Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "You gotta be KIDDING ME!!!!!!" video.

He probably got the same number of votes in 2020 but some of the new voters replaced the traitors like "RINO" officials that endorsed Trump and then followed this Marxist fiction called "The Insurrection". And Biden probably got around or fewer in 2020 than Harris supposedly got this time. She probably only got 50 million or less legitimate votes and Biden might have gotten a little more than that in 2020. I know this because for my entire life in California I have seen how they cheat as if it's key to Overcoming Capitalist Oppression. The reason they ALWAYS talk about "the disenfranchised" is because this idea allows for the invention of vote to replaced these theoretical disenfranchised. Plus this talking point was created by the French Jacobins even before they incited anarcho-terrorists and then employed their own terror regime while bragging about it. But all terrorists have to lie when trying to corrupt elections. Once they openly turn to terrorism they can no longer pretend to be "egalitarian" or whatever. And just as a recent example for one Senate candidate in California, look how many votes Adam Schiff got. Everyone hates that scumbag and everyone loves his Republican rival. Even in California. Schiff got around 6 million votes. LOL. His beloved rival got 4 million. It's hard to fathom but I doubt even half of Schiff's ballots were legitimate. Every CA registered illegal alien voted for Schiff. This I guarantee.
1
@kellyupdyke8141 What I noticed this time is that the digital crimes were small scale or nonexistent. The traditional ballot scams, however, were in full effect. 2020 was a watershed moment in theft but also an awakening. They played defense the entire time since then but they knew they could not repeat the most blatant frauds. And most people didn't even realize it was legal in the US to use computers (Windows machines that can't even pass basic security tests for "corporate" use, for sure none can pass minimal Federal standards). Federal cybersecurity law is always in effect if there is any nexus with any Federal institution. States run the elections to send winners to DC. Hence Federal law must be followed in everything but clear Constitutional prerogatives (like control of State Electors). BTW, this is also why our schools deliberately cultivate ignoramuses even if they expect to cultivate "science and tech" geniuses. Almost all student because cultivated ignoramuses in philosophies, critical thinking and especially how "words" and rhetoric shape court cases and how judges are supposed to defend the proper reading of the US Constitution itself. Even some of the brightest people that I know get lost in parsing legitimate Constitutional interpretation from the frauds. "It's complicated". Only because of this problem with our schools. Respect for precedents only has limited application in a Constitutional republic. Generally, in the British system, higher courts can't overturn their own precedents unless they have a new argument. In the US the Supreme Court is not supposed to create any precents that have the effect of new legislation. If SCOTUS had freed the slaves this would have been by protecting legitimate due process guarantees for the petitioners. When SCOTUS abrogated Roe v. Wade that was precisely what they're supposed to do for bad legislation and the actual SCOTUS holding was insane. It was legal brick-building for the destruction of the entire Bill of Rights by creating so many "rights" arguments that only SCOTUS or some future supermajority of Marxists could decide on anything. That's now what it means to have rights protections in court. SCOTUS "Marriage" was from a legal perspective even worse. All marriage rights fall under "Civil Rights" and making male and female fungible is not something any US court can ever legally do.
1
@LaCommentaire You have to understand taht this is a cult, not really a cult with a single leader that can send marching orders down the line like Hitler, Stalin or any other totalitarian Marxist regime. And even at the very top you have consensus, not total agreement on contingency plans and so forth. Even the details on the local level are kept isolated from the top people who give strategic planning and guidance. What that means is that they have general ideas on how to shut down Trump, how to steal elections, how to employ lawfare and so forth. Even the January 6 lawfare that was planned from the top had State level idiots wanted to catch some action and while they did coordinate with the Biden regime, it's like the blind leading the blind. They are united only by their malevolent intentions and guiding ethos. And the risks kept increasing at Trump and his supporters refused to cave. Kamala as President requires more gaslighting and cheating than Biden did and they didn't have "COVID" to do. Even if they did plan another "natural outbreak" the public has grown wiser and more properly cynical. So, basically, they're really run out of options that could have been planned in advance. The thing that will start all over again are the 'Hitler' tropes and the histrionics in Congress and they'll see how far they can get with that. Even Kammy knows by instinct that that is now all that they have. Listen to her angry Marxist concession 'Keep fighting Patriarchy (Capitalism)' speech. So really, they are in much worse position than they were when Obama was getting ready to receive Trump and had already activated that moron James Comey and his FBI minions. Plus Andrew Weissmann (and the likes of Jack Smith) were already on alert once Trump won in 2016. They're almost entirely played out. They have to start over but the one thing they want give up on is faith in the Communist Manifesto and Marxist "global solidarity". Something will occur to them but the good guys have them well covered. They declared war on us and it took almost year years for some to realize it. Now we all know the score. Their agenda only ever had the potential to destroy. We'll see what they come up with next.
1
@Marine2111usmc Cheating involves a lot of hard work.
1