Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Triggernometry" channel.

  1. Leftism came from Jacobin France and also birthed Napoleon and the first "socialists" all in the same movement. I'm leaving out the BLM, I mean, "anarchists" taht were their first ANTIFA style shock troops. Anarchists that want to live without government usually go and find a place to live free. They don't go in to the capital city and destroy everything. But anyway, these leftists are now also pseudoscientific Marxists. The Jacobins and Marxists had some legitimate grievances in Europe in accordance with how many "disenfranchised" people there were without any hope of land or acquiring their own income to buy their own food. They generally lived in the style we call "Feudalism" as peasants. In Germany, when Marx wrote his BS, the situation was the same but Marx thought that the industrial revolution would make the "Capitalists" their permanent rulers and that once the workers were replaced by steam engines and other fantastic machines that the workers would be left to die. Just like Marxists actually did later. But anyway, their grievances never had any legitimacy in lands where people could live peacefully and harvest their own food. If they're allowed to work their own land and keep most of it after paying a "tribute" (portion of the production) even this destroys Marxist philosophy, not to mention the raving lunatics known as Jacobins (named after their first meeting spot) and "leftists" as they also called themselves a bit later in the French Revolution. So, Rob Schneider is absolutely correct. They philosophically left the country a long time ago. They deliberately reinterpret the Bill of Rights and redefine what "rights" and "justice" and "equity" mean.
    1
  2. Because Diddy's parties are all about destroying the nuclear family and the root-level nuclear family is the building block of "Capitalism". As soon as a mother and father have their first child (unless they kill it) the father has become and evil, oppressive Capitalist and the dependents are his slaves. It's right there in the Communist Manifesto. If it's in the Communist Manifesto we can't call them hypocrites if they are consistent in their Communist ideology. The jokes that offend them are called "Punching Down". Any joke that makes them feel foolish in their ideology is Punching Down. These are all serious things to Marxist psychopaths.
    1
  3. True liberals must understand the the left-right spectrum is a Marxist construct. There's no such thing as "political right" unless we cede to the idea that opposition to Marxism is "extreme right". There is no "right wing authoritarianism" unless you qualify it by calling it right wing Marxism. Like Mussolini and Hitler. Marxists consider those two socialists that agreed with Marx on everything but "international solidarity" across the "working class". IOW, the pure Marxists insist that the "Proletariat" must all stick together globally. Hitler did not like the idea that his "German Folk" would submit to Lenin's "Vanguard Party" claim and obviously Stalin was even worse. If you talk about "right wing authoritarianism" you are falling in to the trap of validating their worldview and their dogmatic ability to paint all critics of Communism as inherently authoritarian. Notice there is no such thing as a Moderate Marxist. There are Fabians, but not moderates. There are only two choices in the left right spectrum and the supposed nuance is about how "political" you are. The ideology itself is binary. So the Democrats, now that they've purged all of their KKK members in favor of racist Progressives, refer to low energy members of their party as "moderate" and the extremists are painted as "activists". Get it? They require ideological purity but use explanations that seem to be nuanced but really are not. Kammy, a dogmatic Communist, is painted as a moderate because she's (rhetorically) a flip-floppy hypocrite that doesn't rant every day like AOC and her little Congressional clique.
    1