Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "FRONTLINE PBS | Official" channel.

  1.  Really Doe  "You're calling people idiots just because they recognize just how deep and far your head is inserted up your rectum." LOL. That's called "question begging fallacy." Look it up. If I offer sound insight that can be used to improve the conversation and even improve the thinking of "adversaries" then that is synergistic discourse. You don't recognize it because he totally lack any confidence in learning anything at all. You have no confidence in your own declarations. If you had any confidence at all in your rants the only effect "name calling" would have on you would be you'd slow down to explain yourself better. You don't think that you can improve at all so you panic and follow all of the other indoctrinated kooks and their hiveminds. You were led to believe that certain types of people can always sort of outperform and that you can't learn from them. You must cling to "social justice" tactics and throw out inane smears in "solidarity" with the other Victicrat kooks. My rhetorical "abuse" actually shows my confidence in your ability to do better. In virtually everyone's ability to learn from conversations of all kinds. Academic trigger theory is abject bullshit. That's what's making you feel this way. None of you put any serious thought in to questioning your own biases. Because you're afraid to. Your minds were closed by your experiences at school. Read the Dunning Kruger studies. These are "psychologists" doing "studies" to show "disparity" in a non-offensive way but based on 2 assumptions: The biggest factor in human disparity is caused by material disparity, including inheritance (DNA and so forth) and that the public school academic doctrines that they went through can't be at fault either.
    1
  2.  Really Doe  "With your Fox News talking points, their signature terminology and repetitive insane rambling of a cult member. " Are you capable at all of running "quality assurance" on your own rants and the actually implications? Fox News signature terminology? LOL. Insane ramblings from me. In theory, sure. The problem that you have is that you can't actually support your claims with any kind of evidence at all. You actually allude only to the Jacobin-Marxist-Progressive cult's form of idiotic theories. Including the theory that you're not able to put together a coherent rebuttal because you're "oppressed" by "capitalism" and "trigger speech" that is part of the "evolution" of the "oppressor" class. You're triggered to throw out these inane and totally ineffective accusations in part because they represent fears about yourself and your own thinking. Your own inadequacies and your fear that you can't grow beyond. That's also why you're to triggered by "Fox News" and Trump. You're triggered by "intersectionalism" or as I call it, Always Blame Capitalism even if you don't know theories. You're afraid that you can't compete and you're afraid that you need a certain political party to defend everything that you depend on materially and psychologically. It's sad. I, on the other hand, am not an "oppressor." My "harsh" (compared to what you're used to in our schools) rhetoric could have a positive effect on you if you'd overcome your fears and cultivated "Resistance" responses. But that's on you and it doesn't matter if you start now or at any time in the future. These are your choices that all individuals must make as the opportunities arise. You have not done much to leverage opportunities granted to you. Maybe give that some thought.
    1
  3.  Really Doe  "You can tone down your unnecessarily long and wordy "explanations" of irrational and your attempts at eloquent composition are as sad as your weak demagoguery." Perhaps more edits are needed? Also, characterizing my rhetoric as "demagoguery" shows that you don't know what the term actually means nor its implications about the audience. Claiming that X is irrational should logically be associated with (allegedly) better examples of what your standards are for "rational." No? Because as it stands you're just throwing out a lot of inane rhetorical chaff in the exact manner I described. You're nominally "objecting" but supporting through example exactly what I have written.
    1
  4.  Really Doe  Why do you bother to write anything at all when all you do is demonstrate poor reading and synthesis skills? You're just crying out as "victim" of, what, exactly?
    1
  5.  Really Doe  Of course I can. Are you capable of communicating on a level that any high school graduate ought to be capable of?
    1
  6.  Really Doe  You don't even understand your own lexicon.
    1
  7. The problem is the objective started over one thing and then morphed in to delusional objectives. Even the supporters of the war could not agree on an end goal or strategy to achieve any clear thing but "progress". They only agreed that they didn't want to "cut and run." That's it. The nation building mission was pure delusion as if occupying Japan and Afghanistan are going to lead more or less the same result. And we didn't even carry out the same kind of programs. The whole thing is insane. You can't build consensus with American Progressives. Their entire worldview is based on smug Utopian arrogance. It's incredibly sad. And if you don't think Progressivism dominates the entire DNC and much (most?) of the Republican Party you could not be more wrong. Progressivism is a cult that dominates all of DC and our academies. It will destroy the free world. It very nearly has already.
