Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Mark Levin: We are moving toward a Democratic-run police state" video.

  1.  @hederahelix622  Trump's exposition is not very good but yours is much worse. How can a citizen "terminate" the Constitution as you describe?
    8
  2.  @hederahelix622  Liar.
    5
  3.  @hederahelix622  You stated that you quoted him verbatim. I already pointed out that you lied.
    3
  4.  @lordbread2083  You wouldn't even know how to validate your own claim. Zero evidence is all you know.
    2
  5.  @1133saginaw  Meaning what, exactly?
    2
  6.  @pefo1674  You obviously don't have any idea what you're talking about.
    2
  7.  @richardbreur8862  Both claims are true. The Demon Rat party wants to defund local police (currently under local control) and put their own DC-controlled Federal police in charge of all. A police state is a state where the executive branch has complete control over the unified "national" or "state" police. Not to be confused with any of the 50 States under US nomenclature.
    1
  8.  johnnynotenglish9751  Explain your reasoning, moron.
    1
  9.  johnnynotenglish9751  Moron, You have no idea what you're even talking about.
    1
  10.  johnnynotenglish9751  You don't even know what scientific evidence is. You effing moron. You're just a raving lunatic.
    1
  11.  @vincegoupil  Who violated the US Constitution on January 6th? Be specific. First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
    1
  12.  @mrrey8937  Most that were arrested for "illegal parading" had their First Amendment rights abrogated right then and there. Read the First Amendment. How can it be illegal to protest in a public area of Congress as they assemble to debate the EC and associated controversies? Especially after COVID lockdowns that showed blatant political bias as BLM and ANTIFA riots were literally protected by the police and these guys with legitimate "political" grievance could not lawfully assemble for to lobby Congress? How insane are you people? Do you even know how to read and properly interpret ordinary English?
    1
  13.  @daysrcdays  Congress can't write any new laws to force US AG to enforce Federal law properly. The House can Impeach but the Senate must remove. Nor can they write any new laws to force Governors to do a better job. The only thing that can happen is that a reformed DOJ can investigate lousy State and local law enforcement and prosecution for "deprivation of rights" by enabling the criminals as they are now. That is possible. But it must come from the President and US AG or from your own State. WRT the border...dude, you need to join the "anyone but a Democrat" movement. Tusli Gabbard was very, very late to the party. But she is now doing what I suggested about her many years ago. She proved to be a "good Democrat" by categorically denouncing the party. Join her.
    1
  14.  @pefo1674  I already read it in its full context. It's clear what he's objecting to but not what he expects anyone to do going forward. Any sentient person can understand that we're already in a "Constitutional crisis" and have been since the Covid pandemic was used to defraud the electorate in many ways. And that was only to cover up the malfeasance that started under Obama at the hands of Clinton's DOJ and CIA cronies. In my view the criminals must resign and Congress could then hold honest hearings on what has happened. But the criminals don't see themselves as that. They see themselves as (Machiavellian) winners. Ideologs see power accumulation as the only essential ingredient for "justice" as they view it. These are some of history's most deluded traitors that I've ever heard of. They're still fully immersed in this criminal racketeering and treason sanctified only by the fact that it's working for them.
    1
  15.  @elbarjones4812  That's the most ignorant and mendacious comment on this page. Keep trying. Trump violated zero laws. Trump followed lawful presentation of grievances. Not only that he was the sitting President at the time and he didn't even leverage his official power in any way at all. You people are so effing stupid. What have you learned in the nearly 2 years since that stupid chapter of your Marxist struggle began? Nothing?
    1
  16.  @elbarjones4812  LOL. I'm fully familiar with your insane cult's mendacious talking points.
    1