Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "“Worth $200 Billion” - Are Bill and Hillary Clinton More Corrupt Than Vladimir Putin?" video.

  1.  @anonymoustoo4945  The conditions are different from Putin. Putin is no different from any other Marxist in power. He saw conditions worsen for his homeland when they lost the satellites. Although this didn't affect his prospects for building whatever wealth he wanted to. But comparing him to Musk is mendacious in more ways than stated. Putin would struggle even more raising hard currency than Musk would. Putin would have to go through this vast labyrinth and get help from Xi. Both can live any way that they choose but Musk has a clearer conscience.
    3
  2.  @richardgonzales3562  Water is wet is a verifiable claim. He made no verifiable claims.
    2
  3. First of all, nobody in Russia ever had property rights under equal application of the law. This is true with most or perhaps all of Europe as well. The US Constitution is unique because of the Bill of Rights and Constitutionally framed separations of branches laterally and States versus the Federal government vertically. When you say so and so steals, it's POV. Calling Putin a kleptocrat is OK from the Western POV because of Western traditions for holding property in the age of "democracy" or "democratic rights" when the public is told that they have "rights" to hold their property under contract law and whatever. If property is theft, as earlier socialists claim, then Putin is Russia Robin Hood. This is the nature of humans that have no fear of the Ten Commandments. Worse is the European socialists, especially dogmatic Marxists, that actually hold to "Social Darwinism" that implies an Ubermensch class is needed to "liberate" the people. It is strongly implied all over the West that these tyrants, including in the USA, are following all of the socialist doctrines, including Freudian psychology, that posits an inability for all persons to reconcile "truth' without "science". According to Critical Theory Marxism, Putin is a "Liberator" but also a fascist because he turned away from Stalinist imperialism in the name of liberating the Third Estate throughout the world or "International Workers" as Marx originally described the Untermensch cannon fodder. Putin is no different than Hillary Clinton in philosophy and behavior. Hillary has never been a head of any state. So she has no military sworn to follow her. That's the essential difference between the two. Let's not play these Special Pleading games where Hitler and Putin are like special mutations and so forth. Their so called liberals under Marxist Liberation Theory. Hillary is jealous of Putin. And angry that he openly criticized her. Hillary is actually a much bigger hypocrite because Putin never said he is running a rule of law republic.
    1
  4.  @bhec7715  It's POV truth. He explained how Putin fits within the Critical Theory "community truth" analytical paradigm.
    1
  5.  @mikelopia0099  He didn't make an evidence-based argument. It was all subjective Marxist Critical Theory nonsense. I find it hilarious when Marxists try to demonize each other.
    1
  6. Not his own government. His own preferred political party. All of his heroes do the same as the ones they attempt to demonize.
    1
  7.  @SenorJuan2023  Either everyone has a conscience or nobody has one, depending on whose whacky theories you follow.
    1