    1
  8.  @michelledavis4817  The "government" that bombed Cambodia is the same one that funded Stalin's expansion in to Europe under the "Arsenal of Democracy". It's actually the same statist cult that put together The New Deal "economic" and foreign policy paradigm. It's the one driving everyone but the CCP crazy.
    1
  9.  @serenityb5816  LOL. You guys have no idea what kind of reputation Jack Smith has. He doesn't even believe in Constitutional rule of law. He believes in some kind of mysterious "international rule of law" that is the stuff of mere imagination. International law is the law of treaties. Treaties are only ever enforced on a bilateral basis and therefore the enforcement can not ever be uniform around the globe. At best you hope that sailors follow "International law of the sea" but there's no actual court to appeal to that any nation is bound to listen to unless another sovereign is willing to impose sanctions based on its own policies, not "the law".
    1
  10. It was used to decrypt Nazi military command signals.
    1
  11.  @rhocassiopeiae  He's just another idiot.
    1
  12.  @cocofluff  That's not called thinking. That's reacting.
    1
  13. Wrong. Anyone with normal IQ can understand all of human knowledge, given enough time. And IQ is not an objective measurement, by the way. It's to gauge, subjectively, where students fit in to "socialized" schools and later started to be used in courts for mitigation defense strategies and then sometimes unofficially for "expert witness" qualifications. What a freaking joke.
    1
  14. The other nonsense already arrived starting with fraudulent Impeachments and fake emergencies to pull all of this garbage that keeps getting worse by the day.
    1
  15.  @evanmcdonnal  Explain in "libspeak" what "verbal intelligence" means.
    1
  16. Here's one of the blatant lies still playing in this video. The "loyalty" claim according to Comey is easily reconciled by the following facts: Officers swear loyalty to the Constitution. Comey acted against Trump based on "national security intelligence gathering" paradigms approved by Obama. To the extent that Trump understood this, and he did, Trump also knew that these EOs automatically expired when a new President is sworn in for the simple reason that the sworn President is the head of the Federal Executive Branch and Comey's only choice was to shift his "Constitutional loyalty" to Trump's orders replacing whatever spoken or unspoken permission he got from Obama. And actually, Comey DID carry on investigating Trump after Trump was sworn in. Comey violated his oath to the US Constitution. He chose loyalty over his own ends, justified supposedly by...what? He had no right to run an investigation on President Trump. Period. And even if he had "ironclad" evidence he could at most follow "whistleblower" law and or resign. He kept his job, kept operating in the chain of command while running an illegal "operation" (intelligence gathering?) on the Chief Executive Officer. Had there been any CCP involved in this scheme Comey could have been charged with Treason. And we don't know if the CCP was dovetailing its own intelligence gathering on Comey's illegal Keystone Kops routine. It's unbelievable that PBS is this partisan and spreading such ignorance. Even in its "premier investigative yada yada yada..."
    1
  17.  @StellarFella  LOL. Which dictator are you referring to? FDR died in 1945. The other Democratic Party Presidents are pikers compared to FDR. There is no single autocrat to replace FDR. He left behind a cult of bureaucrats and a part that only knows how to keep making everything in DC bigger.
    1
  18.  @frankG335  The thing is that Comey is a law school graduate that doesn't even know how the Constitution actually operates.
    1
  19.  @CarltonSmith45  I promise you that this is nothing more than "computer" systems and algorithms that have permission to write their own rules but within a known framework. It's like bragging that a customer service database "learns" as you add more customer info and then give it "permission" to modify it's own routines based on the growing data and the rules preprogrammed. Many software projects were started by massive teams and then taken over by people that can never meet the original authors. These secondary programmers start to believe the hype a bit or use the language that they think makes them look like "gurus" (it's hard to tell what they really think) and promote a "mystical" view about what is really behind these paradigmatic claims. The goal of "AI" in machine logic is to deceive. Where the deception starts and ends really depends on who explains it and how they understand it. It's still human programmed, non-sentient machinery. If "national defense" lingo, "signals intelligence" represents communications that are intercepted and if a replacement message is put in place with the aid of a computer program, that is "synthesizing" artificially the intelligence that you intercepted. It's not "artificial sentience." It's fraudulent intelligence that can "imitate" human communications from the same source that sent the original but with hopefully different outcomes. Having machines play chess is just gaming. Nothing more. It shows off the power of the machine, not sentience.
