General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Fox News
comments
Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Fox News" channel.
Previous
4
Next
...
All
@TBrl8 Repeating your cult's lies isn't effective. We know your mendacious cult's dogmas. They're easy to memorize. That dean's convert your dogmatic claims in to "facts".
6
Better than Trump at what?
6
@barbgetman6471 LOL. What do you have against RFK Junior?
6
@reliablereindeer Neither should have been charged for "campaign" or accounting violations. Same with that other (Democrat Party Presidential candidate) dude that hid his pregnant mistress and funded it all from campaign contributions. That's the most egregious example.
6
@sprinkleddonuts6094 Kammy's Fables.
6
We're talking about shared borders and shared responsibilities. What a foolish comment from you. At least you made yourself laugh.
6
@jasonbarnett7747 One thing that everyone can see is that you post garbage that any child could type.
6
@dmercury292 It's funny to have morons pretend to troll "Trumptards" by displaying abject ignorance pertaining to how the US Federal government works.
6
@Yves_Ka When do you expect to start your high school career?
6
@@Mustang0685He doesn't even know what he wrote.
6
@1133saginaw Just stop lying or move to China.
6
@goodgrief1163 Absolutes exist only in mathematics and theoretical sciences. They exist nowhere else in US jurisprudence. Biden is peddling yet another stupid straw man. That's basically his entire life's mission. Well, his mission is to get paid to deceive.
6
@gloriasteele7938 Use snide remarks to distract from your abject ignorance. Nobody has ever seen that before. Especially from a doctrinaire socialist idiot like you.
6
Be patient. I would not expect them to prosecute Comey at this stage. He's on the hook for enabling (at the very least) the worst of the worst schemes. That investigation is still in the middle stages. These SNAFU leaks and mishandling definitely could be handled as unlawful acts of Espionage, but because it's SNAFU and because of the criminal conspiracy to protect Hillary and then attack Trump (to defend themselves after they failed to pick the winning horse) the focus on Comey's actions with his classified notes, leaks and so forth really just clearly answer the question as to whether Trump was right to fire him. The serious crimes are still being examined and the prosecution is still putting together a strategy to catch all of these losers. Only then can we deal with the corrupt elitist culture in DC, focusing on the DOJ on down, once the investigation and it's case(s) is more or less ready to present to a jury (if needed).
6
There's a difference between being "incorrect" and incompetent and/or delusional. His aspirations as such are fine. Also, Trump's record on the environment is excellent. Climate change drama is a bullshit way of reversing the need for evidence-based solutions. You must agree to their premises and hand them money and power and then they will some day hope to prove that their concerns and solutions are rational. Trump's guidance on "the environment" is to focus on things that clearly work and leave as much control to the States as possible.
6
@christyann1201 What planet are you from?
6
@LVLexus Logic fail. You don't know anything that's true.
6
@Kamgolf The thing is that the sane people are supposed to watch the trial to understand the outcome and that gives them a chance to respond rationally. Here, the video feeds are used by lying propagandists in corporate media to further incite and indoctrinate people against "the system" in favor of Communist revolution. These are de facto foreign agents doing the bidding of Communist China (although most of these radical institutions were set up originally by Soviets with American dupes and traitors).
6
@jevriend4992 An idiot like you doesn't even understand its own lexicon.
6
It's designed to backfire.
6
@RobRando927 Stalinists hate dissidents and proud Capitalists are the worst of the worst, as far as Communists are concerned.
6
And what about Senator Lurch running around in gym clothes? That's Democratic Dignity or what?
6
@kairidon3363 Nope.
6
@donaldpump8882 He made no such categorical statement. Why don't you quote your source, liar?
6
Fred Freddy10 hours ago "Wow. The denials from the right are getting crazy." Denying what?
5
"Russia intervened in election = no evidence" You're right and wrong. The Russians did not do anything that they have not been working on for about 100 years. There was nothing special about this cycle. And usually, the Democrats are literally colluding with the Russians. We know that Carter, as a sitting President, and Ted Kennedy, both reached out to the Soviets for help with their presidential elections, even while there were proxy wars raging all around the globe. "Assad committing atrocities = debatable, more like (until recently) US and Saudi funded ISIS rebels committing the atrocities and trying to create another Libya" Agreed. I'm not defending Russia but I'm not going to defend any of the other liars either.
5
@maclennylucas2248 Exactly. They know the rules more than anyone else.
5
@pefo1674 Liar.
5
Doctrinaire appeals to "fair share" with no principles to guide those being preached to is Fabian Communist socialism. Biden doesn't even have any philosophy or principles to think about his own rhetoric (provided by speech writers).
5
@g.p.b. If you revisit what they're taught in K-12 this should come as no surprise. And it gets worse in the colleges.
5
@timothywright778 "On what grounds would you prove that the judge is part of a conspiracy?" You don't know how the law is enforced, obviously. You first file your complaint and cite probable cause evidence. That allows you to get related subpoenas. "Can you even name the crime you would indict the Judge for? " Under RICO it's a foregone conclusion that once the Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law criminal and civil petitions are filed that there will be a long list of people subject to subpoena and in some cases to arrest. "I suppose you think Trump should sue the jurors if things don't go his way." You suppose. LOL. I doubt any jurors will get named but it's possible that the first round of subpoenas will net some evidence pertaining to jury tampering. You need probable cause, a criminal complaint, or a civil "cause of action" to get rolling on this criminal cabal that you try to hard to protect. I should also mention that you're either a dogmatic Communist or you have no actual idea about the history of the US Democratic Party.
