Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Mark Levin: Nobody has ever done this" video.

@Srekwah What diamond in the rough? Fox is devolving, not readying itself for refinement.
6
@andrelotscher280 Where does that leave you in accordance with your own worldview?
4
@ellie5562 Explain what you think American Exceptionalism means according to Marxists and Constitutionalists.
4
@jasonscott6174 You're obviously joking but I'm not sure you even get your own joke.
3
@lorettathomas3994 The term was coined by Stalin. He believed that America was exceptional but disagreed that it was not ripe for Communist revolution. What is exceptional about America is the vast resources and no land grants held by monarchs and given to allies and their descendants. This changed how "unfair property rights" are perceived in the USA because the extreme examples of European monarchs and feudalism never occurred in America. Constitutionalists believe America is exceptional basically for those reasons and that it's the only nation on the planet to ever have a Constitution ratified in that way. And therefore the Bill of Rights is very difficult for Marxists to overcome without revolution. The USA is the only nation to ever have existed that has explicit enforceable "rights" in the document that is supposed to frame and limit any changes that any legislature wants to make with a simple majority vote. But I just gave you facts, not an "ism". Stalin called it an ideological fallacy because he believed that all nations must fall by revolution even if certain parties help legislate their way on the socialist road to Communism. And in a court of law there's no such thing as collective rights. Collective rights exist only in theory. International relations, the law of treaties, might use the language of "rights" but these rights claims are more like gentlemen's agreements (like the Peace of Westphalia) than actual enforceable legal rights. Europeans can't get over this "class war" thing. That's why they don't understand the US Constitution. If they do they usually decide to apply for US Citizenship. No serious lover of the US Constitution would ever support a Democratic Party politician.
3
The Progressives at Fox don't really understand either side. They fashion themselves as Conservative Progressives, not knowing that US Progressives explicitly want to overcome the Amendment process because they know their projects don't pass careful muster. Or maybe they just don't care. They're the "feelings" generation running Fox now. Paul Ryan is their elder statesman advising the Board of Directors. LOL.
1
@andrelotscher280 Why do you show up to promote low IQ Marxist tropes everywhere?
1
@pamcooper5837 I agree with Mark Levin 100% on issues that I agree are essential to have consensus on. That idea is actually the very basis of liberty under the rule of law. And there's nothing I've ever heard first from him. It's just as easy for me to say that he agrees 100% with me. The doctrines that are being fought over existed long before the Civil War. He's right about the Democratic Party being formed as an anti-constitutionalist party. They're really like the French Jacobins in terms of how they decide what "true democracy" and so forth is. They (this cult that threatens peace all around the world) simply joined with the Constitutionalists to get rid of the British monarch's power over the American colonies. People forget, if they ever learn in the first place, that Napoleon was a Corsican infantryman that fought on the side of the "Third Estate" Jacobins. The cult of the "disenfranchised" that hold the power of the mobs. The US Democratic Party has always behaved like Jacobins trying to stir up mobs that they use to threaten those holding power or those threatening to displace them. Anyway, the point is that even Napoleon fashioned himself as a "republican Freedom fighter" when republicanism simply meant getting rid of the monarch. And then he made himself a monarch. LOL. But yeah, Mark is dead on and it's understood even better if you know the detailed history of politics in France and the UK in the centuries leading up to the US Revolution. You're more clear on exactly what the founders were referring to and how wisely they outmaneuvered evil demagogues.
1