    1
  20.  Jessica Robinson  LOL. The messianic, expansionist power is Iran.
    1
  21.  @patrickharrison4421  I'm sure there's more to the story. I'm glad you're alive and well. I don't trust anyone without evidence.
    1
  22.  Alvino A  So? That's a caveat doctrine, not "wisdom" or something like that. Claims are claims. That's it. If you want to build "knowledge" you have to learn how to vet and organize knowledge claims. It's a process. We can't just "choose to agree" that Napoleon never existed, as one example. We can comment on various things and that can affect "pop history" just as it affects popular "science" notions. Nonetheless, knowledge claims can be vetted over time and our understanding of what happened in the past becomes slightly clearer in the process. But few can even discern or control their own biases so it seems like a lost cause, I guess. I blame "socialized" schools. Our prediction models in "rocket science" and physics continue to get better but our ability predict the future of man gets worse. Nobody understands anything about human behavior. They all seem to want to be identified as "master expositor" rather than figuring out some truly rational prediction paradigms. Noam Chomsky is some kind of "social justice" guru and a total idiot. Most of the other "thought leaders" are even worse.
    1
  23.  @SG-hf8pj  What nihilistic idiocy are you spouting? Today's schools are "anti progressive" in that they teach nihilistic bullshit like you're spouting all framed on the assumption that "community truth" is the only "truth" that can exist. IOW, there's no such thing as objective "truth" other than what we all agree that we can observe, and what we infer from that observation is also subject to "community truth." That is utter bullshit. We don't teach critical thinking. We teach "critical theories" all premised on the assumption that "critical thinking" is "racist" in the sense that critical thinking leads to "unmanageable disparity" or "Social Darwinism." In order to have Progressive "managed Social Darwinism" the plebs must be taught all of the "critical theories" with "racist" ideas that lead to "unmanaged disparity." It's doctrinaire Progressivism minus critical thinking. IOW, it's inherently regressive and anti-scientific. I don't need to appeal to my history or training to support what I wrote. Since you seem to think that it does I'll mention that I have a background in US Constitutional law, history (studying the history of English common law and British monarchy), computer sciences, electronics, material and biological sciences and the nexuses such that I can advise "medical" enterprises in order to obtain credentials to sell products in the USA and around the world) and manage risks. I must liaise between all of the various "experts" across "world cultures" AND "expert" cultures. It doesn't take a genius to do that. It takes a proper fundamental education and careful progressive, relevant experience. Teaching about culture and critical thinking are not the same thing. Anyone can be taught critical thinking. Critical thinking should be the seed of all teaching doctrines in any "democratized" academy. It's not. European philosophers (with the help of crazed, idiotic lawyers and elected officials as allies) killed it in Western academies when they "socialized" the schools.
    1
  24.  @SG-hf8pj  You're a total idiot. Full stop. You don't have the cognitive skills nor the appropriate humility to even formulate relevant questions. Instead you fill in your own deluded worldview and imagine yourself as having superior understanding while at the same time knowing that you are just another ignorant victim of socialized schools. You aided my argument while attempting to dismiss it. How sad. You do this because you don't even imagine that you could have learned more with access to better schools and much better teachers. Buzzwords. My God. What a pathetic response.
    1
  25.  @SG-hf8pj  Moron, Formulate an intelligent question. Stop lying.
    1
  26.  Alvino A  That's not what fact means. The original assertion was unqualified. Categorical. You then try to support it with a "critique" of "people" knowing you can always find examples of flawed people and flawed claims that you will continue to imply is "proof" of your categorical assertions. Rather than saying "history is agreed upon lies" you should start off by saying that people can be idiots. That says nothing about 'history" except that "history" is a product of humanity.Quality varies wildly. But it's a fact that claims can be vetted and therefore most serious historians and their claims can be rated and the historical claims that survive vetting can rarely be described as "agreed upon lies" by anyone but hypocritical lying revisionists. It's just not that easy to lie while making "big history" claims. It's usually "POV history" like "A People's History" or whatever. And even they are not lying so much as promoting idiotic worldviews. Most of what you find in "the history section" of any US library is based on verifiable records but also known POV. Not lies at all. The fact is that people like Napoleon like to propagate partisan lies to "replace" inconvenient facts about themselves.
    1
  27.  @StellarFella  Is FDR a hero or a villain according to you and your cult?
