Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "HOLY MOLY! She ACTUALLY pulled this out MID INTERVIEW!!!!!!" video.

  1. The root problem is the idea of "labor versus capital" and the gradual destruction of academies all over the world. The worst are "Western" academies where the pseudoscientific atheists preach "Social Darwinism" and the "inevitability" of a certain "Social Justice Arc of History". Even before WWI some European leaders were highly affected by the Democratic Party and its approach to "labor rights" where the secessionists sought revenge, reprisal and one party dominance by "speaking truth to power" with Jim Crow and "labor rights" that excluded non-whites and tried to claw "populist" power back from the Republican Party in that way. On a seemingly separate track the cultural impact of Darwinism (dogmatic belief in Evolutionary Theory) led to all kind of paranoid narratives about humans acting like animals. Additionally, Darwinism sprang forth this idea of a binary "class war" that was deniable only by people suffering from cognitive dissonance or what Richard Dawkins would later call "God Delusion". Both the British and the American academies more and more started to attack anything that defended rational uncertainty theory in the sciences. What we call Critical Theory today sprang from German immigrants in the 1930s and 1940s that were identified as "Frankfurt School" Communists that were "realistic" about the problem with the Communist Manifesto only in the sense that the "International Workers' Revolution" was not going to happen. It was just regarded as "Realistic" to "look critically" at the facts pertaining to the Communist Manifesto in the context of the Russian revolutions and Lenin's pivot once he established the first "Communist" regime in Russia. In any case, all of the criticism and so forth did nothing to debunk the insane inferences people took from Marx's nonsense at how it evolved historically. The root dogmas were defended as "facts". By the time I went to school I studied law, engineering and I had enough biology to understand Darwin's theory perfectly. When I heard about Marx I just laughed. I knew all of history since Marx debunked everything. But I noticed that weak minded people that didn't really want to work would say "Yeah, Marx is a joke." But if they needed an excuse for something or an explanation they'd use Marxist tropes in the "whataboutist" form of rhetoric. Like, yeah, but whatabout Capitalism". I thought these were unserious people. What I slowly realized is that they were serious about their confusion and inability to explore all of their faulty beliefs. By the time Obama was President I tried to explain why so many people were "triggered" by his Critical Theory tropes. That's when I realized it had infected so many people. And it's worse in Europe because of "historical" monarchy and land rights in Europe. The Europeans are the ones that needed "land reform" and so forth. But they made compromises with "historical power" and now under "Social Darwinism" they have sort of created this two tier political system of socialist Victicrats to replace the peasants and woke governing "scientific" elites that take for granted that progress always involves "selective pressures---survival of the fittest". Or as Nietzsche would say, maybe war is good for progress? It's interesting to debate the whacky theories until you realize how gaslit our students were becoming. Once the statists started promoting the promises of "AI" and "green energy" against their Henny Penny doom and gloom threats these terrified gaslit idiots started lining up with leftist regimes as the "scientists" taht were going to solve the world's political problems. They know it involves centrally planned "selective pressures" and death. Think about "Our Democratic Pandemic Response" before you attempt to debunk anything that I have written. When Fauci talks about "science" and "Progress" you have to understand why he can't cite the "science" he's referring to. Because he wants to include "selective pressures" for "progress" in all things, not just medicine. He's nihilistic about body counts and he's OK if the vaccines kill some people that would have otherwise survived because in theory mankind benefits by having (theoretically, under dogmatic "progressive" doctrines) more effective vaccines and the population getting "right sized" in the struggle to control deadly viruses can possibly help as much as free abortion clinics worldwide. All of the people that destroyed informed consent pertaining to the array of vaccines available are also the same people that rage against SCOTUS for abrogating Roe v. Wade. It's a one to one mapping.
    1