Comments by "TheEVEInspiration" (@TheEVEInspiration) on "Why Black Holes Break The Universe" video.

  1. Revertability seems like a silly popular science trope that has nothing to do with science. Sure, the math does does not care about the direction of time, but reality clearly does. So any argument that demands reversibility (eg. reality conforms to math), is wrong and must be ignored.
    2
  2.  @douglaswilkinson5700  I do not have to, lots of science people argue that according to math things can happen in reverse! Even this video does it. So your attempt at arguing me on this is BS. You demand I doing things 'your way' or else you do not accept it without even listening to the argument I made. Obviously, if I could and would, the next barricade is thrown up, I have known several people that are like this. It's a very cheap 'tactic' to never have to listen to other peoples arguments. I won't fall for it.
    1
  3.  @douglaswilkinson5700  You are totally missing the point, there is no hope for you.
    1
  4.  @douglaswilkinson5700  So he says reality has to conform existing math? If so, then he is not a scientist, but practicing religion.
    1
  5. The argument hat a Black Hole has no surface features because it can be described by just three parameters does not make sense to me. To explain what I mean, lets take temperature. It's a statistical quantity of a volume typically containing a huge amount of detail. So the details are there, but in order to predict behavior we can basically ignore them as they are very unlikely to affect results. How are Black holes any different? Is it willfully mis-reading of established work, just to have more physics to argue about? My point is, where is the proof that the are no "hairs"? Being able to model a black hole with just three parameters is clearly a bogus argument for that. I can see it, and I am not even a scientist!
    1
  6. Revertability seems like a silly popular science trope that has nothing to do with science. Sure, the math does does not care about the direction of time, but reality clearly does. So any argument that demands reversibility (eg. reality conforms to math), is wrong and must be ignored.
    1