Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Fox News" channel.

  1.  @timthomson7532  Speak English much?
    11
  2.  @nandy1256  You obviously don't know how anything works.
    11
  3. None of these are his ideas. He can barely get through his talking points (handed to him).
    11
  4. He's crazy. He's always been like this. Not one serious word has ever come from his mouth that I know of.
    11
  5.  @dennislawrence8501  How old are you?
    11
  6.  Investigative Audit  Racism isn't the root of anything. Racism is taught. Racism is just about fear and blame-shifting from people taught to make excuses for their own failures. Nationalism is a root of evil? It's the number one enabler for self-rule. I think you don't know enough about history to comment on this. Selfishness? Sure, but that depends on what you mean, precisely. The solution is the golden rule.
    11
  7. Both absolute idiots as Senators, both climbed the ranks the same way as well.
    11
  8.  @moritsune1502  Your math is OK but your logic needs work. The 6-year-old in this thread must be you
    11
  9.  @shozykelly3238  Where did you go to school? Or do I assume too much with my question?
    11
  10.  @davidblasko2159  Do you even know how to respond like an adult taking part in adult conversations?
    11
  11. ​ @turnerfamilyinozi Try to pay attention to the relevant facts.
    11
  12. At least you can throw your Pet Rock through a window once its "market value" vanishes.
    10
  13.  @robertthacher2660  He's not confused. He's an abject ignoramus. He doesn't know enough about anything to understand anything aside from reading the script.
    10
  14.    You people love saying blatantly stupid things. I guess it's nothing more than a form of woke virtue signaling.
    10
  15. The "host" was peddling nonstop "nonpartisan" lies.
    10
  16. @Trumpsucks-hn7oh  LOL. You don't even know what Psychiatry is.
    10
  17.  @melanies.6030  LOL. Tell us your reasoning. Can you understand that 4 word sentence?
    10
  18. The best way to hold all of these criminals accountable is through RICO statutes. Once that gets rolling it's very difficult for the criminals to use Congressional immunity and so forth to protect themselves.
    10
  19.  @andrelotscher280  Bribery, racketeering and treason.
    10
  20. He seems personable but that man has a lot of agitprop-created demons in his mind. Many bogeymen to slay, that one has...
    10
  21.  @marycincinnati1604  Uh huh. I'm sure you're not sitting on your rear end with a union-protected sinecure.
    9
  22.  @francesreed2203  Liberal technology. You should learn how to read the dictionaries, idiot.
    9
  23.  boofer5570  Nobody has ever been indicted like Trump. And you think that makes your cult special. You're special alright.
    9
  24.  @nathanolson3135  So, you're an expert, eh? What do you think 'socialism' is? Read the Communist Manifesto before you embarrass yourself.
    9
  25.  @randomstuff3201  Harold is smoother. And he's not a typical leftist trigglypuff. Jessica cries too easily. She's the AOC of big media pundits.
    9
  26.  @JCB576  Who "staged" what? The event was on the calendar and the lady contacted some students that she regularly organizes events with. They went to the scheduled "staged" event together. Is that what you're talking about? And who cares about your attempt to diminish what everyone saw on the video?
    9
  27. ​ @cameraman655 And you are, who?
    9
  28.  @scottp5588  I think you missed most or all of them because you have no actual citation to use.
    9
  29.  Justin TimberFlake  You obviously don't know what either indict or republic mean.
    9
  30.  @willzresurreccion6745  Whoever taught you English did us a big favor, Commie.
    9
  31.  @martinmetz702  The appointees do not follow their sworn leader according to the Constitution. The careerists with seniority and union protection call all of the shots.
    9
  32.  @henrybutchy3242  No, he wrote that it's not illegal. It does not fit a legally enforceable definition for torture. Get it? The law is not about your feelings. But more importantly he wrote that the Geneva Convention and "laws of war" apply only to lawful combatants. IOW, unlawful combatants are not protected by these treaties.
    9
  33.  @chrisjames3087  On what crime is your particular fantasy built on? State the common law term or the relevant criminal statute.
    9
  34.  @nadia0701  Do you have a link to this document so we can look at "page 302"?
    9
  35. Dr Quakquak  He has done more than any other President to restore liberty unless you count Reagan's dealings with the Soviets. It's only debatable for that reason. Reagan and Trump are cleaning up after FDR's mistakes. So there's that. But Unskilled and Unaware morons don't understand anything while pontificating on everything that enters their nearly-empty brains.
