Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "The Choice 2020: John Bolton (interview) | FRONTLINE" video.

@David_Lloyd-Jones You people are crazy.
3
Trump is not an autocrat. You people are crazy. And you never denounce the actual autocrats, like FDR.
3
@patrickharrison4421 Bolton tried to kill you. Sure. Because of Capitalism and Patriarchy. Right?
3
@David_Lloyd-Jones Your delusional analogies draw from historical facts. Idiot. You are insane. You can't demonstrate in any way at all that you can distinguish between fact and delusion. You defended your delusions as analysis. Lol. That's not going to do it.
2
@David_Lloyd-Jones More idiocy. You've got an endless supply, apparently.
2
@David_Lloyd-Jones And you still can't tell fact from fiction nor respond intelligently about actual controversies being discussed. Your rhetoric is inherently delusional and regressive. Trump never threatened to pack SCOTUS but an autocrat like FDR would and did. See, that's how serious people support their verdicts and analogies. You rant from your triggered mind and project your own parasitic value system on to targets identified by your cult.
2
@patrickharrison4421 The whole reason for the US Constitution's divided government (vertically and horizontally) paradigm is that we're not supposed to blindly trust anyone with government power. We're supposed to judge their actions carefully, as we would expect to be judged. Our schools teach radically different theories, I'm afraid.
2
@patrickharrison4421 Stay healthy and look after your immune system and cardio-pulmonary health. The worst you'll have to fear from that particular SARS virus is headaches and a mild fever. The same advice applies to living through cancer treatments. Indoor or outdoor cycling and a healthy diet will take care of most of what you need.
2
@TPerm-hj4sf Better to let the Chinese Communists "peacefully" sweep away every other nation's sovereignty.
2
The "pandemic" strategy is to allow State governors to deal with domestic management while Trump marshals development of the vaccine and any emerging "best practices" as they evolve. Why do you hate science?
2
@katomiler843 Listen, idiot, learn what scare quotes are. According to pretty much every theory on human philosophy, everyone instinctively regards their own views as "rational." The problem today is that there's an academic cult (the same one that dominates the unions and interferes with "Our Democracy" as "Resistance") that validates certain kinds of circular logic as "rational" AKA "Realism." By my (trigger warning! scare quotes ahead!!!) "typing" I alluded to this contradiction where many people study International Relations and "Realpolitik" as "Realism" and then conflate that with "studies" of individuals. Like "stereotyping" Trump as "authoritarian." It's insane. It's institutionalized insanity. Bolton is not a doctrinaire Progressive. But he's clearly triggered by the idiotic "Social Darwinism" theories.
2
@David_Lloyd-Jones Inaccurate? What you wrote is straight up insane. You can't properly parse fact from fiction. You're completely deluded and beyond correction at this time. You are unskilled and unaware.
1
@David_Lloyd-Jones Moron, I already answered your questions. You obviously can't read or write properly.
1
@brentjamesonparker What an idiotic, illogical question. Pretty ironic. Too bad you can't rectify your own fallacious thinking before chiming in.
1
@brentjamesonparker Let me explain something to you. People that go around like you making "labeling" arguments, that never come up with any kind of logical explanation to support the label "accusation" are just about as illogical as it gets. It almost doesn't even matter what you think "straw man" means. It's pretty obvious that you don't know what "straw man fallacy" means. A straw man, logically, is a trope or a model (analytical paradigm) or whatever. You seem to think that with your silly 5 word accusation that you've said something meaningful. What you've telegraphed is that you have no hope of following the conversations without first looking at your own "uncertainty theories" - or more bluntly - your own areas of ignorance. You don't even realize that by your own behavior you're providing an example of many of the problems I've complained about right here. You're triggered by your cult to defend perceived "community interests" (that's a rough translation from Gramsci's Prison Notebooks). That's the only thing anyone can conclude by your contribution here. Another way of putting it is that you're "virtue signaling" to likeminded people. If you want to cry out illogically "straw man something something" over and over again, carry on. That's what you and your cult like to do when you're not carrying bad "social justice" signage to the riots and throwing Molotov cocktails. Identifying you as affected by a cult is not a fallacious "straw man" argument. I'm pointing out the implications of your inane rhetoric. You're perfectly free to show contradictory evidence but choose not to. How about that.
