Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "We just heard EXPLICITLY what their plan is..." video.

  1.  @ABD-pc3jf  That relies on a plain reading of the US Constitution.
    3
  2. That's fatalistic and dismissive. Why don't you run for Senate and help fix the problem?
    2
  3. Treason doth never prosper, what's the reason?
    1
  4. ​ @berto6050 He can fire any EB employee.
    1
  5.  @leonIdas002  They were created by Congress. The President's powers are always in dispute when you have Communists involved in the conversation. The game is to accuse Trump or any other lawful President of a "High Crime" any time they want to do something the Communists don't accept. So, the main problem is that DC is full of deranged, lying Communists. Heck, they even sent a Stalinist DOJ hack to SCOTUS for oral arguments in favor of "DOJ" powers to govern the sitting President. That's how Obama is OK to send a drone to assassinate an unarmed US Citizen motorist (travelling overseas) because he was on the naughty list. The DOJ Politburo approved it. That's what this moron stated to the panel of SCOTUS Justices.
    1
  6.  @Kelnx  This is a lot to digest at one time but we need to review some major problems with this "born fascist" party. WRT your premise, basically, as a Citizen, Trump must file Civilian RICO petitions. And then these crimes and tort claims must be taken up by the DOJ. That's only phase I and should have happened already. And that is precisely why Rudy Giuliani was targeted just as hard as Trump himself. Even before the bogus election tampering and FISMA violations pertaining to elections for Federal offices were discussed. As President, he can order Federal RICO investigations as well but not under the same doctrines where Trump is both President and complainant. Because the crimes committed by these agencies fall under Deprivation of Rights Under The Color of Law. The most controversial but technically legal thing he can do is order DOJ investigations of all of this malfeasance already documented in Investigator General reports and in some Special Counsel reports. Those are all actionable. That would get the ball rolling in prosecuting individual criminals and then once conspiracies are proven you expand it in to RICO. What you really don't want to do is claim that "Government" or even "Agencies" are "Corrupt Organization". And it's not even necessary. The corrupt "parent" organization is the DNC. That's a fact and it's easy for the public to understand. You want to get all of the criminals and you want the power to get all of the evidence. Shutting down agencies is still, in the end, up to Congress. But Presidents hold all of the Constitutional power. So he can, in theory, rectify all of these problems while sitting in office and then long term funding and "powers" must go through legislation. But you allude to another problem and that is the creeping authority these agencies have taken for themselves that has been validated by poorly constructed lawsuits against certain rulings rather than having a big picture lawsuit before SCOTUS that asks for a sweeping ruling of the same scope as reversing Roe v. Wade. Some of these Progs understand the threat of this abrogation and it is only tangentially related to abortion for them. These legal doctrine problems with Federal "agencies" date back to FDR's "brain trust" cult. The slavers relied heavily on States' rights arguments but then created their own "Confederacy". OK. What happened immediately after the war is that Lincoln tapped Andrew Johnson as a "good Democrat" for his VP. Fine. But then Lincoln was shot and these scumbags fought everything Lincoln fought for that they could possibly reverse. They championed "labor rights" as a way to control unions that would control "the kneegraws" and they held the White House almost right away. So their arguments for States' rights (or any other "rights") were always conditional pertaining to what was good for this evil cult that runs this political party since Andrew Jackson.
    1
  7.  @leonIdas002  FDR created them through Congressional legislation under "New Deal" doctrines that included a "War on SCOTUS" and threats to pack the courts. The biggest threat that Progressives perceive is Justices like Thomas and Alito. Especially when the others start to follow their thinking. Kennedy plus Trump's picks are all fair weather Constitutionalists that need to find their spines. The 3 Communist Justices are useless at best and dangerous to the republic at worst.
    1
  8.  @mc512tr  DEI is selling the idea of Marxist "equality". So it's not really about "equality" but about giving centralized power to take anything they want from their enemies and claim any power that they want in order to appease Utopian expectations that are indoctrinated in all voters through compulsory K-12. The shorter version is that the Master\Servant of the plantation "labor" paradigm has been replaced by the Marxist "two class" paradigm. That actually has a third "soviet" class to issue Social Justice decrees.
    1
  9. Biden or Trump?
    1