    8
  36.  @marycincinnati1604  Have you ever held a job?
    8
  37.  @honestdon1772  You're as smart as Broom Hillary and Broom Kamala.
    8
  38.  @t.n.-js6ei  Citation needed. "Attempt to assist is underway." LOL.
    8
  39. You are correct. We need a US President that believes our prosperity is premised on liberty under the rule of law. That means equal application of the law. Having all of these Federal agencies makes the rule of law impossible. We live under "rule of bureaucrats" in the same way the British ran their country with Regency Councils when the official monarch was too young or whatever. This is more or less what Communist regimes do except that Communists don't hold elections but do have a visible totalitarian monarch of the kind the British never had (unless you count Longshanks or some of these belligerent kooks).
    8
  40.  @keyfield8967  Any "group" that has standards has rules for deciding who meets the standards. "Credentialed" doesn't mean anything other than formally approved by the esoteric group that issues certificates of such. It has the same meaning as "certified election". Basically, it means nothing in any objective sense. It means the group has vetted you. The next question is do we trust the group making the claim? What does "expert academic" mean, for example? How good are Jill Biden's credentials?
    8
  41.  @studebakerhoch4397  You don't even know what "far right" means, never mind what "racist" means. And I agree with you that Trump triggered you Jacobin racists like nothing since Lincoln.
    8
  42. That's why they were in the garage next to the car Joe shared with Hunter, his bag man. And the so called "Laptop from Hell" contained "intel" in an email to his Ukrainian clients/handlers that seems to be extracted from classified CIA documents but was not quite verbatim.
    8
  43.  @gregoryuschold3870  That in and of itself is a stupid talking point. That "promise" was made when the Soviet Union was still standing. That promise was made in early 1990 and the Soviet Union voted to dissolve almost 2 years later. The expansion of "NATO" after that stage was stupid as the whole theory of NATO was defending against Soviet Communist expansionism. Having said that, it's none of Russia's business who joins any treaties that it is not itself involved in. To sum it all up, this is a dumb talking point for Russians. But it certainly points out the fact that we have no business interfering in Russian-Ukrainian bilateral disputes. Everyone seems to be stupid. The best talking point that Russia has is US and EU interference in Ukrainian elections as they seemed to be promoting anti-Russian politics in domestic Ukrainian electoral politics. This is very bad and this cabal in US "government" is the same one that torments its own Citizens and joints with European leftist parties (and the EU itself) to try to turn all "democratic" politics toward Fabian Communism. Nobody can better understand what I wrote than Xi and Putin because it is Communist academics that sort of promoted these talking points and philosophies over the years starting around the time FDR and Stalin got together (almost a century ago) to "defend democracy" against Stalin's enemies. Notice how Stalin was a key "defender of democracy" in this US sponsored political project.
    8
  44. No, it means the ones sworn to enforce the law are lawless criminals.
    8
  45. @Cony Budding LOL. I feel sorry for you clueless lemmings. They're still trying to cover up Clinton and Obama's corruption. Trump didn't do anything close to breaking any laws. Not even close. You're unfit to comment but that doesn't mean you'll stop.
    8
  46.  @hederahelix622  Trump's exposition is not very good but yours is much worse. How can a citizen "terminate" the Constitution as you describe?
    8
  47. They want to control all fonts of power. They have already short circuited checks and balances by using Democrat Party doctrines to solve all "conundrums". Like "No Reasonable Prosecutor yada yada yada" because it's Hillary. How does that make any sense to anyone? It doesn't even make sense to Comey. He just took it as an article of faith that careerists in the DOJ that were elevated by Bill Clinton would not steer him wrong on Hillary's malfeasance. He wrote a book titled "A Higher Loyalty" and never quite explained it. He swore on oath to the Constitution but his higher loyalty is to some esoteric Progressive explanation of how Our Democracy works. But anyway, they want to ensure single party rule and then consolidate all power in the nation's capital. That way they can have "minority" parties to make it seem "democratic" but the party itself never has to answer to anyone outside of the party. They're Communists. Leninists, to be precise.
    8
  48.  @suebryant-q7o  Kammy can't think. At all.
    8
  49. She is a witch, for sure.
    8
  50.  @SteamvilleQuintet  Little John doesn't understand Freudian projection.
    8