Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "The View Fact Checks Rogan-Trump Interview But Gets It WRONG." video.

@bilson7523 Nobody can say it wasn't her personally. She's one of the nastiest politicians to ever appear on television. And as FLOTUS she was even worse. People think Kamala is the worst but Hillary was, on a personal level, even more deranged and full of bitter hatred. Kammy is catching up fast though. Thank God the Senator Kamala thing was as short lived as Hillary's stint doing the same thing. But then we had to put up with 4 years of "Madame Secretary Hillary". Holy fark. Imagine Kammy doing that for Biden. Thank God that chapter of history is in the past.
3
Ted Cruz and John McCain went to college as ordinary US students but Obama applied as a Kenyan student. Now, he can have dual Citizenship by being born in the US to one or more foreign parents. But the issue is that people were disputing what "natural born" means but more important than that is that his declared father was a Kenyan socialist. So debating the details of his ancestry is fair game as part of candidate vetting. Obama was the first Red Diaper Baby and Kamala would have been the second RDB President. Hillary is the most dogmatic Marxist but her parents were not Marxists.
1
@jenns1483 The BC he published on the White House web site was is referred to in legal terms as a facsimile. It's not valid as a standalone document. What I mean is that there used to be an early type of proprietary Optical Character Recognition that was used to save space over paper records. But digital compression technologies were so simple at that time that what it did was scan the document and only save parts needed to reproduce it again with algorithms rather than reproducing a file the way an ordinary digital file would. That means there was no pixel to pixel data. It scanned and interpreted fonts and then recorded the text in place of the image. The only time it saved some part of the file as an image is when it failed to "recognize" the typeface and could not record the fonts. Obama's had fragments of images and then standard fonts to fill in the rest of the data as recorded in the database. This is easy to fake because, well, that is exactly how people have always faked documents. IOW, it's very similar to "photoshop" when there were no digital tools, just film, paper and darkrooms. And glue. So, the document he posted can't be submitted in court alone but as part of a "certificate" where some official signs his "certainty" that this facsimile "certainly" matches the official records in terms of data records even though it's not a true reproduction of the original document. In that sense, it was "fake" in no uncertain terms. That was another point in history when a Democrat can "certify" anything that they want ad you can no longer ask any questions about it. Certify is now a magic word in their circles and the whole world has become stupider than ever. Facsimile, they will now tell you, means exact copy. But a facsimile is supposed to contain the exact content in a similar format to the original. A photocopy is not a facsimile. You used to her phrases like "reasonable facsimile" meaning that the opinion was offered taht it truly represents the facts even if not an exact copy in terms of style or whatever. But as I explained, these OCR facsimiles are stored and printed in the exact same way that anyone can copy to make a fake. So a court won't accept these OCR reproductions without it being certified and the judge can reject that as well. These things are all so easy to fake. And BTW, I have all of my original documents from my Birth Certificate, my original Social Security Card and expired Passports and IDs because it just doesn't take that much effort to keep them together and secure when you might need them. Barack didn't have his original Birth Certificate and that says something about his background. I'm not saying it's disqualifying but vetting people is about seeing how they account for things. When someone is always making excuses and then his team calls critics "racist" instead of trying to explain what he learned in his life about running things...these people rarely make good executives and rarely are people that can be trusted with important assets. Like any job that requires security clearances of insurance of losses when you effe up something...Obama seems like an OK guy and should have taken his shot as a lawyer in the private sector or stayed in the Senate. Not too many people are really cut out for running an executive office. And US President? They should all be strenuously vetted but Democratic Party candidates are never properly vetted.
1