Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "We tried to warn them this would happen." video.

These people glorify and sort of get on the terrorist train virtually and it affects the body politic. The US government should not be involved in censorship. But victims should be allowed to sue in accordance with defamation and racketeering statutes. And then most of them won't be affected but rioting and looting will not go viral so quickly in the USA. Facebook censors constantly. I don't even care about some dude that claims to be a freedom fighter that got censored for flirting with people purportedly fighting for freedom under the HAMAS banner. HAMAS claims to be "resistance" but their first big "resistance" fight was against FATAH and it's pretty well known that most and perhaps all of their funding and weapons comes from Iran. Iran is in alignment with China and Russia to sort of take over all of the "middle easter" nation-states. This was the idea promoted by lunatics that approached Obama while he was running. This was supposed to stabilize Iraq and allow Obama to focus on "Winning the War on Terror" in Afghanistan. That's how old this talking point is. Even the British and the Germans statists are OK with having Iran dominate the whole region so that energy markets become more stable. The bonus for the US Marxists is they can brag about "Global Equity" by harming their own middle class and statistically pumping up GDP for "oppressed people" that they propose to manage like Orwell's Pigs managed the Animal Farm. Obama had good intentions but he's always been a naive ideologue that feels oppressed not by "banks" or "whiteness" but by "Patriarchy".
2
@quasarleon4645 The lie here is that we have a free press. Since everyone wants to feed at the Internet trough there are no longer any free presses and not only that the corporate media syndicate is illegal (Sherman Antitrust Act) but made legal by the Administrative state. IOW, the syndicate is allowed to do all of this as long as profits are good and the Administrative state will protect its profits as long as it plays ball with their political demands. The New Deal (under FDR) is that Social Justice syndicates are not just legal but required. The Big 3 Auto manufacturers got that way because unions were forced on them and then wages became "politicized". Those that ran afoul of the Big 3 were decimated and fell by the wayside. And now they're all part of international syndicates. They issue stocks, yes. But you have no idea who holds sway at the Board of Directors meetings. That's just one example. In "Internet" and "high tech" electronics manufacturing it's even worse but they didn't even have to force unions on them. The bought them off first by funding them under "national security" and then forcing them to play ball under the same specious national security rubric. And these people are not worried about fomenting violence and genocide. They're worried about losing the protection of the Administrative state and the "national security" project funds. The so-called Military Industrial Complex (Ike's term) is actually the "Arsenal of Democracy" started up by FDR but by the time Ike was President all of FDR's "Brain Trusts" had created these protected syndicates. Of course, it's worse now that the Internet has destroyed broadcast TV and radio as well as basically every independent printing press in the once free world.
1