Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Ana Kasparian finally opens up about her political change!" video.

I chuckled the first time I heard the "TDS" trope. The thing is that it truly is a syndrome. It's caused by the Critical Theory and PC psyops cult. I laughed because it truly has nothing to do with Trump personally other than the fact that, in a nutshell, the Clintons planned their 4 years in office before they won Bill's first term. That's just a fact. And even if you don't accept it you should accept the fact that Hillary as "FLOTUS" was given a bigger portfolio than any of other FLOTUS since Eleanor Roosevelt. And she didn't hide the fact that she wanted to be the first female POTUS. But Bill Clinton is not quite as stupid as he seems to be. He's stupid alright but he understands the basics of electoral politics. Looking back, the last time a single party kept the White House for 4 straight terms was FDR and Truman finished FDR's fourth and then took another before Ike ran as a Republican to replace Truman after Truman signed the Amendment outlawing more than 2 terms. Reagan won two terms in a landslide and then his VP won a single term before Bill replaced him. Therefore Bill himself went in knowing that if Hillary were to win the White House she would have to have a long term strategy. That is why Bill did not want Gore to win. That would have put off Hillary's scheme even further. They wanted the Republican Party to win 1 or 2 terms and then when the time was right they would run Hillary after she spent a stint in the Senate. All went OK, as expected, until Obama showed up. And as we all know, Obama won. But this DNC cult is really not about any single person as elected leader. It can't survive longer than 2 terms if taht is what the cult is all about. So Obama was seen as a "Magic Negro" (look it up) Social Justice harbinger. And that pushed Hillary's plans back. But Hillary is stupid and impatient. She stopped worrying about the general trend of having the Oval Office swap parties pretty steadily after each President terms out. She negotiated the US SECSTATE gig and kept up her fascist/corporatism CGI grift. Going back to Obama, he alluded to a lot of Critical Theory tropes while in office and the "broken eggs" (see Stalin's omelet trope) didn't bother him. But as a harbinger he deluded his entire cult in to thinking that they had reached certain prophesied milestones. For Hillary to lose destroyed their "Arc of Social Justice History" and because a caricatured "Fat Cat Capitalist" beat her, he completely destroyed this cult's confidence in pretty much everything that they try to determine and predicted using "Social Sciences". And this drove them insane because, well, they had already driven themselves insane since the Cold War and Clinton's pivot to building up the CCP as a "developing nation" like any other. TDS is not about Trump per se. It's about a cult of abject idiots taht simply can't believe that Fat Cat Oligarchs can come in and steal what they think is rightfully theirs. They think the age of single party "socialism" or "democratic" Communism had already arrived with Obama. Instead of understanding the euphoria over Obama as simple proof that the electorate was not really innately racist they spun it every which way possible to regard themselves as geniuses with the right to rule forever under Our Single Party Socialist Democracy. And Trump very clearly and loudly not just beat them but his rhetoric is even more brutal than mine is. But also, look back at some of the Critical Theory rubrics that have been around for decades. Maslow's Hierarchy is where insane nutjobs get their virtue signaling doctrines from. If you show how triggered you are, you show how needy you are. That's how this cult protects criminals and also shows activists how to show they are on the "right side of history". So when people went insane over Trump's first victory and the riots started I already had all of this in mind and for me it was SOP for the left. Occupy Wall Street was the sign for me that Obama was seen by many as a Social Justice harbinger and they thought he age of universal basic income and free medical insurance for all had arrived. Think of how Trump trashed Obama's programs. Because everyone woke really does turn to shit. Everything dogmatic socialists touch turns to shit. In short, TDS is totally real even according to Critical Theory. The woke psychologists just have to come up with a different name.
1
Trump apparently hates frauds and liars as much as I do. Hates elections. LOL. Hates election fraud with a passion. As we all should. All but the Marxists who only hate losing. And humanity.
1
@carlwinsloww2153 Dead right. Saul Alinsky is famous for basically politically and socially weaponizing Freudian psychology. Not the therapeutic theories but the "critical" tropes. What amazes me is how incorrigible these morons are. How do they not even begin to try to hold it in? They seem to have no clue how they are destroying their own credibility. They must truly believe in the Settled Social Sciences.
1
@DarthBilldough The DNC regards itself as the (Communist) Vanguard Party. They control the "electoral sciences" and you're a "Science Denier". The Supreme Soviet determines who the Premier will be. Same process as Communist China and Soviet Russia.
1
Why did you conflate religion with self righteousness? Religion does not make people self righteous. People that don't want to accept their own true human condition become self righteous because they don't accept any other entity's standards. They only want to follow their own standards and reject any standard that diminishes their own delusional of grandeur aka "righteousness". Do you not understand how common this is in all societies? Social Justice is a buzz term used to redo "justice" as if the rule of law is racist because Social Justice must be run like Orwell's Animal Farm. Even Erica Arthur Blair was a socialist but he understood that what they were all doing politically was perhaps even worse than the status quo at the time. Status quo in Britain meant institutions like "charter companies" (corporations favored by the monarchy) in the time where the sun never set on the British Empire. That's totally different than a US socialist that didn't have any reason to believe that any of the "socialist" grievances could be solved with doctrinaire socialism. Social Justice is a term of deception, especially in the USA unless you explain your specific theory. Freeing the slaves could be considered "social justice" but more than likely you would have simply invoked the "justice" term. A rule of law republic does not allow the doctrine of "othering" an entire class of humans and deny due process to them. Denial of due process rights is a denial of all legal rights. I don't even need the world "social" for anything at all.
1