Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Liberal Hivemind" channel.

  1. @GavinNewsomtheGOAT You don't even know what we're discussing.
    2
  2. Binary thinking in politics comes directly from Marx. And why do these people NEVER discuss CCP infiltration, bribes, blackmail, espionage on a scale achieved only rarely by the Russians in the peak of the Soviet Russian epoch. The number one problem is that leftists think only about EU Brain Trusts. And even they are too stupid to understand that the long term threat comes to them from China, not Russia. If Russia does and FA in Europe it's purely under pressure from sharing a border with the richest Communist dictatorship with the biggest (personnel wise) military in human history. Maybe India can compete on manpower but they're far from a Communist dictatorship.
    2
  3.  @bertkilborne6464  Dog whistle theory is the most hilarious of all. They rely on it every single day.
    2
  4. ​ @ZackarySchejbalCODBO2RGM2  They don't say "Our Democracy" because they care about the rules. Without rules there can be no democracy. Anyone whose entire focus on is 'feelings' about 'democracy' is an idiot. If you say "our democracy" you must define it. In the USA it is defined by the freaking written Constitution. The word "democracy" is used to pretend that this party is the true Jacobin party as the Jacobins claimed to represent the disenfranchised "folks" or peasants or "demos" in France and then eventually they globalized this 3 class construct. What they have in mind is "True Democracy" needs Jacobin "experts" to run justice and the macroeconomy because "the patriarchy' is so tricky and powerful and they get people to obey the Ten Commandments rather than retaking what is rightly theirs by virtue of the fact that they want it and we Jacobins are threatened by these untethered rich, competent people.
    2
  5. That's fatalistic and dismissive. Why don't you run for Senate and help fix the problem?
    2
  6. These are insane hypocrites. You don't pay 50% if gross revenue for income tax. Nobody does. If she has payroll expenses those come out long, long before anyone even tries to calculate taxable income. And even if she has "only" $5 million in taxable income after business expenses are accounted for she still doesn't have to take all of that as taxable income. Most people buy at least one home or "primary residence" and that gets a boatload of tax deductions. And then she can hold the rest in "tax havens" aside from what she wants to spend on her own "lifestyle" BS each year. Basically, she only has to use taxable income on entertainment, food and travel (including commutes) that she can't write off as business expenses. I want lower tax rates than we have but people with very high income are not paying 50% of gross for taxes. What it is is that if you live in a "blue State" that you can pay close to 30% for FICA and then all of your other State and Federal taxes bump it up to 50% of your taxable income after business expanses and "tax haven" diversions are accounted for.
    2
  7. These people glorify and sort of get on the terrorist train virtually and it affects the body politic. The US government should not be involved in censorship. But victims should be allowed to sue in accordance with defamation and racketeering statutes. And then most of them won't be affected but rioting and looting will not go viral so quickly in the USA. Facebook censors constantly. I don't even care about some dude that claims to be a freedom fighter that got censored for flirting with people purportedly fighting for freedom under the HAMAS banner. HAMAS claims to be "resistance" but their first big "resistance" fight was against FATAH and it's pretty well known that most and perhaps all of their funding and weapons comes from Iran. Iran is in alignment with China and Russia to sort of take over all of the "middle easter" nation-states. This was the idea promoted by lunatics that approached Obama while he was running. This was supposed to stabilize Iraq and allow Obama to focus on "Winning the War on Terror" in Afghanistan. That's how old this talking point is. Even the British and the Germans statists are OK with having Iran dominate the whole region so that energy markets become more stable. The bonus for the US Marxists is they can brag about "Global Equity" by harming their own middle class and statistically pumping up GDP for "oppressed people" that they propose to manage like Orwell's Pigs managed the Animal Farm. Obama had good intentions but he's always been a naive ideologue that feels oppressed not by "banks" or "whiteness" but by "Patriarchy".
    2
  8.  @grimaffiliations3671  LOL. It's not a relevant precedent at all.
