Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "This guy takes it to a whole new level, lol." video.

  1.  @TuhljinTampergauge  No, it's much worse than that. Historically, Christians debated intent and potential to repent when applying "justice" under common law. What these despicable atheists are doing is parsing some of the rhetoric and reimagining "reality" behind all of the doctrines because they will appeal to all of these doctrines but not based on ability to repent but instead on their ability to indict "The Patriarchy" and our legal system is allegedly the root problem. This is taken directly from Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. Actually, Marx said that "all" institutions but dissolve. Marxists originally interpreted this as an ever expanding "international workers' revolution" but then between the end of WWI and the end of WWII (they yearn for worldwide wars and mourn when they end) they actually started "gaming out" what we now call Critical Theory. This was a way to fight a "total war" in accordance with developing conditions. IOW, they don't have much power worldwide. So they start to work on "soft power" and "the culture war". This is part of the culture war where they take traditional "defense lawyer" arguments and they become unhinged with the actual belief that the root problem is institutions based on the Ten Commandments. Including "though shalt not steal" and "though shalt not lie". If you don't believe me just read about the French Revolution and then Marx's related commentary. The French Revolution was driven mainly by Jacobinism. Marx took his reaction to Darwinism and applied it to, well, anything that he wanted to denounce. But he never mentioned Darwin himself, as far as I know. But anyway, that's a broad survey of how we got here. These people have made themselves crazy with "fact" dogmas that are sometimes unknowable and at other times blatantly false and insane. Marx also had his own version of "cognitive dissonance" where the "sanity test" was agreement with Marx. Seriously. These people are massively ignorant and get all of their ideas from insane ignoramuses imagining themselves in possession of "special enlightenment" or as they like to say since Michelle Obama (and Oprah), "woke".
    1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5.  @gooble69  First, the Western socialists do not believe in "democracy" of any kind. They believe in Orwellian "democracy" and the reason is crystal clear if you do enough research. Second, because of this, the "ruling class" has to posture and pontificate about "signals" and explicitly in place of clear, fact-based communication that "triggers the demos". They're self-deluded social engineering wannabes (since social engineering is itself inherently delusional). And what you get is the various nations' nominal leaders end up colluding with each other as "experts" on how to "rule the demos". From the streets it's easy to see where this delusion comes from. Basically, they're all cultural and or philosophical Marxists stuck in fact-free circular logic mode. And the national "globalist" leaders scheme about "best practices" somewhat in good faith in the sense that they all share the same delusions about "Realism". If you understand all of the "elite" doctrines that go completely unchallenged you understand exactly what they're doing. It's like game theory but they don't understand the limits of "game theory" thinking when applying to real life situations of any kind. When it comes to "cultural schisms" you also have the internal collectivists versus "unwoke" and the for at least 60 years these people have had this unchecked doctrine that they can solve every electoral and "working class" economic problem by, basically, population transfers that are "good" because they're not nominally coerced. Mass arrests and transfers would be coercive. Carpet bombing nations that you want to reengineer and then throwing open everyone's national borders is Social Justice Realism. They are ultimately protected by Social Darwinism which basically means there are no mistakes because they all self-correct by "selective pressures and survival of the fittest". You can even apply my critique to the "Pandemic" doctrines and policies we saw where China led the way in all things Covid. They're even trying it again exactly 4 years later. They're not even really hiding what they're doing. If they can force their lies and their critics can be censored from "social media" this is the final factor that makes Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm stories prophetic.
    1