Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Tyrus: It’s ‘clever’ what RFK, Jr. did" video.

The tradition that comes from the British is the Parliament with the de facto CEO being selected by the Parliament, not direct elections like we have. The Electoral College sort of emulates that but because the EC doesn't have a bunch of diverse parties to take to the Joint Session (because States taht did this under the status quo would fear losing influence) they don't have debates and negotiations. And this idea is that the Joint Session must open and close the same day. Progs even claim that it's merely ceremonial and that if you allow debate your Destroying Our Democracy. But what happened with RFK Jr. could and should lead to more diverse parties that campaign like RFK and then decide if they want to join one side or the other all while running campaigns for Congressional seats at the same time. The "two party system" seems to have no head to change the status quo. This is because the slavery issue was so serious that all of the antislavers consolidated behind the Republican Party and the Democratic Party had already turned in to a cult of delusional "actually" morons. As in "actually, the slaves aren't really (jus soli) Citizens...because they are not part of the political group that fought the war and didn't sign on to the Constitution and stuff like that. Like the Indians, bro." (The native Americans that refused to integrate or acknowledge the Constitution wanted to remain a separate civilization without any ability to enter in to enforceable treaties and in today's political theories simply did not even establish their own "political group". (The slaves born on the plantations should have all had the same Constitutional rights that the children of the slavers had). But anyway, RFK should continue to work with Trump in the same way that "coalitions" in parliamentary republics do. The trick is whether Trump at this stage can openly endorse one of RFK's candidates for Congress over his own party's candidates. The coalition agreements happen after the elections when Prime Ministers have Executive Branch powers. That's why no third party can gain traction because they don't see how they can win the Oval Office nor Congressional seats and yet "Independents" do win sometimes but only because they pledge to "caucus" with one of the parties. Usually the Demon Rats. I think if the threat of the Communist coalitions were to go away (and how can this happen since FDR?) then anti-Marxists can split in to smaller parties and "caucus with the Republicans and maybe some day the "two party system" can go away completely. It's really the slavery issue that created this system and since it's still this way it's easy to then understand that the "Confederate" threat never diminished. The Republican Party is the only party to have true fidelity to the Constitution even if Progressive jurisprudence and Marxist law professors confuse their students so much that some can actually imagine guys like Mitt Romney as a "Republican" while he swears up and down his fealty to the rule of law while denouncing Trump day and night for every Marxist grievance and even lies brazenly about the "January 6" stories.
1