    2
  9. Fascism is Marxism with a nationalist/ethnic/tribal face. Period. That's it. There's no other difference. Not only that but all of the fascists responded to Marxism with their own "origin story" to become what Lenin eventually called The Vanguard Party. IOW, Lenin invented the policy framework for Fascism. The Italians used Roman imagery to make a sort of claim to be the logical heirs of the Roman Empire. Just like Russian "czars". And so forth. The Nazis were in a pickle because they had to reach further in to delusional views of history to come up with a story that people understood in simple terms that made them "Vanguard Party" AKA "Ubermensch" political class. And under Marxism the political class is the ruling class. If you go back to "socialism" before Marx you simply lose Marx's Labor Value Theory and the stupid stories that conflate "Third Estate" down to "wage slaves" and all "Power" is the Capitalist class. The French Jacobins also knew they were dealing with philosophy and struggles for power. Marx took his dogmas from extrapolating on Darwin's theory to make it a "science" and all derivative doctrines that he came up with were therefore "Political Science".
    2
  10.  @MoonlightCursedOne  As if they want to send their Electors back to give State legislatures time and "permission" to perform forensic audits. You don't seem to understand how things work. January 6 was ensuring that no vote was taken to support this "democratic" consensus (for audits as suggested by Ted Cruz and other Senators). And that is all Joint Session President can support. He can't issue his own decrees.
    2
  11.  @jimk4267  Right. And good business is good for the People.
    2
  12. Dude, it's Critical Theory Marxism. They take "victim groups" and "curate" grievance and protect violent behavior from any corner that they can control. They want to destroy everything. Critical Theory Marxists act on all of these things while seeing themselves as members of a "liberation" victim group. This PM is a Patriarchy-blaming ho mo. Under Critical Theory, Whiteness, White Supremacy and Patriarchy are all just different "modes" of the Capitalist Class. The answer is the rule of law (equal application) and vetting immigrants for compliance with it.
    2
  13.  @SamtheBravesFan  Correct. The root problem is how much we've allowed the Federal government to intervene in "free market" economic activities. They should not have that power. The only legitimate power they have pertains to national security and weapons/security contracts. So we can't completely eliminate it all but these effing people should have zero power over any other economic sectors. They should pass laws that are enforced by the Executive Branches in DC and each State. And of course with civil penalties the victims can sue these Internet companies (and medical insurance companies, etc.). The rule of law as it was before FDR. And Congress is also supposed to police itself. But for decades everyone has only ever voted for scoundrels taht they believe will bring a slice of the corrupt pie to them and their district/State. Or worse. Marxists that want to "defend the interests of the people" by destroying "Capitalism". If what I say is correct, the root of all of these problems is allowing DC to have any influence whatsoever on K-12. And even passing funds for this and that to universities leads to this kind of corruption unless it's done strictly for military contracts and that kind of research. If it's narrowed to that then it's easier to find the corrupt people. Especially when foreign adversaries send people here on student visas to work on those "university research" military contracts. BTW, look at Biden's relationships with "universities". His Chinamoney buys a lot of stolen military IP for "foreign students" and "guest professors".
    2
  14.  @Boskov01  OK, but that does not fall under the doctrine of "abortion rights". That falls under the doctrine of due process rights for unborn humans. You create a Federal law that maps out "due process" for terminating a fetus's life in the womb. Cases would come up before the courts and if necessary SCOTUS would defend it. For planned infanticide, doctors should have to pass certain tests for each case and submit applications for death warrants. It can be streamlined so that a county judge must sign off on it first and then document the entire case for review. Look at what has to happen already to terminate the life of convicted murders. Look at how much money we spend on each case. It would not have to be like that. It would just have to be carefully documented for review so that a reasonable "due process" can emerge for the unborn. And the unborn would have State-paid advocates (lawyers, just like all criminals due that are put through the judicial system) to monitor the death warrants. Once this is all documented and becomes reviewable it will change public sentiment as reality sets in. Only pathetic, sociopathic ghouls can defend the status quo if they understand it in detail.
