Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "The Daily Signal" channel.

He's a great analyst and consultant, not a campaign manager.
14
@evalramman7502 What I think is hilarious is that originally Sowell didn't trust Trump but what happened in that in execution Trump followed Milton Freidman's economic doctrines as applied to the conditions of today. Including "shock doctrine" as needed. Sowell realized that within a year or two and says so pretty regularly even though he doesn't mention Freidman by name when talking about Trump.
7
@nonyab3843 Because it hurt your feelings. And perhaps you don't even understand that either.
5
@rgray3173 That sounds like Freudian projection.
4
@jackharle1251 Don't forget to vote for Kammy.
3
@nonyab3843 Critical thinking skills were employed to come up with something like "Vance is the wrong choice"? How about showing your work instead of tossing out meaningless terms that you don't seem to understand. And that is the topic: Basically, your meaningless gibberish and defensive (and pompous) tropes in response. And if you had "critical thinking skills" you would have read my response as indicating that anyone can just blurt out X is right and Y is wrong without any supporting "critical thinking" as part of your assertion. Freud would have really enjoyed examining you.
3
@nonyab3843 How old are you?
3
@nonyab3843 You and Old Joe.
2
@geneeverett33 Sometimes nonlawyers don't understand the deliberate legal loopholes that end with schemes like "motorvoter+voteharvest" fraud. These Communists are every bit as evil as Lenin and Stalin. That includes Newsom and I'm guessing 99% of every Demon Rat politician in California and all of those districts that they rely on in each State to throw the Presidential and Congressional elections.
1
@joannaradacina2585 Too many Marxists in K-12 and Western colleges.
1
@annakaye1629 I understand your feelings about "name calling" and it feels right but the problem is that if you sit and try to "rise above" lying leftist idiots the media turns them in to geniuses because nobody will publicly denounce these metaphorical naked emperors. And if you cleanse your criticism in political correct language it just sounds like...politically correct BS. George Bush had great policies but the left took over the Global War on Terror even before Iraq was attacked. They had this massive Social Justice Occupation or "Nation Building" scheme already planned. Partly because of Cheney but because all of the DC careerists think that they can 'transform global democracy' any time they can justify occupying some new place. They're idiots and only search history for weak examples to support what they already want to do. German and Japan after WWII were both occupied but the conditions there were not really comparable from one to another. Now talk about Iraq being like post WWII Germany or Japan? These people are so effing stupid. And they have supposed "conservative" academics like Francis Fukuyama and other "Realists" (neo-Marxist frauds) making RINO's feel like Special Social Justice Warriors Chosen by God. Romney is even worse. Basically, we are not reliving history. We're living through another wave of lying Jacobin-Marxist Fabianist wave but this time the "democratic hero" is Communist China and every critic of the left is called "racist" at the drop of a hat. And the only PC response is to shut your mouth and take it. Like George Bush did. Bush 41 had a similar problem even though his Gulf War was viewed as entirely successful by most of the world. The Progs nailed both Bushes. Go back to Reagan and his success was different because he'd been giving political speeches since the 1960s and had two controversial but successful terms as governor of California. The last great Republican prior to Reagan was Lincoln, and he got shot so that his VP traitor (Democrat) took over the Oval Office and undid Reconstruction. There's no SOP for what we face now, if we want to ensure victory.
1
@nonyab3843 Every choice can be viewed as wrong by someone if not everyone.
1
Which recovering leftist are you referring to?
1
@joey8567 Trump as POTUS for a second term after Biden is so far removed from normal that there is no "play book" for picking a running mate. He needs to get max electoral votes, obviously, but at the same time his second term needs to be clearly the first of 3 consecutive MAGA terms where VPOTUS is seen as the obvious heir. This is mainly because the US Democratic Party has become the de facto enemy of all free people. And half the country thinks that they're "liberal" saviors by promising free stuff and price controls all while destroying manufacturing and energy sectors. If there is a perfect pick it would have been Ted Cruz as heir but Ted would not help Trump win any States. Ted supporters are all MAGA. The VP in these conditions (voter fraud and Communist media) means that VP needs to help bring in fence-sitters in swing States. So anyone that can name a better choice is welcome to, but they can't. The other "good guys" are from Florida or Texas, and those are not swing States this time around.
1
@nonyab3843 LMFAO.
1