1
@brentjamesonparker Genius.
1
Really Doe You poor deluded thing.
1
@OccultDemonCassette Another delusional lunatic rant. SNAFU
1
Really Doe Moron, I doubt that you can read or reason properly but for the sake of those that can, I already wrote that FDR fits more than any other US President based on historical facts. I'm not the one with a fetish of arguing by labeling. The New Deal and his treatment of Congress, SCOTUS, and his willingness to run for 4 terms, unlike any other US President in history, demonstrates that FDR saw himself as a kind of unique political messiah that was totally closed minded about any opposition to his "New Deal" socialism and approach to foreign policy. You morons have no idea what he was about. Apparently you don't even know what "autocrat" actually means. Did you study any history at all? Do you not ever consider the relevant facts pertaining to your kooky rants? Did it ever occur to you that FDR's relationship with Stalin was more valued than his relationship with the British because FDR was a crazed neo-Marxist Progressive that thought the Communists and their command economy ideas (as in New Deal) were the way of the future for all of the world? Serious scholars that are not afraid to look at history from an unbiased frame can see that FDR had the same beliefs as the Marxists other than his own Christian beliefs and that the USA was regarded as "exceptional" in that it would not need to go through a bloody revolution to achieve the Marxist prophecies for "progress" and so forth. When neo-Marxists denounce "Communism" they're only denouncing their rivals and/or the need for revolution. If you believe in Marx's historical materialism and "progress" you also believe in Communism. You just don't know what he labels mean. As far as Trump as "autocrat" this is literally propagated by neo-Marxist academic lunatics that "make the case" by using "signaling" and "stereo typing" profiling techniques. At best these critiques belong in a conversation about perceptions and leadership styles and how propagation by enemies can spin. But soon you see that they are the ones that regard themselves as "victims" and therefore "enemies" of an elected President. Not just that they're triggered by his speech but that they can't recognize their own childish reactions. As if they really think they can connect him with "autocrats." They obviously don't even understand the meaning behind his rhetoric. What it shows is that the academic class of paid pontificators can make careers out of teaching "criticism" to students and nobody will really see just what a crazed cult they've created over time. John Bolton's fear of Trump is based on his view of "democracy." He's a very good attorney. He's done a good job playing his assigned roles in the past. Kooks don't understand how that works. With Trump, Bolton didn't actually disagree with Trump's policies. He was triggered by his manners that Bolton instinctively profiled like a Progressive kook. Because although he's not a doctrinaire Progressive, he spends so much time with them that some of the Progressive cultural "community sense" has affected his thinking. He fears Trump because he's afraid that, generally speaking, Progressives are right about "the demos" that they regard as idiots. That they are "triggered" and that "capitalists" like Trump only care about profit. It doesn't mean Bolton is afraid of these policy changes. Bolton knows that Communists are far more dangerous. What's amazing to me is that Bolton thinks Trump is in another class from, say, the Bush family. And he is but only in a very superficial sense. The Bush family has raised their children as "conservative Progressives" in that they believe in the Progressive worldview but play a kind of Randian Libertarian role as "conservers of patriotism and stuff" in the US. Progressives think that you're an idiot. Unlike me, they don't blame their own academic doctrines and "public education" establishment. They blame Darwinism. They don't expect students to be able to catch up once they fall behind (or worse, when they show up as "low IQ" from the start). They expect a wide diversity in results from K-12 and try to create "egalitarian learning" so that the students don't notice this wide disparity (that they are partially responsible for). Apparently you've never read and contemplated Orwell's Animal Farm.