    2
  15.  @EgoBrain1  You can't categorically ban or regulate "abortion" as a procedure. You have to focus on deprivation of rights of the fetuses.
    2
  16.  @hillbillypb1522  Pardoned for what?
    2
  17.  @armondtanz  Yes, Karl. We get it.
    2
  18.  @-Only.Facts-  The organized criminals send in "Oppressed Persons" to take the fall when things get difficult. This game is many decades old.
    2
  19.  @johnjames5842  Blue city youths.
    2
  20. The rule of law is a threat to all Communists. Period.
    1
  21.  @이이-n4z8y  4 weeks, if that.
    1
  22.  @SamtheBravesFan  The people that created and grew this Satanic criminal cult are mostly dead. And it might be too late because almost nobody knows how to properly define "the rule of law" properly. So the big lie has birthed an infinite stream of lies to defend all of the corruption.
    1
  23.  @wrath4452  Hence, proving you are literally insane. Look up the definition.
    1
  24.  @Handlelesswithme  Some lies are protected and others are not. DOJ officials can't lie with impunity. Unless they are representing The Party of Lies. AKA The Party of Slavery.
    1
  25. The dividing line is totalitarian Marxists versus those that oppose them. It's not really "two sides". It's a criminal element and those that don't fall in line.
    1
  26.  @DemocracyOfficer2485  Speak for yourself. And your cult, I presume.
    1
  27.  @DemocracyOfficer2485  You have the leftist hivemind rhetoric down pat, whether or not you realize is. I have never in my life taken political debates seriously. What is unique about Trump is that his platform is not designed to please DC "power". And he has no incentive at all to bend his policies to please a pack of idiots in DC. I don't know why you call yourself "conservative" because you write like a Randian leftist. Ayn Rand never "deconstructed" the fallacies of socialism. She attacked it with the mind of a leftist that didn't want to run with the mob. She also understood that from Napoleon to Stalin that it always turns to genocide.
    1
  28.  @Retro-Iron11  That's interesting. So you're the only non-NPC because you toss that in to the mix to prove your bona fides? Explain where you got your fallacious straw man from. You're not yet a "playable character", bro.
    1
  29.  @MrGchiasson  There are no longer Presidential debate and rarely any other kind of political debates per se. The simple reason is that ever since the US Democratic Party was formed they organized around an evil worldview. It's been a battle for hegemony ever since that time. Marxists and "socialists" agree with my assessment except that they define their opposition as evil whereas I identify them as pseudoscientific idiots that do evil posing as "social justice". Even before the Civil War the Democrats posed as victims of "Norther Patricians" protected by the "evil" Republican Party. This fused perfectly with Marxist agitation propaganda that developed right alongside our own evil party.
    1
  30.  @DemocracyOfficer2485  Those two issues are your best examples and you can't even cite specifically what your problem is? Red flag laws still can't overcome the Bill of Rights. I mean, a lot of people think that you can't force crazy people to seek help. Yet we get around that with laws that allow police to arrest certain people to put them under observation for a few days and they can be committed. Red flag laws would only build on that and due process guarantees apply to both. You also have SCOTUS just OK'ed laws that deny gun rights to "domestic violence" something something. So these laws already exist under another nomenclature. What Trump said about NATO is dead on and long overdue. For me he did not go far enough. These are all one way treaties. And therefore not really legitimate. The USA already has a clear path to join any fight that any President chooses. Why should we make stupid, open ended promises to corrupt regimes that date back to Stalin's Communist imperialism that was actually funded originally by FDR? All defense treaties should be bilateral or not exist at all. Multilateral agreements are supposedly the cause of WWI, in case you didn't know. And the cause of WWII is very clearly the Treaty of Versailles, also a multilateral treaty. The best you can hope for in "multilateralism" is the UN with some purges of groups that do not belong because even the UN deceives the public about its legitimate role and mission in international relations. The only US politician that never comes across as an idiot is Ted Cruz and any time someone like Cruz (or me) talks realistically with people most eyes just glaze over. The American (including Canada and Mexico) public doesn't care to learn about anything important in politics. They just want their stuff. European citizens as a bunch are even more nihilistic. NATO was critical during a certain phase of history simply because of how we fought WWII and how FDR set up Stalin to take over all of Eastern Europe. Intentionally. The British rule over India was regarded as worse than Stalin's rule, according to FDR. FDR envisioned British as it is today and the Soviet Union becoming the dominant political entity in Europe as the USA dominates North America. The point being that all of these programs, if they have any legitimacy at all, were about solving very specific problems. If they are not solved by now it's time to reboot and solve today's problems rather than nursing sacred cows of our neo0-Marxist past.
