Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks" video.

 @evertvdb000 Go for it, pseudoscholar.
21
@evertvdb000 What do you call it when someone uses "fallacy" tropes in response to simple comments? The fascinating thing to me is that he first alluded to uncertainty theory in the sciences, which actually does exist in human knowledge. There's no debate, actually. Nobody thinks humans are omniscient. And nobody, ever, has said that because you can't prove there is no god that god must exist. Nobody. You're peddling silly, fallacious tropes. If you actually want to expand your knowledge and reduce your own uncertainty you should work on learning how to do so in conversations because people that think and write like you do can't properly learn or explain anything in the sciences or even in a court of law. You're just endlessly confusing yourself and your comrades and fellow travelers. You're lost in your own pseudo-authoritative ignorance. And seeing the irony in that would help you quite a bit.
2
@evertvdb000 You're a Dunning Kruger ignoramus with nothing to contribute. QED
1
@evertvdb000 again: "i reacted to this claim: humans cannot know everything, there is something greater than us. this is the prime example of the logical fallacy called 'the argument from ignorance'. get it?" Your claim is inherently fallacious. Argument from ignorance is when you use lack of evidence as an argument that the opposite proposition must be true. Again, uncertainty theory is a real thing for "top logicians" to understand. You're the opposite of "top logician". Uncertainty theory was NOT offered as evidence of God, you idiot. The OP was not even offering a formal argument. The logic behind his comment was that his father was a Professor in physics and that he believes in God. If you want to understand the logic behind what he wrote you should just ask him. This isn't a formal debate and nobody tasked anyone here with offering an argument for you Dunning Kruger morons to rebut. And for those of you that can read with ordinary proficiency, bragging that you don't read well is not convincing to anyone but your fellow cultists. In physics, scientists are well aware of the difficulties that pseudoscientific lunatics have in trying to show how "science" discredits theistic texts' testimonies and historicity. And saying there is something greater than humanity is self evident. Are you doing to tell me that humans created the universe, or what is the logic behind your low IQ rhetoric?
1
@evertvdb000 "Do'nt ever bother me again with that." You must love the US Democratic Party.
1
@thomastaylor6699 The "6 calendar days" claim is problematic and not rooted in any kind of rational logic other than trying to read everything as miraculous. If everything is miraculous then nothing is miraculous. So the testimonies are themselves useless. The New Testament itself exhorts you to always be prepared with "reasons for your faith". That's not reasoning. It's recitation of dogma.
1
@FuKuntt Magic funding theory.
1
@FuKuntt How many pages did they promise?
1
@seanblankenship5404 On your authority. LOL. Who gains from the war of attrition in Ukraine. Explain in one sentence.
1
@evertvdb000 Triggered!
1
@mahbriggs The thing is that if Russia was involved with Hunter in any way, that simply expands the scope of the investigation of this treasonous crime family.
1
@pefo1674 What secret knowledge do you have to share?
1