1
Really Doe
1
Really Doe "You're calling people idiots just because they recognize just how deep and far your head is inserted up your rectum." LOL. That's called "question begging fallacy." Look it up. If I offer sound insight that can be used to improve the conversation and even improve the thinking of "adversaries" then that is synergistic discourse. You don't recognize it because he totally lack any confidence in learning anything at all. You have no confidence in your own declarations. If you had any confidence at all in your rants the only effect "name calling" would have on you would be you'd slow down to explain yourself better. You don't think that you can improve at all so you panic and follow all of the other indoctrinated kooks and their hiveminds. You were led to believe that certain types of people can always sort of outperform and that you can't learn from them. You must cling to "social justice" tactics and throw out inane smears in "solidarity" with the other Victicrat kooks. My rhetorical "abuse" actually shows my confidence in your ability to do better. In virtually everyone's ability to learn from conversations of all kinds. Academic trigger theory is abject bullshit. That's what's making you feel this way. None of you put any serious thought in to questioning your own biases. Because you're afraid to. Your minds were closed by your experiences at school. Read the Dunning Kruger studies. These are "psychologists" doing "studies" to show "disparity" in a non-offensive way but based on 2 assumptions: The biggest factor in human disparity is caused by material disparity, including inheritance (DNA and so forth) and that the public school academic doctrines that they went through can't be at fault either.
1
Really Doe "With your Fox News talking points, their signature terminology and repetitive insane rambling of a cult member. " Are you capable at all of running "quality assurance" on your own rants and the actually implications? Fox News signature terminology? LOL. Insane ramblings from me. In theory, sure. The problem that you have is that you can't actually support your claims with any kind of evidence at all. You actually allude only to the Jacobin-Marxist-Progressive cult's form of idiotic theories. Including the theory that you're not able to put together a coherent rebuttal because you're "oppressed" by "capitalism" and "trigger speech" that is part of the "evolution" of the "oppressor" class. You're triggered to throw out these inane and totally ineffective accusations in part because they represent fears about yourself and your own thinking. Your own inadequacies and your fear that you can't grow beyond. That's also why you're to triggered by "Fox News" and Trump. You're triggered by "intersectionalism" or as I call it, Always Blame Capitalism even if you don't know theories. You're afraid that you can't compete and you're afraid that you need a certain political party to defend everything that you depend on materially and psychologically. It's sad. I, on the other hand, am not an "oppressor." My "harsh" (compared to what you're used to in our schools) rhetoric could have a positive effect on you if you'd overcome your fears and cultivated "Resistance" responses. But that's on you and it doesn't matter if you start now or at any time in the future. These are your choices that all individuals must make as the opportunities arise. You have not done much to leverage opportunities granted to you. Maybe give that some thought.
1
Really Doe "You can tone down your unnecessarily long and wordy "explanations" of irrational and your attempts at eloquent composition are as sad as your weak demagoguery." Perhaps more edits are needed? Also, characterizing my rhetoric as "demagoguery" shows that you don't know what the term actually means nor its implications about the audience. Claiming that X is irrational should logically be associated with (allegedly) better examples of what your standards are for "rational." No? Because as it stands you're just throwing out a lot of inane rhetorical chaff in the exact manner I described. You're nominally "objecting" but supporting through example exactly what I have written.
1
Really Doe Why do you bother to write anything at all when all you do is demonstrate poor reading and synthesis skills? You're just crying out as "victim" of, what, exactly?
1
Really Doe Of course I can. Are you capable of communicating on a level that any high school graduate ought to be capable of?
1
Really Doe You don't even understand your own lexicon.
1
@evanmcdonnal Explain in "libspeak" what "verbal intelligence" means.
1
Jessica Robinson LOL. The messianic, expansionist power is Iran.
1
@patrickharrison4421 I'm sure there's more to the story. I'm glad you're alive and well. I don't trust anyone without evidence.
1
POTUS doesn't have to explain himself to his advisors. Bolton got triggered. Just like so many other self-hating Progressives. Progressivism is premised on fear of "Social Darwinism." It's pretty amazing.
1
@katomiler843 That has nothing to do with any controversy. I don't claim that he's misrepresenting anything that was said. I am laughing at how triggered he is by the process. His commentary is "rational" irrationality. He's applying "Realpolitik" thinking to analysis of an individual. That's idiotic. Truly. John Bolton is a brilliant lawyer in many ways but he doesn't recognize when he's out of his depth. He was in a position of trust and then used that to "oversee" a "psych profile" study of his boss. That's crazy, actually. He had no duty to do so, and he clearly had no objective cognitive skills to do so either. Therefore he didn't even have any way to start a rational enquiry of the kinds of "controversies" he now thinks he can speak about. His demagogic "psych profile" gibberish is deranged insanity. Its the kind of bullshit that evolves in cults when they live with too much power that isn't properly checked.
1