Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Gregg Jarrett: James Comey committed a crime" video.

@dougfunk7506 You start with the documentary evidence and see if they try to lie.
3
The judge can only do so much to throw the verdict. The number one priority in a case like this is to force evidence and the defendant's responses in to the public record. Now the public can read and decide for themselves what to think of these claims when they've obviously each put forth their best legal arguments for each phase of this ground up RICO prosecution (although nobody has explicitly invoked RICO yet, that I know of). This is also playing out in the context of a RICO style investigation and prosecution. They catch the small fish first to start to bring out the threats to the rest of the criminal conspirators. The idea is that some of the middle players will feel threatened enough to cooperate before they're charged. The other thing is that the public itself starts to change how it feels about the players and these organizations. They have to adapt to survive. And if they're taken out of power (losing seats, getting fired from the Federal agencies, and losing majorities and so forth) that makes it easier to start changing the nature of Congressional hearings and paves the way for reform of the DOJ and so forth. This happens in "baby steps" as Durham's project moves up the org chart. You have to be very, very patient and make sure you're also supporting the right elected officials to keep this kind of steady and calculated "rule of law" pressure on. I can think of ten scoundrels or more, by name, between Sussman and Hillary Clinton that thought they dodged a bullet but now see that they are in significant legal jeopardy.
2