Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "He actually POSTED THIS!!! haha" video.

  1. 15
  2. 6
  3. 6
  4. 4
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9.  @DemocracyOfficer2485  Those two issues are your best examples and you can't even cite specifically what your problem is? Red flag laws still can't overcome the Bill of Rights. I mean, a lot of people think that you can't force crazy people to seek help. Yet we get around that with laws that allow police to arrest certain people to put them under observation for a few days and they can be committed. Red flag laws would only build on that and due process guarantees apply to both. You also have SCOTUS just OK'ed laws that deny gun rights to "domestic violence" something something. So these laws already exist under another nomenclature. What Trump said about NATO is dead on and long overdue. For me he did not go far enough. These are all one way treaties. And therefore not really legitimate. The USA already has a clear path to join any fight that any President chooses. Why should we make stupid, open ended promises to corrupt regimes that date back to Stalin's Communist imperialism that was actually funded originally by FDR? All defense treaties should be bilateral or not exist at all. Multilateral agreements are supposedly the cause of WWI, in case you didn't know. And the cause of WWII is very clearly the Treaty of Versailles, also a multilateral treaty. The best you can hope for in "multilateralism" is the UN with some purges of groups that do not belong because even the UN deceives the public about its legitimate role and mission in international relations. The only US politician that never comes across as an idiot is Ted Cruz and any time someone like Cruz (or me) talks realistically with people most eyes just glaze over. The American (including Canada and Mexico) public doesn't care to learn about anything important in politics. They just want their stuff. European citizens as a bunch are even more nihilistic. NATO was critical during a certain phase of history simply because of how we fought WWII and how FDR set up Stalin to take over all of Eastern Europe. Intentionally. The British rule over India was regarded as worse than Stalin's rule, according to FDR. FDR envisioned British as it is today and the Soviet Union becoming the dominant political entity in Europe as the USA dominates North America. The point being that all of these programs, if they have any legitimacy at all, were about solving very specific problems. If they are not solved by now it's time to reboot and solve today's problems rather than nursing sacred cows of our neo0-Marxist past.
    1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1