not producing food is reducing overal supply, regardless if we export or not. Which leads to instantly impoverishing the most poor in this world. While raising prices elsewhere as well. Benefiting the exact rich business owners you speak about. And what is more, small farmers that sell their land are NOT allowed to set up elsewhere. That is part of the criteria to get "exit money". The policy is literally to starve people elsewhere in the world and to impoverish those at home.
1
@MortlachNL Food is food. Exporting it, does not remove it from overall supply and it does affect pricing.
1
@Jajalaatmaar Yeah, all entrenched powers call new opposition "right wing", building on a life-time of reframing WWII atrocities by the left. He just wend with it and it works, people hate what happened these last decades and being ignored all the time in their wishes. It really works in his favor now, even if on social-economic issues, his choices are usually more of what the classical left would choose. I consider his coalition therefore mildly left overall. Not a bad outcome, could have been so much worse!
1
@okloshbrokla8154 Do you even realize that deportation works both ways? There is an organized effort in co-operation with people smugglers to get all these people in the country in the first place. Next thing you know you are arguing for taking back what was stolen from you just a minute before as stealing. Turn on your brain instead of parroting the sitting criminal powers that control the media and academia.
1
@mormacil That is absolute garbage you wrote. None of the parties is even remotely right wing and what does that even mean according to you anyway. Is the socialist party right wing too, because his social-economic policies are pretty close to theirs? The only thing that sets him apart from the rest is his position on the extreme forms immigration we have these days. Yes, look at the numbers and compare to the past, the extremist policies are from sitting governments that ignore the will of their people and just keep increasing immigration. Wanting to get a grip on it and not destroy the life of the people in the country is not extreme...that is sensible governance! Only a left extremist can call Wilders far-right.
1
@mormacil "Also learn to read, I never called him far right, I said he was radical right. Those aren't the same thing." You silly person, the implication is the same, that happens in languages and how they are used you know. "Are you high? If a party supports private ownership and a capitalist system they're technically by definition right wing." I can see you are a communist and using Marx view of the world in everything, and without any nuance. Not only show in that, but also the definitions you blindly copy-paste, even when they make zero sense. As only full-blown communism in its early form are left and everything else becomes automatically right. Including pretty much all of human history and nature itself! And we are not living in a pure capitalist world, we have SOME ownership and SOME freedoms to make/own what we want, but much of it is dictated by the states Even classical socialist parties, clearly left, operate in this system, without wanting to overturn private ownership. Are they suddenly right wing now? You are hilarious, either a keyboard warrior with no sense of reality or maybe an University student. Either way, someone that never seen the real world outside of his echo chamber.
1