Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Did they seriously think we wouldn't find this???? 😂" video.

  1.  @twm4259  No, it's not the opposite. You're partially correct but there is risk to any action to defend yourself from legitimate criminal racketeering charges. The deal is that Hunter was promising his family to write another book. Joe got the hint. Joe gave Hunter every reason to continue to lawyer up thus saving the family and the family fortune. Hunter can still lose everything if the money laundering and "foreign agent" income is adjudicated. Hunter still has zero motive to cooperate and pressures can be put on him in Congress. The same Congress that refused to Impeach any Democrat. The Clinton Impeachment was an own goal because his US AG started a process in order to clear up controversial "White Water" accusations and then Bill Clinton was caught perjuring himself in Federal court pertaining to a civil claim filed by one of the "bimbos" as Hillary calls them collectively. And by the way, if you look back in history, think about Al Capone and how he was finally prosecuted. Prosecuting crime racketeers is never a straightforward affair because the criminality itself is so massive that you can't realistically go through all of it in front of a jury. And if you only show limited segments then the criminal's "alternate theory" usually prevails. Hunter was just a lawyer and he forget to pay his income tax and some of it was loans and loan repayments and it's hard for crackheads to remember how to use their accounting software. I don't really remember where all the money went. The CCP funding was "seed money" that disappeared because, you know, fertilizer for transnational energy deals just disappears. Nobody can say where that CCP money went. And a few million from Ukraine? Cost of doing business. But anyway, normally RICO cases are handled by capturing the "low hanging fruit" and turning them against the next wave up until you get the "Godfather" or whatever. The Bidens, by accident, turned their bag man in to a laughingstock. The other family members covered their corrupt enterprises with the superficial skin of "charity" and "high rick economic development". The only one caught red handed with serious things like human trafficking was Hunter. But again, it's all OK because he was on crack. The only chance there is to prosecute the Bidens is if the House finishes their Impeachment case and turns it over to the DOJ. The DOJ would then subpoena the rest of the missing bank records and then you have a money laundering case that might fly because they don't even really need the perps to turn on each other in this case. The House already has enough evidence for a racketeering case based only on forensic accounting and a few witnesses to the key meetings. I think Trump should order the investigation and hold it until the end of his new term or hand it to the new MAGA President in the following term. Compare how they did the exact opposite to Trump. It can't be about "political" payback. But they are serious criminals and should be prosecuted legitimately. We don't need to take shortcuts.
    5
  2.  @twm4259  Did you vote for Hillary, Joe and Kammy? You think and write like a typical leftist.
    3
  3.  @twm4259  You not only failed to take any useful law classes but are very weak on the English language. This isn't the place to look for free tutoring.
    2
  4.  @twm4259  OP: @xxxlonewolf49 2 hours ago Hunter was pardoned to protect Joe, it's that simple. You: @twm4259 2 hours ago As noted elsewhere, it is exactly the opposite. Me: @indonesiaamerica7050 17 minutes ago @twm4259 No, it's not the opposite. You're partially correct but there is risk to any action to defend yourself from legitimate criminal racketeering charges. What confuses you? We all get it about the Fifth Amendment: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. -- So, there are "double jeopardy" protections and nobody can be forced to testify against themselves in a criminal case. This is also interpreted as NOT protecting witnesses who face no risk of "testifying against himself". That's fine. But it's not a magic bullet. Threatening a Pardoned criminal like Hunter with obstruction of justice for refusing to cooperate really only carries so much weight. It's no magic bullet. I'm pretty sure it's never been done. And "prosecuting" Hunter would be presented as "persecution" for the Marxist party. They'd love it. There are no magic bullets in weaponry nor in the law. The better strategy is as I explained above. You can't just seethe over something and then come up with shortcuts to slam people with in Federal courts. The crime families have created lots of loopholes for themselves. This reminds me of the Medici Popes but that's another story entirely.
    1
  5.  @FearsEdge  Without question. Plus the whole "drug addict" routine is also a clear signal not just for blame shifting to society from the perp but also constantly projecting that his testimony will never be reliable. It's not a new trick. But like I keep saying, we don't need any witness testimony that has not already been read in to the Congressional record. We just need additional bank records that the Bidens refused to supply because Joe held the US DOJ.
    1
  6.  @twm4259  You have so many awesome suggestions. Amazing.
    1
  7.  @twm4259  I wonder if you've ever heard of Freudian projection. Probably not. Or perhaps like all of the other Dunning Kruger arrogant ignoramuses you only think it applies to people that cause your own cognitive dissonance and you must of course assume the guilty party is always the one that triggers you. You're basically showcasing a wide array of stupid things that you want to throw out there that have no relevance to anything other than your own feelings of, uh, internal lack. Do you have anything remotely intelligent to say as we once expected of high school graduates?
    1
  8.  @thorild69  I agree but Trump should expect that none of the cases were legitimate. To find a legitimate "J6" prosecution would be really surprising to me. If they had caught even one person doing something serious that would have been on the leaked videos over and over again. And I have not heard of any specific cases worth looking in to as potentially serious. All of the talking head Marxists use mendacious statistics like "X deaths resulted from The Insurrection". Really? That's the best synopsis they have to defend the idea that a secret Insurrection happened? They also lay it on thick about the "transfer of power" that doesn't happen until the Inauguration. Basically, every single thing they all have said is based on blatant lies. I keep saying the most serious crimes that we know about were not taken to trial. The broken glass door and the alleged bomb. "Rioting" video can also be a crowd reacting defensively to police that were instructed to use hostile means to clear a nominally lawful assembly. I'm looking for contrary evidence, always. There is none to be found.
    1
  9. Trump is a Nazi for fighting the criminals legally. Biden is a hero because he's Fighting Fascism for the Arc of Social Justice History as outlined by MN Obama.
    1
  10.  @WikWar  You're correct. But the RINO's go along with it without the same "Teflon" protections. It won't defame the Demon Rats to turn on guys like Romney. The RINO's know the score. They're second tier fascists and they're allowed to make lots of corrupt money and generally avoid any problems but they're not "made" as in the inner circle of Mafiosi.
    1
  11. Yeah. But somehow the Marxists got Ford to "Pardon" Nixon categorically and since Nixon didn't actually break the law (Obama had many scandals worse than what Nixon was Impeached for) the Marxists can now claim almost whatever they want to. They are well-practiced liars. But what Joe Biden did really jumps the shark here because the criminal racketeering case evidence was already entered in to the Congressional record for the Biden Impeachment inquiry/hearings. And because we already know what the accusations are and Joe only alluded to a timeframe, it's obvious that Joe Biden is fully aware of how dangerous these accusations are to his family but he did not even specify any crime and only a period of time. But Pardons only can fall apart if someone is willing to challenge them in court. And as a practical matter, the guilty only need one crooked judge to regard it as double jeopardy. But calling it double jeopardy is weak unless the Pardon specifically mentions it. We're in uncharted territory and have been for a long time. The corruption gets worse and worse with each new Demon Rat President. Lincoln's greatest mistake was his "unity ticket" where instead of Impeachment insurance for a running mate he ran with a Demon Rat (Andrew Johnson) and the new stormtrooper division (KKK) for the new "Progressives" shot Lincoln and took over the White House. The only decent Democratic Party Presidents in the US since that time were Truman and JFK.
    1