Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Did anyone else see this?" video.

@rachdarastrix5251 Judge others as you would have others judge you. That's the command. Because God asked you to and he's paying attention. That's why. If you don't believe God is watching and God asked you to do it you won't really understand any of the "rules" at all. Because you're always naturally creating internal Special Pleading fallacies.
1
@rachdarastrix5251 Let me be clearer. Humans are not gods in that they are not omniscient nor omnipotent. That is the God of the Bible. You can accept Biblical theories or reject them but it's important that you are clear on the theories and implications. So, what happens with people that are not clear on this is they tend to want to convince themselves of their place philosophically and so forth. God can also mean "highest" authority and only monotheists are explicit about omniscience and omnipotence. When it's not clear what the theories are it's natural to man to want to compare himself to others but not look at the standards outlined in the same book that described the omniscient and omnipotent God of the universe. And then you get fuzzy about what it means to be good and kind and so forth. Internally, you sort of view yourself as a special case by reason of the fact that it's only you talking about you (to yourself). Nobody to help you with small errors that pile up. Freudian psychology attempts to help with this by suggesting a process for "objectivity" but the built in assumption is that all theistic philosophies are based on blatant lies and the reason why so many people can't cope with theists and their institutions. And according to atheists all "life" is driven by selfish interests. Altruism is supposedly fraudulent because it's allegedly based on the idea that God himself will reward all of the "good" sacrifices that you make. Altruism is yet another delusion, they believe. OK, so you're supposed to be selfish. If you are in charge of making your own case for you that means you can't really judge others as you would have them judge you. Because that is their job. What you're supposed to do is avoid being "sociopathic" or deleterious to society. But who makes that standard? LOL And that in a nutshell is why "Transactivists" are going insane and shooting Christians and so forth. Plus a lot of related genocidal movements. Special Pleading fallacy is when you present an argument, theory or premise that X is a special case when it really isn't. Atheists do this all the time on the idea that theists are morons and they are both enlightened and persecuted by faith of others. See Freud again if I lost you. Even "Special Snowflake Syndrome" has two distinctly different meanings depending on whether or not you believe dogmatically in Darwinism.
1
@zeuso.1947 Prove by what standard? Preponderance of the evidence? Or "lab test" proof? Because if you want to go there we can all hold you to the exact same standard. The best you can come up with as a rational skeptic is agnosticism. Just admit that you don't know. Don't try to say you have special insight in the dogmatic believe that all life evolved from "primordial soup" or that in spite of the law of biogenesis that you believe the only plausible explanation is abiogenesis. In spite of all of the evidence to the contrary, you believe in abiogenesis. And if you don't believe in abiogenesis where do you think life came from? Cite any evidence of any laws that can explain abiogenesis or your "common sense" atheism that puts the entire burden on theists. Even though you have extensive testimonies through history that you simply explain as "delusion". But it can't be your delusion. The logic behind your demand is stupid.
1