Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Sean Hannity on possible Trump-DeSantis matchup" video.

@TheHaas123 Good call.
2
Ron DeSantis isn't in that much of a hurry. If you want the country to last more than another decade you have to have a better long term vision. These guys need to work together more and at the same time allow the voters to make the choices offered to them from a fuller menu than has ever been offered since FDR's attempt at sealing one party socialist rule in the USA.
1
@ThatTCG OK, psycho.
1
@thomasskarimbas6052 Indicted for what? First Degree Reactionary Capitalism? Let me see if I can find that in the US Federal criminal code...oh, you must be Russian or Chinese.
1
@thomasskarimbas6052 A Federal indictment? Cite the criminal code violation.
1
@manisthemeasure2205 What a childish thing for you to say.
1
@PhenixJoe I can disagree with Trump's impulsiveness while not trying to play fake "sociologist" games. The amazing thing is that you seem to think that you know above and beyond Trump what is in "the best interests of the (US) citizens" when you don't even know what Trump's legitimate concerns are. What Trump should do is work on getting a very competent VPOTUS. Ideally, someone like Ted Cruz to cut his way through the legal and bureaucratic traps that bogged him down while in office the first time. DeSantis doesn't fit that bill perfectly. OTOH, DeSantis is a better communicator than Trump is but still only experienced TDS from the outside rather than in. Too many people will think simply substituting DeSantis for Trump will solve all of the problems Trump exposed. This is dangerously wrong. Trump and DeSantis need to work together. If they go head to head in a primary fight they need to behave more like Ted Cruz than Trump did the first time. And yet how can anyone judge Trump's behavior at this stage? Nobody has ever experienced the things that he has experienced and there is still a runaway self-righteous Marxist cult running the DOJ and targeting Trump as Arch Reactionary Capitalist to Save Our Democracy. The truth is that nobody is better positioned to fully understand what happened. And Rudy Giuliani is the best advisor I know of. And he needs more allies in elected office, that's for sure. Don't play the Marxist "divide and conquer" game for them. Try to be much more thoughtful and "constructive" with your critiques. And by the way, can you give me an example of any time Trump ever chose his "ego" over "the best interests of the citizens" with a clear explanation of what the choices were that you allege Trump faced?
1
@PhenixJoe You reason like a Jacobin. So there's that. I'm willing to hear your more thoughtful exposition, if you have any. You ended with a mendacious "fact" claim, just like Jacobin Marxists are inculcated to do. But that starts in our schools. No leftwing media needed for that.
1
@rickg4802 They'd both lose the nomination if they went against each other during the primary. Marxists still control corporate media. That won't change any time soon.
1
@AlexLee360 I think it's foolish to use terms like "pettiness" when reviewing what you think happened to a "real estate mogul" that got attacked by Obama's DOJ and the Clinton gang even before winning the Presidency. Trump, speaking as an objective critic, is a flawed human. Guess what? It might seem petty and just looking simply at whatever the supposed scandal is, of course it is. But the fight is over nothing less than the rule of law versus "Administrative law" that got it's start in the USA under FDR's New Deal and then was "codified" (not really) in to Congressional law as a complex legal framework that blatantly subverts the US Constitution. But it was signed in the very early stages of the Cold War when DC and the Democrat Party (racketeering cult) were seen as saviors because that is how Big Media of that time painted them. I never let my emotional reactions affect what I think about politicians that I've never met (and never plan to). I always disliked the image of Trump and his entire enterprise. But not because he's "Capitalist". I just don't enjoy spending time listening to anyone from New York or even Chicago "business communities". But I'm not a child about it. Anyway, what seems petty just might be. But a lot of the "petty reactions" have a purpose when fighting this insane cult of Marxists. Their destructive, unrelenting depravity might at times seem petty as well and yet it's not. Look at how unhinged they immediately became as soon as Hillary Clinton sent out the proverbial "bat signal". In my judgement DeSantis handles it better but can't get it done in DC without Trump paving the way. If they get in to a primary fight there would be nothing good about it. And DeSantis has young kids. Trump has young grandkids. They're not even close to being in the same generation. Trump has more experience in understanding what exactly has happened in DC since Clinton beat Bush. DeSantis doesn't have the wisdom of working in "business" during that age and neither does he have the experience of being targeted by the DOJ since 2015. Trump and DeSantis should both coordinate their activities with minimal conflict between each other. That is what patriots expect. They both have a lot to learn still and they each have different toolsets to help restore Constitutional governance.
1
@WaluigiMangione Couldn't and didn't don't have the same meaning. Learn to "English" better.
1
@annieoakley5939 Time for a trip to the Oracle of Delphi, I guess.
1
@Subremedy You don't let leftwing losers control the debate. It was an inherently mendacious question designed to take the focus off of that Crusty Communist going by the name of Cristy.