    1
  31.  @DemocracyOfficer2485  BTW, I mentioned Ted Cruz because I argued against Trump and for Cruz. Once Trump won that primary campaign I was not triggered. I just warned people about the chaos. I was not wrong about the chaos but I was wrong in interpreting Trump's rhetoric as indicative of his alleged low IQ simple mind. If I look at what he actually does and where he endures at great personal risk he is way beyond what I could have expected. Not only that, the Marxists are way, way crazier than I had ever imagined. Even James Comey and John Brennan admitted casually that they were Communists in college and then implied that they're something even more advanced! (Thank Francis Fukuyama for that fallacious "democracy defeated communism" subcult). I thought that these Marxists were just arrogant demagogues playing with "Trigger" theory. But they truly are triggered idiots. This astounds me to this day. Don't be a triggered idiot. It's not good for anyone.
    1
  32.  @Retro-Iron11  How old are you?
    1
  33.  @thecollierreport  There's no denying what you say about Trump is true. And then some. What we have is a spectrum of choices and he's far and away the best choice for 2024. The others can stand in line and take up the reins if we as US Citizens defend Constitution-grounded governing paradigms and get rid of these cancerous, innately unconstitutional "Federal agencies" that actually fight legitimate elected government officials to serve the CCP and European socialists.
    1
  34.  @maximusmeridius6610  Kennedy can have a Cabinet position. He's really not savvy enough for President and therefore not for VP. Anyone that would run as a Democratic Party candidate in the USA has something severely wrong with them. He's delusional if he thinks he can "restore" a party that was never a legitimate Constitutionalist party. They're Jacobin slavers still craving one-party rule.
    1
  35.  @kameronlavender1478  Citizen President Trump, political office holder and candidate because of endless failures from the cult of careerist politicians in the US (and a lot of the so called "free world").
    1
  36. Pepperidge Farms remembers.
    1
  37.  @robwilkerson8139  I was born and raised in California. I understand what you mean but the US Democratic Party has NEVER been liberal. They pose as "liberal" for the sake of the baby boomers and their scion. They are even "liberal" about who they choose as puppets for their political theater. They have NEVER been liberal. No liberal would ever join or caucus with the party of slavery. And it's just a fact of history that the KKK and Progressive movements in the USA were joined at the hip just as Hitler Youth (or Black and Brown shirted street thugs) and the main party were one and the same movement.
