Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Donald Trump could SUE Mitt Romney for this...." video.

  1.  @markiskool  Worse is if he used "guilty" in any claim of some finding.
    4
  2. No "charge". The term should be (presumably actionable) "damage claim".
    1
  3.  @goldbud2287  Rumor has it that he might join the "No Labels" project where they offer mixed "unity" Presidential tickets and each candidate keeps its alleged party affiliation. So Romney would join with an avowed Demon Rat as a supposed "Republican". Maybe even with Joe Machin. They're both insane Senators thinking that they're totally above the "partisan fray". Effing abject morons.
    1
  4. ​ @londonhughes7382  She's possibly crazier than Romney. She too thinks she has a shot at a No Labels "Unity Ticket" with an avowed DemonRat and she would be the "Republican" that "unifies" the nation by making everyone follow DNC Marxism under the (reformed) Two Party (uniparty) System that Trump is accidentally exposing and destroying. Even through COVID Trump did not quite get it. By the time the FBI started arresting innocent Trump supporters I think he finally started to understand just how completely these people have corrupted the Federal government. I said this in 2015 and predicted something like what he endured. I was wrong because I thought they would make him a one term President and take over Congress. He stood up to them, patiently. He didn't cave but he didn't go for the jugular. So I was wrong about how evil and stupid they are in DC where they really are all corrupt and stupid almost to the last person. I was wrong about how long Trump would last rather than compromise with them as Bush had. Things are far worse than I thought they would get. And yet if we make it then Trump will be by far the most important US President of all time. If he can end his second term with good results and both chambers are run by actual republican Republicans, his Presidency will be more consequential than George Washington's and even though Lincoln emancipated the slaves, Trump is, whether he realizes it or not, protecting us from the slavery of global Communism where they threat has never, ever been greater. He could potentially destroy global Communism for at least another generation. We in the USA must in fact destroy FDR's New Deal Fabian Communism. Planted by FDR and Stalin. More and more even the idiot news anchors are starting to clearly explain the "threat" of "Right Wing SCOTUS" is to "Overturn the New Deal" (Marxist jurisprudence for "agencies" and their "Social Justice" nonsense for "corporations" have no property or speech rights). Neither do "plutocrats" like Trump. It's never been easier to understand than it is today, even for a high school student surrounded by delusional Critical Theory (unionized) teaches.
    1
  5. A tort lawsuit CAN NOT find guilt. It can only find liability. Even if they wanted to order Trump to compensate her for a "rape finding" it would be "liable" for "damage". Not "guilt". And the specific difference in terms of proof is the difference between "preponderance of evidence" where juries can just feel sorry for crying victims and ask "bullies" to "pay up" even without anything most people regard as evidence. The lady is damaged and they felt sorry for her. So under "something happened" and "deep pocket theory" (look these terms up with you want to understand even more clearly) They just "voted" to make Trump pay. This is unfortunately how it works under tort law. Especially in the age of Critical Theory Social Justice Marxism. It's "cosmic justice" to have Trump pay even if the lady is a delusional liar for the same reason you Must Believe All Women unless they accuse a Marxist in good standing, and then you are a crazy person that needs to be locked up. See Hollywood rape and "casting couch" stories. What I heard is that George Conway approached this lady to politically weaponize her depraved "Believe All Women" stories with a lawsuit against Trump. Because Conway knows everything that I just explained. All law school students know about these doctrines whether or not they believe it's ethical to get involved like Conway did. It still pays. With all of these Critical Theory doctrines, they could even find Trump "liable" for defending himself truthfully yet in a way that hurt the bit ch's feelings AKA "psychological trauma" as "damage". The lawyers would have to come up with smoother, politically correct rhetoric, but some jurors no doubt knowingly went along with "Punching Up Social Justice" BS. Also, "partisan" jurors matter in EVERY trial these days, not just blatantly politician trials. Doctrinaire Marxists and Democrats (the same thing now) will effe up any jury. I'm sorry, that's the way it is now. Why would anyone vote for an elected prosecutor that runs on refusing to prosecute "petty" criminals (getting Social Justice against Capitalism)? I already explained it to you.
    1
  6.  @markiskool  He's a moronic liar.
    1
  7.  @jeffreyrudolph5061  "Not liable."
    1