Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "She turned into a stuttering FOOL when asked this question!!" video.

  1. US energy policy is without question, from top to bottom, all about empowering hostile regimes and allowing China to run a global mercantilist, centrally planned pricing arbitrage scheme. I'm not saying all US politicians knowingly cooperate and agree with the end game. But one thing about Bush that surprised me was before he even ordered the attack on Iraq and budgets went up for GWoT he allowed US oil prices to go up and didn't do much of anything to help keep retail costs down. This led to a lot of struggles that ended with the banking collapses and "junk loans" that turned to dust. It's just a fact that US Congressional spending and "economic planning" since Clinton relied on the US being "Post Industrial" and everyone just thought that The Internet transformed the US Economy in to something that (Marxist) materialists had always yearned for. The magic AI robots would run everything for free with green energy distributed through superconductor yada yadas meant that the key to future prosperity would be more abortion, keep the displaced workers from rioting and so forth. It's pretty insane but since everyone always had "war" and "terrorism" to talk about they had to couch it in terms of "winning the Global War on Terrorism" on the road to peace and prosperity. But all of the "visionaries" and "thought leaders" for "nation building" were neo-Marxist kooks. IOW, this pattern mentioned in the video (shutting down US oil to spike retail pricing) is more obvious today than before but this is actually what we started doing even before the "nation building" phase. I remember this conversations very clearly because Congress at taht time passed the Homeland Security Act and started spending like crazy with stupid budget deficits taht it seemed like they regarded as a feature rather than a problem that needed to be solved. This fit with everything I had been taught about Marxists vision of "redistribution" through social programs AND intentionally spiking inflation that "the rich" don't suffer from because their land values also rise (in theory). Until you can no longer pay the loans off. And I think even at that time in the Clinton and Bush epoch that most if not all in DC just thought it was "inevitable" that China would "rise" and that meant what? It depends on your worldview. For Marxist materialists wealth complies with the laws of thermodynamics. It's like market share where markets don't really contract or expand. China can only rise if we fall down and meet them half way or something like that. And that is precisely why this war on the middle class is something that they deny in public but also believe is inevitable. They don't believe taht "the one percent" took from the poor. They believe that high GDP per capita middle class workers steal constantly from the poor. Never mind that it is China that has the most forced labor camps. It seems like a lot of Marxists, including those in the US are not only OK with it but expect it in "late capitalism" as the only way to "solve disparity". You all have to come to grips with the fact that Joe Biden is not really the cause of this. It's his treasonous party. The Bidens are not even the biggest traitors. Just the most famous/notorious. And everyone on the left LOVES when the CCP controls US politics. I have been for years looking for contrary evidence and I have none.
    1