Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "What exactly do they think this will accomplish...?" video.

  1. 9
  2. 7
  3. 7
  4. 6
  5. 1
  6.  @justice4USA  Hillary should not have been prosecuted had her only crime been the server fiasco. And you must understand what Comey alluded to under "No Reasonable Prosecutor" as discussed with his "leadership team". She should have been charged and given a suspended sentence. But she should have been required to turn over more documents from her CGI grift machine. People don't really understand the nature of her criminality. But another element is that what she did is illegal if done without Presidential approval. The sitting President is the "god" of all national security law. All of those statutes state what can happen without Presidential intervention or prior approval. The bigger picture is that the RINO's did not want to prosecute Hillary and did not want to Impeach Obama. They just wanted to bury the entire scandal. However, Trump should have ordered an investigation of CGI and all of the other ongoing racketeering scams and I think he will do that at least in part. Because the Biden and Clinton crime families approved all of this lawfare in order to protect themselves from prosecution. And look at all that they did just to protect their electoral power and to protect their ongoing criminal operations. That is the scandal right there. Putting Hillary in prison for the email scandal would have been legally righteous but that itself would have helped cover up the actual criminal racketeering much like charging Hunter Biden only reluctantly for lying on his Federal gun license application. It would put all of the other stuff out of reach because coming around to it later would then look like political persecution and it would be difficult to build the case. Things are different now but I don't know what Trump's aspirations are. Maybe firing everyone is enough for him. I think the Clintons and Bidens need to be charged criminally along with all of the legions of crooked lawyers that ran it all. It's the worse criminal conspiracy since the Confederacy gambit that ended with the assassination of Lincoln. They never pay for their crimes.
    1
  7. 1
  8. In theory this is a legitimate criminal RICO racketeering conspiracy. What you have to do is string together a bunch of actual crimes and show that they were planned by Democrats in power and around the country on coalition with foreign "agents" (of foreign states) and "actors" (what they call oligarchs if they want to demonize someone like that) and you're off to the races. What Trump can have Pam Bondi do is start getting convictions on some of the low hanging fruit and document the coordination. At some point you put it up on a "nexus" chart (like with Mafia investigations) and start prosecuting it like a RICO action. And that won't be hard because you also have Trump and Jan Sixers that have legitimate "Conspiracy Against Rights" claims that feed the "Corrupt Origination" element of RICO. TO answer your question by referring to the past, it's not possible. But when looking more broadly at RICO cases this one is ripe to get started. I think Giuliani was brought in to the inner Trump circle do advise on that sometime during his first term. See, once they gave up on the "Mueller" Special Counsel and pivoted towards an insane Impeachment trial that was solid prove of a party wide conspiracy to support and cover up what Obama started during Trump's first campaign. And then Comey carried it forth after Trump was sworn in. And the FBI agents tried to keep going and got on the "Special Counsel" train. These are clear proofs of illegal conspiracies against Trump's Constitutional rights (not to mention others). They're relying on various theories of immunity. LOL. But they later went to SCOTUS and claimed that even Trump has no special immunities. They've gone for broke and now this is so ripe for a solid RICO action. THAT is why they are sniveling in their corners in abject fear. Worst of all is that Jack Smith actually accused Trump of the same kind of conspiracy that Jack Smith was brought in to quarterback. IOW, they turned this in to a cross between lawfare and Thunderdome (Two Men Enter, One Man Leaves). In legal terms, Jack Smith (and others) are sitting on the floor and waiting to see if or when the executioner will show up. False advertising will not be one of the charges. These are in some cases capital crimes because some people did lose their lives as a consequences of this lawfare. That part is the most difficult to prove. But the death penalty is on the table for a case like this.
    1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1