5
@Memphis2010GFC Like throwing pasta against the wall. Al dente doesn't stick to the wall. But you do have quite a few improperly cooked noodles to make a big stink about. Congratulations, troublemaker.
5
@jonny1982py Explain your random dig.
5
@listlessvessels5Xi is your leader.
5
@wackywarrior001 Where did you go to school?
5
Juan is totally nuts. He hasn't made any sense for several years now.
5
Gone to Stalinism.
5
@michaelcarr7170 It's everywhere but some are worse than others. No doubt. The first target of the Marxists, long ago, was launched "right to public school" and infesting law schools with radical students who then took over teaching positions and the judiciary. It's a fairly new thing to get Marxists in power as prosecutors but that's how ridiculous it's gotten. The rot in the military academies took quite some time but we seem to have as many rotten prosecutors as we have rotten military officers.
5
@ricopedrajrs It's a cult.
5
@mr.sinjin-smyth Silent working majority. They have better things to do than to run off the the latest protest to livestream.
5
@keyfield8967 Their credentials are worthless.
5
They had more than two years to prepare "the case" against anyone. They had control of all the video and the accused had zero rights to defend or respond in any way in the official hearings and therefore in corporate media as well. They couldn't even put together even a few minutes of video of anyone doing anything criminal other than breaking the glass and that was probably done by an ANTIFA agent provocateur, coordinated by the FBI. But even if they're all innocent of trying to foment the riot the riot itself was not even on the level of any ANTIFA "peaceful protests" or even a freaking Superbowl brawl. It looked to me in all of the "violent" videos that people were trying to repel antiriot munitions and batons and we're just to assume that those were justified. That's some amazing circular logic. And we're supposed to trust the "Putin's Puppet" storytellers in all cases. LOL. Please. I know that if they had any compelling video at all that it would be the first thing to go out before the riot even ended. They have nothing but their totally unsupported lies. Not just "difference of opinion" like who actually broke the glass. All of the people that were charged seemed to be innocent of any actual crimes and some did plead to "illegal parading" and other insane deals. That's it. These people are beyond redemption in politics. They must be chased from power and completely ostracized if not banished to Elba for life.
5
Prosecute Trump for what? What's your learned theory? Disrupting the Peaceful Transition of Power? What day was that, exactly?
5
@mattjacks0n83 That's not "whataboutism". Sheesh!
5
Remember that little detail when you here Bill Barr starting to sound like Liz Chaney on the talk soup circuit.
5
@nowshipping Marxist humor is rarely funny the way you meant it to be.
5
I like Turley but he should get to root causes when they're so obvious. The whole "speech rights on campus" has never, ever been properly parsed in public. First of all, teachers have "speech rights" but not on campus. If colleges defend erroneous teachers on their campuses they should not be censored. They should be decertified. End of story for employees. Now the students have even less "speech rights" while on a credentialed campus. They don't like it? They can lobby to change whatever aggrieves them to legislatures and so forth and if they don't like the way the school is operating they can find another one. And if that doesn't work out best to decertify them, just as above. People in private clubs can say whatever they want. These schools with taxpayer support and Federal credentials (LOL) want to have it both ways. They want to show they are the avant garde or Vanguard Party elites while also reserving the right to throw hissy fits at any moment. This only makes sense under some kind of Fabian Communism where nobody actually has any rights. And you can see from this disaster election cycle we had in 2020 that the public doesn't even understand what "certify" means other than some kind of magical sacrament. Certification puts the burden of proof on the one submitting the thing that has been certified. It's not a fiat decree. But it is now. And actually this is what they did with Obama's Birth Certificate. I'm not even saying he's not a "natural born citizen". I'm saying the way that they handled the debates established that they can just "certify" something from the bowels of some Democratic Party stronghold and challenged Obama was already racist in 2009 (per Jimmy Carter) and by the time Obama published that "certified facsimile" on the White House web site critical thinking in public had itself because "white supremacy" according to these kooks.
5
@Call_Me_Troy Be careful what college classes you enroll in. That's where it started.
5
@Based F It's not just how to pay. It's also not spending on what they say. Even if they raise taxes to balance the budget it's still a drain on GDP under the best of conditions. They're trying to establish a new kind of "post industrial" society where only a few people must work and the rest are involved in "white collar" things like accounting and so forth and then you have a millions of government workers and "privatized Artificial Intelligence" provided by Google and Microsoft. That's what they think the future holds. They're just trying to make sure "the working class" (of their minds) get some of the action before the End of History state of Communist Utopia arrives. This is what they think even if they change the stories around. This is what these morons expect to happen and they seem themselves not as agents of change but as agents of the oppressed. They're like slip and fall (low rent tort) lawyers. Actually, add the Marxist worldview and that is very precisely what all of them are.
5
You're quite the critical thinker. I love how you explain your reasoning.
5
Previous
4
Next
...
All