    1
  38. These are all exaggerations, to say the least. But my problem basically comes from this: US politicians destroyed our schools and destroyed economic liberty at all levels from getting an entry level job to opening up your own business, whatever business that might be. The economic liberty is greater in China than it is here, but China is Communist and so you can't really count on keeping it. With respect to India, it is very large and as far as I know all of the engineering schools teach in English. So adding that pool of workers is obviously favorable to employers. Especially since the cost of living for the students is much lower and it's not just "culture" but Indian workers rarely carry debts with them to the USA. According to Libertarian economics this is all OK because both the US and India are experiencing "progress" in "knowledge" and material development. But hiring Chinese and hiring Indian workers in the USA is full of risks. China is obviously the very worst because there are no benefits to us other than a willingness to work for almost nothing if the regime orders it. And because China is "Communist" and does not hold elections, its leaders can exploit its own workers and do anthi9ng that they want so if China governs badly (not unlike North Korea) all of this "development" of their people will not go to the benefit of the masses but will only make the regime stronger and more likely to turn to zero-sum expansion (like China's expansion in to the "South China Sea". So there is no way we should ever hire people associated with the CCP. Even if they are acting in good faith the CCP tracks its subjects globally and never overlooks an opportunity for espionage and sabotage of "Capitalism". We don't have those risks with India. India's development creates more prosperity for itself and for global trade which has the potential to benefit other nations and its citizens. The key to all of this is how does it affect the rule of law? And the problem with any immigrants these days is that the DC regime is using everyone to manage their own "GDP" goals and then "Disparity" (that actually is planned, expected and hoped for) is handled through government programs that turn everyone in to subservient subjects that care less about their Constitutional rights and more about their "civil rights" as they perceive them. IOW, to cut to the chase, the people that act as gatekeepers for visas and programs and so forth use it politically with a Marxist materialist worldview. And they don't GAF if their own people are harmed because they think everyone is spoiled and that the world is far too overpopulated. That's the problem. There is nobody to run these visa (and any "Equity") programs in good faith. They are all scams against the US Citizens. Even if the corporations, like Tesla, ask for more workers' visas, the whole program is so rotten that you can be sure that they will screw everyone involved. The US Federal government has way too much power and compromising with something that should be a good thing in theory is stupid because we already know what they have done. We must "drain the swamp" by taking all discretion away from these unelected bureaucrats. Maybe Trump can come up with a reasonable compromise for his administration and just hope that collectively, Elon, Vivek and The Donald can slash deep state power, taxes, burdensome regulations and so forth so that in 1 year or 2 nobody will even think about workers' visas and whatever compromise Trump comes up with. But Vivek and Elon are acting like Dunning Kruger ignoramuses. They are unaware of their own cognitive deficits. They are very proud of themselves for the successes they experienced in Silly Con Valley. It's a well known disease. Trust me on that. But to summarize my response to your comment on India, it's a bigger (English speaking) pool. They have no "national" superiority of any kind relative to the USA. Except they have a bigger population and they actually have some pretty good engineering programs. I assume they want to start building their own native jets planes and so forth so actually, the best engineers really don't want to leave India. Elon Musk, you know, I don't want to gratuitously insult the guy, but he's sitting here with a Tesla factory in Communist China and he thought he would get away with building Teslas in California and never have to worry about the labor unions. He's not a realist at all. Vivek also seems to be getting a fat head, but I think Trump is experienced enough to know what I'm talking about here. Trump ran his own airline for a while and I think Trump is the kind of guy that learns from his mistakes. He has dealt with a lot of arrogant architects and engineers in his time and you can be sure of this because it's impossible that he hasn't.
    1
  39.  @notcoleman711  If you don't know what the other choices are you know you're at the top. It's your judgment from the outside that makes it (relatively) terrible. What amazes me is all of the talk about India or anywhere else when the worst regimes are Communist regimes and Mexico, which run by so called drug lords. But nobody is here complaining about US-funded factories in Mexico. Weird. And traveling to Mexico, if you choose, you can find all of the worst filth and deprivation you'll find anywhere else. Or you can choose to go to the resorts and pretend it's all OK. Just like the rich Indians do when they walk past the poor people in the streets.
    1
  40.  @charlesfritz7131  FDR loved America and Stalin. Thank God Trump doesn't worship collectivist morons as political messiahs.
    1
  41.  @wrath4452  You morons don't even know what dictator means. It comes from the ancient Roman Republic. Trump is a libertarian that does not filter his rhetoric in accordance with Marxist Critical Theory "Political Correctness".
    1
  42.  @boogeyratt  The Biden regime did it all intentionally and bragged about it. They just didn't take the blame for the actual results. Social Justice, This Justice, That Justice, Equity, all about ensuring we buy garbage from China and shut down our own energy consumption and import more and more from China.
    1
  43. These people are like a Mafia crime family that wound up creating a political party to protect slavery and then went on to destroy an entire country. Not just "like". That is what they are.