    1
  28.  @jamesrichardson3322  Not exactly. The elitist slavers pivoted to controlling DC Commanding Heights. You think they weren't aware of Marxist theories? Of course they were. They understood the need for "Soviets" to guide "labor." They're neo-Soviets trying to take power under "dictatorship of the proletariat" and some are loyal to DC Democrats as "vanguard party" while others are just waiting for End of History Communism when all the wealth is "shared fairly" whether by Pelosi, Biden, Xi, Kamala, they don't care. The whole "southern neoconfederacy" meme is stupid. Because there are a select few, I assume, that think they can just ignore the big picture and harken back to the way things were. That's not a dominant theme in any significant movement of today. You're seriously deluded if you think so. You listen to too many idiotic stories from academics that feed you false binaries of "good politics" and "bad politics". Most "Humanities" academics are morons. That's why they can't get work where they're held accountable for testable results.
    1
  29.  @jamesrichardson3322  You're right that I've never met anyone quite like that.
    1
  30.  @timburk9079  Did steel bladed shovels "replace jobs" or lead to more work? Or both? How about steam engines?
    1
  31.  @16nowhereman  When were humans not lazy?
    1
  32. POTUS doesn't have to explain himself to his advisors. Bolton got triggered. Just like so many other self-hating Progressives. Progressivism is premised on fear of "Social Darwinism." It's pretty amazing.
    1
  33.  @twatts1523  100% correct. They're totally suspicious of everything the Democrat Party run nanny state tells them to "investigate". They get this nonsense directly from the parasitic statists that are spreading absurd agitation propaganda. DC has been pitiful since FDR and the Democratic Party in the US has been pitiful and I would even say evil from the moment of its inception.
    1
  34.  @StellarFella  Why all of the authoritative emotionalism? The most tyrannical Presidents are regarded as heroes to this day. Trump was one of the most liberal Presidents in the nation's history. You guys just don't know what the words mean and don't understand what the choices are. If you want to understand the Nazi imagery and what should scare you then you need to read Three New Deals. Political/economic systems are not understand merely by the Utopian promises that they make. Worse is to take their stupid agitation propaganda and go on screed about "tyrannical" bogey men. Napoleon fought for the French Jacobin regime. He rose to power is a leftist. He was the first tyrannical imperialist leftist, but not the last. The latest is Xi. The US only had 2 liberal Democratic Party Presidents. Truman and JFK. Everything you think you know about these topics is utter nonsense. Of course you think that stupid book is something to spread because of your feelings only.
    1
  35.  @StellarFella  I already listed a blatant lie in this video pertaining to the Comey "Personal loyalty to Trump" claim. Trump was the sworn President at that time and Comey was running an illegal operation against Trump based on permission from the previous President and was therefore violating his Constitutional oath. You wouldn't know the truth if it smacked you in the comments sections.
    1
  36.  @nancy8145  You'll find much more "misinformation" on PBS than you will on Fox News. But Frontline sets the serious mood and stuff. So truthy. LOL. Why do you people rely so much on straw men? It falls under "pound the table" when you have no facts to support your stories.
    1
  37.  @RegWho  Your claim is illogical. IOW, asinine. It is literally people reading from coordinated talking points to somehow defend Comey and others as "truth tellers" while smearing them for any association with "Republicanism" as the PBS (state funded media) is expected to do. You don't even know what the relevant facts are. You apparently think it's a "cool story" that supports what you're inculcated to also support with your own silly stories.
    1
  38.  @TheDrewker  My goodness. You kooks are apparently beyond hope. Don't you understand what Freudian projection is? It's a caveat doctrine. And you missed the lesson.
    1
  39.  @TheDrewker  What you wrote is insane.
    1
  40.  @TheDrewker  You're a Gaslit moron. That's why you're so "exasperated" in ways that you can't even begin to explain. You know that you're an ignoramus and yet you "identify" as (or with) Progressive elitist (ignoramuses).
    1
  41.  @TheDrewker  You're a deranged liar. Quote Bannon if you want to make some kind of rational point about what you claim he said or did. You effing Gaslit lunatic.
    1
  42.  KALDOUT WNZ  LOL. You don't understand his values. The first divide is between Progressive elitists and everyone else. Their (Progressive) base doesn't get it. Neither do you. This idiot in the video is a Progressive elitist. He "identifies as Conservative" or "Republican" or whatever but that doesn't even come close to conveying what he actually believes.
