Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "In the Age of AI (full documentary) | FRONTLINE" video.

@somnathbanerjee2057 AI has no will to replace humans. That's because AI has no will. Full stop. It has no selfish interests. It has programs and rules that humans set for it.
3
@aaronm8143 Move to Texas and start your own business.
3
@tjk9263 That's weird because her allies are always hyping "population bomb" control. They're not against "Climate Change." They're against anyone that opposes their paranoid cult.
2
It's just a Turing machine being played with by a bunch of demagogues. Artificial intelligence would be better described as imitation intelligence. The goal is to imitate, not replace humans in any meaningful sense. The idea was to use the Turing decryption machines to then issue British and US contrived orders down the command chain after disrupting the original instructions in a way that the recipients would believe that whatever sense of character the recipients "read between the lines" that the imitation instructions would be believable. Conceptually, it's the same as having someone like Amazon or Apple answering your questions but trying to achieve a standard not just that you knowingly accept this as a replacement but that you actually believe it comes from an authorized human source. All of this other hyperbole just converses and scares people. The villains are not the machines. The villains are the ones deceiving you about the machines, the threat, and what should be done about this alleged threat. The threat is that "the demos" don't know who is manipulating them. And "algorithms" give organizations "plausible deniability" when they're programmed to distract you from obvious conflicts of interests. "No, it's Science. It was a mistake. We never could have known our 'AI' would help the CCP."
2
Target, not product. Target.
2
@Francis Hubert Don't conflate AI with "robots." "The problem is, humans doing jobs nowadays usually don't have a stake in the company. " Why is that? And whatever happened to Antitrust law?
2
@ghg789987 Right. Except that our schools make it seem like the opposite is happening. And it becomes self-fulfilling prophecy.
2
@Third_eyee They teach Critical Theory and claim it is Scientific Critical Thinking.
2
It was used to decrypt Nazi military command signals.
1
@rhocassiopeiae He's just another idiot.
1
Wrong. Anyone with normal IQ can understand all of human knowledge, given enough time. And IQ is not an objective measurement, by the way. It's to gauge, subjectively, where students fit in to "socialized" schools and later started to be used in courts for mitigation defense strategies and then sometimes unofficially for "expert witness" qualifications. What a freaking joke.
1
@CarltonSmith45 I promise you that this is nothing more than "computer" systems and algorithms that have permission to write their own rules but within a known framework. It's like bragging that a customer service database "learns" as you add more customer info and then give it "permission" to modify it's own routines based on the growing data and the rules preprogrammed. Many software projects were started by massive teams and then taken over by people that can never meet the original authors. These secondary programmers start to believe the hype a bit or use the language that they think makes them look like "gurus" (it's hard to tell what they really think) and promote a "mystical" view about what is really behind these paradigmatic claims. The goal of "AI" in machine logic is to deceive. Where the deception starts and ends really depends on who explains it and how they understand it. It's still human programmed, non-sentient machinery. If "national defense" lingo, "signals intelligence" represents communications that are intercepted and if a replacement message is put in place with the aid of a computer program, that is "synthesizing" artificially the intelligence that you intercepted. It's not "artificial sentience." It's fraudulent intelligence that can "imitate" human communications from the same source that sent the original but with hopefully different outcomes. Having machines play chess is just gaming. Nothing more. It shows off the power of the machine, not sentience.
1
@timburk9079 Did steel bladed shovels "replace jobs" or lead to more work? Or both? How about steam engines?
1
@16nowhereman When were humans not lazy?
1
Nope. Those are stupid fables. However, the fables do create a lot of murderous idiots that propose to solve this phantom problem.
1
They're both just euphemisms.
1
Raymond Babcock Orphanages?
1