    1
  44. BTW, you have to understand the left's fallacious worldview dogmas. Saying Trump is "rattled" or whatever comes from the same form of "analysis" that allowed them to seriously promote the idea that he's another Hitler. It's related to Trigger theory and the Oppressor Oppressed binary. Oppressors trigger the oppressed. If Elon is "triggering" Trump this means he's not perfectly loyal the way Stalinists expect regime puppets to be. Therefore Trump is rattled because it's like Khrushchev spreading rumors about Stalin. Of course, they think Soviet Communists are the "liberals" so it would be like Rommel expressing skepticism about the war in Africa. Because these guys are total Experts in all of the Social Science. They know their sheet.
    1
  45. That mayor is not a liberal. He's a typical hivemind tyrant wannabe. In the bee world he's a worker bee that wants to become a queen. The US Democratic Party is the most illiberal party since the German Nazis of the Third Reich. And before Hitler ramped up the paranoia (and some of what he feared was true with respect to France and Russia) the US Democratic Party was much worse than the German Nazi party. Woodrow Wilson was basically a prototype for Hitler to follow except we never heard about any work/death camps run by Wilson. Bill Maher is an actual liberal moron. He's not a closet Marxist. Bill Maher still defended closet Marxists running for office for many decades. But he is basically liberal-minded and a typical example of what Dunning and Kruger call "unskilled and unaware". Our Marxist schools indoctrinate students to believe in Marxist dogmas including Marx's "false consciousness". This maps out to liberal and Marxist morons constantly calling people smarter than them "science deniers". There are not that many leftists that you can still have a converation with where they can actually criticize The Party. Liberals are not hiveminders. Hiveminded "liberals" are Jacobin Marxists.
    1
  46.  JamesMartin-intelligent s This is hilarious. So, let's say you try to rhetorically defend everything that you allude to. Why don't you try? The 1950s was an absolutely legitimate scandal upon the discover that Stalin had been the recipient of US largesse to "right fascism" and then use this "liberation" funding to capture what we now refer to (looking back) as captive Soviet satellite nation-states. The US taxpayer paid for Soviet Communist Imperialism. And not only that it also turned out that while people were waking up to this reality they also found out that some of that funding was sent to Korean and Chinese Communists from Stalin and directly from the USA through the hands of the US State Department. Usually people that make dogmatic claims with their usernames are covering up insecurity. What you know about yourself is that you can't properly defend any of your beliefs. So if you dub yourself "intelligent" and then use a bunch of stale smack talk you cleaned from stupid Hollywood films you can sort of try to feel good about yourself while locked in that basement.
    1
  47.  @cptcosmo  According to Marx, all who follow that agenda are "Communists". It's not about self identity. One of the reasons for this "Gender Identity" BS is to totally confuse anyone's ability to talk to each other with a common worldview. Everyone cause up in the fallacies of these "Political Identities" is fighting for the Communist agenda even if they have no idea what it is. Early neo-Marxists called these groups "Potential Revolutionary Actors". They went around trying to foment anger with "society" at large rather than just trying to preach straight up Marxist doctrines like inheritance and property rights are inherently oppressive and so forth.
    1
  48. He prefers KKK to MAGA. Think about it. He said that this year.
    1
  49.  @gheaflorin  The drugs have value as therapeutics, not for mass immunization campaigns, especially under compulsion and total destruction of Informed Consent (judicial doctrine). Basically, Fauci lied like a fiend and made a ton of money helping Demon Rats steal some more elections.
    1
  50. There are a few in Congress and a few judges with integrity. AT this stage there are so many criminal Marxists that even the good ones struggle to win in court. But go back to the deranged scream about SCOTUS that have been going on since Bork and Clarence Thomas were screwed over. They get worse each time. They constantly scream about "racist" (Constitutionalist) judges. The shortest Critical Theory explanation for this is that the Bill of Rights as written "Preserves ossified disparities". Which is of course ipso facto RACIST for Critical Theory psychotics.
    1