1
@WaluigiMangione Hee haw.
1
@WaluigiMangione Nope.
1
@JohnGalt1960 The Democrat Party of the USA was created with a corrupt agenda that they never gave up on. They pivoted from owning slaves as property to representing "labor" as zero sum agents "fighting capitalism". When did they stop electing racists? I don't think ever. I think JFK wasn't a racist but he got in by accident. His father was a racist, for sure. Even Obama is a racist with cognitive dissonance. He believes in "natural white supremacy" but also "Equity" agenda described in the Communist Manifesto. He thinks all wealth just exists and needs to be "shared equitably". The "white races" have been "hogging it" with their "guns and religion""
1
@WaluigiMangione Get a proper dictionary. Mendacious means faulty and leading away from objective truth(s). It doesn't imply intent, moron. Only with today's dipshits and their false dilemmas do we get these false binaries that people like you use. And in "common usage" the modern dictionaries report that "mendacious" is often used as a synonym for "lying". "Active mendacity" for you I think means intentional deception. Clowns like you are amusing, I have to say...everything that you write is mendacious, as far as I can see. You've only been taught mendacious modes of thinking and communicating. That's pretty sad.
1
Patriotic Australians understand the threat to the USA better than virtually all Americans do. They're closer to China.
1
Bingo.
1
@idalily3810 Yes. We must listen to all of you Political Science Experts.
1
@idalily3810 "How is attacking DeSantis PRIOR to anyone declaring and PRIOR to the midterms going to be good for the country?" This is a fallacious question. Do you even realize it, Utopian lunatic? "I have a love-hate relationship with the guy," Excellent. Start with that to solve your problem. It has nothing to do with anyone here on YouTube or anywhere else in the real world.
1
@idalily3810 LOL. OK, whiny "beeyatch". The obvious answer is that your question already had a false assumption built in to it. If you don't like facing reality - that is indeed your problem. The most common (and lame) example is when someone asks "Have you stopped beating your wife?" To answer as either yes or no is to assume that "wife beating" already took place. This kind of fallacious logic used to be explained to high school students. I'm sorry you missed it.
1
@idalily3810 Your question contained more than a single word, dipshit. You're trying to defend yourself by further demonstrating just how bad you are at rational thought and debate. "You have been nasty in every post you've made to me, because I dared to criticize one thing about Trump." LOL. OK, child. This isn't a psych counseling session. You're doing it all wrong. Instead of taking more comments as a warning you just barrel on ahead. Where did you learn to "debate" like this? Facebook University?
1
@idalily3810 I will endeavor strenuously to persevere after that epic smackdown.
1
@jjm152 LOL. They're two different people from two different generations. It's not that kind of competition or shouldn't be. Unless you're a zero-sum Marxist
1
@Q And?
1
@fastted9390 It was a dumb quip, for sure. The "no intelligence" remark came from you.
1
@janesevy4372 Which President in the age of television had "more class" that Trump, in your opinion?
1
@janesevy4372 LOL. You incorrectly use terms from psychological profiling. "He demands you be loyal to him not the US CONSTITUTION. " This stupid meme comes directly from James Comey, one of legions of abject morons. Trump asked him to be loyal to #45 rather than #44. #44 gave Comey controversial but lawful permission to investigate Trump the candidate as an "illegal foreign agent" of Russia. Comey's oath was to the US Constitution. He can't then carry that permission forward against the new sworn President unless he's a traitor. And Comey is a traitor, by his own implicit admission. Comey's "Higher Loyalty" is not to the US Constitution. Even if Comey had some kind of perfect evidence against Trump as "foreign spy" or whatever, he absolutely had to follow Trump's lawful EO's and abandon any EO's or authorizations that came from Obama. They expired the moment Trump was sworn in. Do you idiots understand anything at all that you bloviate endlessly about? What Comey described as "nefarious" was an essential screening question for Comey, who had already shown horrible judgement in the Clinton "email" scandals. Comey should have been fired on day one. Trump was way too trusting of these scumbag Marxist morons.
1
@janesevy4372 Your standard for "class" is Reagan. Wonderful. Now give me a list of the viable candidates for President that have the same "class" and likelihood of success as Trump. I can only name one person. And even then it's possible that his "class" would make it easier for Marxist corporate media to malign him. Trump is hard to ignore because they think they can "curate" and virally propagate all of the uncouth things that he says and therefore attack his popular support. That's the hilarious thing. I didn't create the current conditions. Trying to explain how best to solve problems doesn't make me one of the bad guys. And it wasn't up to me to choose Ted Cruz over Donald Trump.
1
@janesevy4372 How old are you? You write like a child. Do you know what Freudian projection is?
1
Afraid? LOL.
1