    1
  43.  @Operafreak9  I'm sorry, but that's idiotic. Democrats created fascism before the Italian fascists coined the term. They emulated the KKK and the elitist "labor" movement. And they were reacting immediately to the threat of the Soviets (Progressive's allies) as Lenin pivoted from "Revolutionary Communism" to his NEP. The Fascists and Nazis interpreted this according to their own national interests. Just as "globalist" Lenin created post-revolutionary Marxist socialism with his NEP. The fascists simply denied the international workers' movement as "vanguard." Just like Lenin. A Republican that behaves like a fascist is called a RINO. Because they actually take their cues from fascist Democrats. Every thinking person can see that FDR only opposed "fascism" to help save "Communism." Good thing he finally died and Truman woke up soon enough to put the brakes on some of it.
    1
  44.  @Operafreak9  Learn what fascism is.
    1
  45. Spirit of the founders gleaned from what, exactly? "Democracy" isn't a mystical thing. "Reasonable man" standards don't require Special Brain Trust elites to parse. It's just unbelievable how much "misinformation" we have now propagated and protected as "clarity" and "defense of Democratic Norms" and gibberish like that. The only thing Pence was tasked with was allowing Senators to present the case for investigating the election fraud accusations considering that "New Normal" (like drop boxes and using "COVID" to chase away lawful observers) was even more mysterious than explaining how "antiracists" can't be audited. Or some BS like that. And how is it that all of the pundits have ignored the most credible "liberals" of all like Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley? How does ANY of this represent "democracy" in any sense? It's all circular logic and gibberish.
    1
  46.  @christianschwalbach7561  You should move to China and face your accusers there. Then when you're convicted we'll all laugh at you.
    1
  47.  @matthewlvh  LOL. It's not a lie. Do you know what "socialism" means? He certainly does want to destroy "status quo hegemony" of "the patriarchy." His philosophies and government doctrines come from neo-Marxism. This is regarded by all sentient thinkers as "socialism" unless you're a full blown pseudo-scientific lunatic that thinks Critical Theory is "Settled Science." Care to try again? Calling people "liars" for offering intelligent criticism is, well, it's insanely ignorant.
    1
  48.  @kristinaburnett-fo9sp  The problem is that the criminals have been regularly threatening to "pack SCOTUS" and the Federal Judiciary is terrified of accepting a Civilian RICO petition. Maybe now that we have the Durham Special Counsel reports and House Committee reports all pertaining to the same criminal racketeers someone like Trump or his family members can sue for Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law. At the time Obama blessed the "intelligence" operation against candidate Trump, they all had plenty to hide. The Clintons' CGI treasonous grifting scheme is much worse than the Biden wing of the DC crime families. Biden's biggest mistake is letting his crackhead son take over as bag man for Beau.
    1
  49.  @sunnyplace1759  Sorry to inform you that you're a dangerous ignoramus. Perhaps a move to China would help you understand things better in the USA or maybe you'll become a True Believer and live out the Woke Communist dream.
    1
  50. I agree that not all Democrats are evil. But once elected it's hard to understand why anyone would stay with the party once they see how it actually operates. Maybe in some States (certainly not in California) I can understand. All Democrats in DC are evil. Some are evil equivocators and the others are straight up, blatantly "liberal" evildoers who "liberate the demos" from phantasms of the party's creation. They still blame Republicans for losing their slaves and "labor struggles". And so called "Oligarchy" which means any powerful organization that goes against their zero-sum economics schemes (otherwise read "Critical Theory Marxism" for those that know the issues). Republicans are "monsters" and "Nazis" because these pathetic ignoramuses think that Capitalism is wage slavery and the "root cause" of all "Disparity" aka "Inequity". They dance around the specifics because Marx's labor value theory is a joke, disproven by all of history, and his "land reform" expectations only made sense in monarchies that did not allow equal access to own land. "Inheritance" was "wrong" because the material wealth had originally been granted by the monarch, in all of his examples. How does any of that apply to the USA? It doesn't. Even Stalin admitted that the US would never revolt as Marx had expected of "International Workers". But they still play with this BS in every academy from K-12 and every college they can coerce and take over. Critical Theory is not critical thinking. Changing labels and playing word game doesn't mean you're not relying on Marxist dogmas for the implied "value system" that underlies it all.
    1